User talk:Bucketsofg

Archives:

up to April 2006

up to end of April 2006

up to end of May 2006

up to the end of August 2006

up to the end of October 2006

up to the end of December 2006

up to the end of January 2007

up to the end of July 2007

Thank you so much for your participation in my recent RfB. Though it closed with 72% support (below the required 90%), I'm still quite pleased at the outpouring of support shown by a fair percentage of the community.

I'm currently tabulating and calculating all opposing and neutral arguments to help me better address the community's concerns about my abilities as a bureaucrat. If you'd like, you can follow my progress (and/or provide additional suggestions) at User:EVula/admin/RfB notes. Thanks again! EVula // talk // ☯ // 04:30, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider lifting your semi-protection of Regina, Saskatchewan. You semi-protected it on 19 March 2007 [1] with the summary "IP edit war". BigNate37_(T) 17:17, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Done. Bucketsofg 17:41, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks! BigNate37_(T) 21:47, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome! Mill cleaner —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mill cleaner (talk • contribs)

I replied to your oppose vote. I hope you don't mind. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 20:40, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I replied again, it's rather messy though, but that's the best that I could write without my spell and grammar checker. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 21:09, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am contacting you because you participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francesco Dionigi, which resulted in the deletion of Francesco Dionigi. A new article has been created about the same person, Dionigi di Borgo San Sepolcro. I have nominated it for deletion, and you may wish to read the new article and comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dionigi di Borgo San Sepolcro (2nd nomination). --Akhilleus (talk) 06:57, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• At the stub Genealogia deorum gentilium I just made an article from. Please edit to make any improvements you can see or give me some suggestions on the article Talk Page. Thanks.--Doug ^talk 12:46, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I just wanted to let you know that I have tried to address the concerns you expressed at my RfA. Even though I feel that edit was BLP compliant, I don't think you'll find anything else objectionable if you go through more of my mainspace edits. Take care! -- But|seriously|folks  03:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the follow-up and good wishes. Same to you! -- But|seriously|folks  04:40, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You said: "Keep. The topic is encyclopedic. Period. Is the article a mess? Yup. WP:SOFIXIT. Bucketsofg 13:01, 10 July 2007 (UTC)"[reply]

Your vote only counts if the topic stays at "Christianity and Buddhism," though. Remember the title WAS "Buddhist influences on Christianity." THAT topic was not encyclopedic. WhisperToMe 16:41, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

Can you please explain your edit summary here and on a few other images sourced from the same site?

Do you mean that because the source doesnt assert copyright, it is alright to take from such sources? What then will prevent me from dumping the best pictures stolen from elsewhere on my blog and then uploading it onto wiki from my blog? Where ofcourse, there wont be a 'copyright assertion' in sight!

Also, age of the inscription has nothing to do with copyright. Nobody is claiming copyright over the inscription itself. Copyright is only over the photograph of the inscription. The pyramids are 5-6 thousand years old. But if I take a photograph of the pyramids, the rights of the photograph belongs to me unless I release it. Please explain your removal of my tags. Thanks. Sarvagnya 18:20, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

??? Sarvagnya 09:59, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Bucketsofg, for participating in my RfB, which ended unsuccessfully with a final tally of (80/22/3). I shall continue to work on behalf of the community's interests and improve according to your suggestions. Most sincere regards, Húsönd 23:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply] Obrigado, Bucketsofg, por participares no meu RfB, que terminou sem sucesso com um resultado final de (80/22/3). Continuarei a trabalhar em prol dos interesses da comunidade e a melhorar segundo vossas sugestões. Calorosos cumprimentos, Húsönd 23:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply] Thanks • Obrigado • Gracias • Merci • Danke • Спасибо • Tack • Kiitos Esker • Köszönöm • Takk • Grazie • Hvala • ありがとう • 謝謝 • 谢谢

Thanks in part to your support, I am Wikipedia's newest bureaucrat. I will do my best to live up to your confidence and kind words. Andre (talk) 09:15, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bucketsofg has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, and therefore, I've officially declared today as Bucketsofg's day! For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian, enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Bucketsofg! A record of your Day will always be kept here. Love, Phaedriel 19:32, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Pg79fig1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bleh999 06:05, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am messaging you about the recreation (I believe for the fifth time) of the article Circus metal. I have seen you have participated in a previous AfD procedure for the article, and I would think you would be interested to give your opinion in the most recent one. Thanks in advance.

