User talk:CharlesHBennett

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
545		Rechargeable battery (talk)						Add sources
388		Nickel–cadmium battery (talk)						Add sources
2,019		Sulfur (talk)						Add sources
237		Marylebone (talk)						Add sources
40		Commonly used gamma-emitting isotopes (talk)						Add sources
406		Nuclear fuel (talk)						Add sources
1,149		Tongue (talk)						Cleanup
252		Nuclear technology (talk)						Cleanup
200		Molten salt battery (talk)						Cleanup
130		Digital journalism (talk)						Expand
172		Vehicular communication systems (talk)						Expand
106		Crisis of the Roman Republic (talk)						Expand
91		Lexical set (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
127		Integral fast reactor (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
220		Islamic–Jewish relations (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
24		Alpha-Aminoadipic acid (talk)						Merge
298		Hydride (talk)						Merge
108		Shoelaces (talk)						Merge
8		Liang Yuan (talk)						Wikify
31		Cascades (company) (talk)						Wikify
615		Combined Statistical Area (talk)						Wikify
31		Human viruses in water (talk)						Orphan
1		Alessandro Cicutti (talk)						Orphan
3		Arexion (talk)						Orphan
17		Archaeocyte (talk)						Stub
77		Sodium ferrocyanide (talk)						Stub
6		Claus P. Schnorr (talk)						Stub
26		André-Louis Debierne (talk)						Stub
199		Permissible exposure limit (talk)						Stub
38		Ammonium bisulfate (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:01, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, CharlesHBennett, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Calaka (talk) 15:08, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Charles and thank you for your edit to Hearing impairment. But could you please add a reference? Lova Falk talk 16:52, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just noticed that you requested a few months ago that ⁴⁰Ca be recolored in this image. I can regenerate the whole image with a different color scheme if necessary. I started a thread about it at WT:WikiProject Chemistry#Isotopes_and_half-life.svg_–_colors. -- BenRG (talk) 21:27, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Job (role), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moonlighting (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See new chem project proposal

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Chemistry/Participants#Proposal_for_project. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meduban (talk • contribs) 22:03, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Svea 123, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Entrainment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Has been fixed to point to entrainment (hydrodynamics) some time ago.CharlesHBennett (talk) 06:26, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, i am a german wikipedian and noticed an error in the german wikipedia. I had a look at the english article and noticed that the error is also there. Could you correct his one? I noticed that you re interested in physial chemistry, so you might be the correct person to address.--92.201.118.140 (talk) 10:22, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I enlarged the Radium-223 chloride article, about a particular form of this isotope used in cancer therapy, to cover other chemical forms of the isotope and other aspects besides medical uses. Accordingly I want to change the article's name (ie Move it) to be simply Radium-223. However I can't because the Radium-223 was already a redirect to one line of a big table on the isotopes of radium page. I changed it to point to the Radium-223 chloride article instead, but that still didn't allow me to Move Radium-223 chloride to the desired name Radium-223. So what I am asking is how to replace the redirect by an article which already exists, then change the name of the article to be the same as no-longer-needed redirect?CharlesHBennett (talk) 16:38, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All you need to do is place {{db-g6|rationale=reason}} at the top of Radium-223 , replacing the word "reason" with a simple piece of text explaining the actual reason. A helpful admin should then appear and delete this page and, with any luck, also moving the existing article page to that location. Better still, you could use Template:Db-move with similar effect. Just let me know below if you have any questions. Ben MacDui 17:38, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Conference on World Affairs may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• g. http://www.colorado.edu/cwa/archives/prosopographies/cwa1967.pdf, and similarly for other years)</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:26, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grand Central Terminal, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Orion, Taurus and Gemini (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I've noticed your edits to Lattice energy and I want to ask if it is defined for metalic solids?--188.26.22.131 (talk) 14:15, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear 188.26.22.131, You don't seem to have a user page, so I'm replying here. The lattice energy for a metallic solid is defined as the energy difference between the metal crystal and widely separated metal atoms. Because of the important contribution to the energy of a metallic crystal from the electron gas, the lattice energy of a metal is harder to calculate than that of an ionic solid.

