User talk:Chrishm21

This is Chrishm21's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 3 months

Thanks for uploading File:La Isla Bonita audio sample.mp3. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your comments about not having access to many of the data sources. I strongly suggest you open an account at The Wikipedia Library, where the academic-level sources are available, as are really superb resources like newspaper.com. All these are free for Wikipedians to use, and if you want to put something through FAC, it's vital to use its resources to turn something that's good into something excellent. I hope this helps. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 07:54, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the suggestion @SchroCat:! I do have to wonder - is it necessary to use The Wikipedia Library for an article to be FA approved? I looked into it and some of the book sources (and web sources) are already present on the article. Christian (talk) 16:01, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not one of the criteria, but the criteria do say that it needs to be a thorough review of the relevant literature, and if you miss out sources (as someone has identified in your FAC), then they will fail it accordingly. It's always worth having a look at what there is there - the newspaper coverage alone is worth the very minor trouble doing it, but you may find some excellent coverage of other areas too. - SchroCat (talk) 19:53, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Celebration Tour you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:24, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, my apologies for the delay in the completion of this review. I was trying to finish it yesterday and my laptop suddenly froze in the evening on Chrome, tried restarting multiple times to no avail so unfortunately I lost so much progress at once and will have to go from reception again now. --K. Peake 21:11, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Kyle Peake:! No worries! Thank you so much for the reeview. I'll look at it this week, or the beginning of the next. If I can't do it myself, is it Ok if another user helps me? perhaps @11JORN:--Christian (talk) 21:12, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Celebration Tour you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Celebration Tour and Talk:The Celebration Tour/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 19:06, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Celebration Tour you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Celebration Tour for comments about the article, and Talk:The Celebration Tour/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 20:44, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]