ZOUAVMAN LE ZOUAVE 10:49, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wish that were true, but I doubt it. Thanks for your attention on the matter, I respect your decision.►Chris Nelson 20:16, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I wish this person would compromise, but he will not compromise. You an see his behavior continues here and here. This has stemmed from this discussion. He has already asserted that he WP:OWNs these articles and even went so far as to tell a user that he wanted to do all the Miami Dolphins userboxes. He has insulted me and violated a number of policies and guidelines. I did not violate 3RR. I went through articles and edited them to reflect a compromise that must be used to satisfy both sides of the issue. He then engaged me in edit warring (not the other way around). If you want me to go through dispute resolution, i will, but i don't think that's needed when he has brazenly asserted "I have already proven why my way is correct, and if you can't get it then that's on you." Jmfangio| ►Chat  02:53, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry you've been dragged into this. My comments:

• The edits I've made on Culpepper are accurate, and that is what he simply cannot get. He pretended to offer a compromise, but it was just what he wanted all along. And it was wrong.
• I don't own anything and never claim to. But I am making accurate edits and I stand by them for the good of the encyclopedia.
• Yes, I did ask User:Phbasketball6 if I could do the Miami Dolphins player infoboxes, because it's my favorite team and I enjoy editing them. We were going to split up teams to edit, and I asked if I could do the Dolphins. He happily agreed and asked if he could do the Eagles and Cardinals, and I said I wouldn't edit those. No problem there.
• Jmfangio did violate 3RR, he seems completely delusional about this. You said so yourself.
• Regarding "edit warring", I'll point out that it takes two parties to edit war, neither one more responsible than the other.
• I did prove my side correct, he just doesn't want to accept reason.

Again, I'm sorry you've been brought into this.►Chris Nelson 03:05, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've reverted your closure of the AFD, as the speedy keeping guidelines mentions nothing about articles nominated in a vandalised/disruptive state, and I still feel as if the article has some fundamental issues which need addressing. Thanks, Will ^(talk) 18:17, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, close it at as a SNOW tommorow (if you can close it as SNOW). Will ^(talk) 18:37, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to participate at the discussion in my Request for Adminship. Unfortunately the nomination did not succeed, but please rest assured that I am still in full support of the Wikipedia project. I listened carefully to all concerns, and will do my best to incorporate all of the constructive advice that I received, into my future actions on Wikipedia. If you can think of any other ways that I can further improve, please let me know. Best wishes, Elonka 04:57, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Ken Boessenkool, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Deiz talk 13:36, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you tell me why you deleted the article "Academic Citizenship" on Feb 01 this year. I can't find any info about this in the deletion log. Thanks, Barbara 130.216.169.36 05:13, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm currently trapped in a seemingly never-ending revert war with GoldDragon on the Joe Volpe page. There are basically two main points of contention: whether or not information relating to Roy Cullen's riding association should be included, and what the article text should be for the "placement agency" section. Any comment you could provide would be appreciated. CJCurrie 04:08, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just checked the logs for St. Bartholomew's Day massacre and you have had it semiprotected since Dec. of 2006. Could you unblock it now? I think the edit warring has calmed down. 71.131.29.183 03:30, 3 October 2007 (UTC) (not logged in User:Hairchrm.[reply]

I would like to know why this page was deleted and/or what I could do that would make it acceptable to repost the page without fear of deletion. For instance, Sean Morrison has won the following awards, and is notable for a number of other reasons. Also, I would like access to the text of the deleted page.

These awards include, according to the Detroit News, "The Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers in 2003, Wired Magazine's Rave Award for Science in 2003 and Technology Review magazine's list of 100 innovators in 2002. Morrison earned the prestigious title of investigator from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute in 2000. He became one of more than 300 scientists at research institutes around the county chosen because of his potential to make significant contributions to science" http://detnews.com/specialreports/2006/michiganians/morrison.htm.