Thanks for your answer! I'm wondering how is the case for the lattice energy of a covalent solid like sugar? How can the lattice energy be defined/determined in this case?--188.26.22.131 (talk) 15:55, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You added mention of hangul, as another system "representing speech organs". I'm about to edit this, because I really do not think it is (quite) true; but the stunning example of hangul seems worth mentioning... in that it is a _systematic_ representation of (Korean!) phonetics, while the basis of IPA is a hodgepodge of European pronunciations of the roman alphabet. You might like to look at my wording, and if you can improve it, please do. Incidentally I just looked at the visible speech article, and it is full of odd wording ("aural acoustic sounds" etc) which could do with some work... Imaginatorium (talk) 06:23, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Infinitive, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greek. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of buzzwords, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Herding cats. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Bot, but it's probably OK. The disambiguation page for Herding Cats is also where the idiomatic meaning of trying to control an uncontrollable situation is concisely presented, as the first of several meaningsCharlesHBennett (talk) 12:16, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear CharlesHBennett,

The response might be the same this time, but many things have changed and I think it is time to inquire once more about inclusion of the so-called "delusion" or "mimetic" theory of humor. I have presented it in 2013 and 2014 before top scholars in the field. They themselves, John Morreall, Daniel C. Dennett, and Simon Critchley (as well as A. Peter McGraw and Matthew Hurley through communications) acknowledge the significance of the work, though only in unpublished responses.

Another response was this positive e-mail from Bob Mankoff of The New Yorker.

Dear Christopher,

Have read your brilliant and scathing reviews of everyone else's theories of humor, but 

can't find the one that you allude to as completely satisfying the necessary and sufficient conditions for the the [sic] phenomena.

As a cartoonist and cartoon editor of The New Yorker magazine have a very practical interest 

in how humor works and for over a decade I've been in communication with pretty much everyone who has offered theoretical approaches to the the topic.

That said, I would love to talk to you about your views at our mutual convenience. 
Best, 
Bob Mankoff 

CharlesHBennett, I want to note that Bob is speaking inaccurately or ambiguously about "not being able to find" my theory, as it is clearly and succinctly contained in the essays he is talking about. What Bob means is either that he cannot find other reference to it, or that he cannot find publication of it in a book or academic article. But this is only because academia as a society seem to be, to some extent, preventing publication of my work. To conclude, there are my many writings on humor in amazon.com reviews, which in some writers' cases are in fact professional works published elsewhere. A search for me turns up about 1300 hits on google.

I'd like to know if it is still an OR or COI issue, or unjustified case for inclusion and if so, understand. Continuing to seek actual publication, anyway. This is what Winterstein said in 2013 Dear Cdg1072, you would also need to satisfy _notability_. You should promote your theories within academia first (or another public space), and only then add them to Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Winterstein (talk • contribs) 16:38, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

I don't know what is causing the blocks appearing in Mankoff's message that I pasted from linkedin.

Sincerely,

cdg1072Cdg1072 (talk) 18:11, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I did not undertake your rename request as it would have moved this name. To request a merge of accounts, please list it at m:SRUC and sign with the two accounts involved. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:34, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your move as, contrary to what you claimed, the two women's names are not spelled "exactly the same". Ramona Moore is the one from the Bronx, Romona Moore is the one from Brooklyn. Therefore there was no need, ever, for disambiguation terms. Read more carefully next time. When I created the former article I also created the hatnote that I put on both articles to help people who got confused; that's all we need to do.

(BTW, we should probably create an article about Eugene Palmer, instead of just a hatnote). Daniel Case (talk) 03:36, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your requested company article is now in mainspace at: Relaxacizor, Inc. Thanks -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 08:55, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Real estate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cyanide, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bluing. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Constellation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asterism. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reagent, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Substrate. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Could you please comment at Talk:Sally port#Comparison of sally ports to turnstiles, exits from airport secure areas, etc.. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:59, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Widow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sati (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, that citation you added to NAD is out of date, recent work shows that NR is actually bioavailable. I added that info to the salvage pathways section and deleted the supplement section. Hope that's OK Tim Vickers (talk) 18:41, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27721479?dopt=Abstract

I modified the section about his politica/social views, I hope you find the edit constructive and of your liking! Ffaffff (talk) 17:56, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CharlesHBennett,

I responded to your comment on the talk page Talk:Charles H. Bennett (computer scientist). It would be nice to have your opinion about the best choice of epithet to use.

All the best, JBL (talk) 17:52, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Conspiracy theory; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]