If I add information such as this, then is the page acceptable in terms of the notability standards?Aptanalogy (talk) 02:04, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there,

just a quick note to let you know that we've put your RfA Candidate's Song on the phone system of the new Wikimedia Foundation office in San Francisco, as the "on hold" music. :-) Thanks for recording it - we'll put other fun, free licensed music on the system as well.

Best, --Eloquence* 02:44, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Responded to the latest, yesterday. Regards, El_C 10:21, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't expect to see many other Wikipedians in London, Ontario as well - and of all people, I find the creator of my favourite song parody :-). Cheers, —paranomia^{happy harry's high club} 22:10, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, I am from the german Wikipedia from the sociologic section, and I found out that you wrote a song text on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Song . We want to know the reason(s) why you wrote this song. It would be kind of you to leave an english (or german) comment on http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedistik/Soziologie/Musik&action=edit&redlink=1 . Thank you --84.166.123.219 (talk) 07:30, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Bucketsofg. I need to ask you, why did you delete my 'Finding Mimo' article? Reply here: Micky 1234567890123 (talk) 19:03, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying to me so quickly Bucketsofg! Micky 1234567890123 (talk) 13:20, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I want to apologize for mistaking your user name (BucketsOFG) for Bucketsfrog. I promise it will never happen again! Micky 1234567890123 (talk) 13:25, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please go to WP:AIV. Thanks -- IRP ☎ 02:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Seems to be dealt with. Bucketsofg 02:10, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just read about and listened to your great song! I see you already have a Barnstar of Good Humour for it; no one has ever deserved it more. You are the model of a modern Wicomedian! Unschool 05:42, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - was looking around, heard your song and wanted to ask sprotection for the page scurvy as it gets constant vandalism, probably due to lots of schools using it. Thanks! --Cpt ricard (talk) 05:32, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just came from scurvy after making a small cleanup. The vandalism has abated, so please consider lifting the sprotect. Thanks! Cmprince (talk) 14:53, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still of the mind to keep semi-permanent sprotect on - like I mentioned on the talk page for scurvy, I think it's mostly schools and libraries where kids have to do projects on it and well . . . idle hands. . . . . We can try removing it but we'd have to keep an eye out right away.--Cpt ricard (talk) 04:10, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Shona Holmes, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shona Holmes. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. I'm relisting this article and you participated in the first discussion so I'm contacting you if you want to be apart of this discussion. Fire 55 (talk) 21:11, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you dont mind that I have your music and song on my userpage... I added a thanks to you. The song is great! Thanks.--Rockstone (talk) 00:16, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bucketsofg! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 271 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. De Lafontaine - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:45, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya,

Looks like you're the author of that, and I just wanted to say - it's great! I love it.

Before I'd heard of it, I had a bit of a thought about using the lyrics of the Major-General song to link to 'interesting' articles, maybe for my user page, and started writing bits, like;

I am the very model of a modern Major-General,

I've information vegetable, animal, and mineral,

I know the kings of England, and I quote the fights historical

From Marathon to Waterloo, in order categorical;

I'm very well acquainted, too, with matters mathematical,

I understand equations, both the simple and quadratical,

About binomial theorem I`m teeming with a lot o` news,

With many cheerful facts about the square of the hypotenuse

...and I mentioned it to KFP (talk · contribs), and he told me about the RfA song.

I was briefly a bit disappointed that my idea was not as original as I'd thought, but I loved the song, and that more than made up for it.

It is superb, and I just wanted to say - thanks.  Chzz  ►  18:55, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for the message, and I'm glad you like it. Feel free to improve it if you like. Bucketsofg 13:32, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man. I have tagged Toi (name) for deletion as an unneeded redlink disambig. Informing you per your edit comment in the page's history. Kahuroa (talk) 10:21, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

birth:august 18 2000 age:10 ocoporation: singer and actor year active: 2004 - present —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.14.159.188 (talk) 11:26, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Bucketsofg,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk)23:22, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please give some input, thanks. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Canfield_ocean Prokaryotes (talk) 20:47, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've mentioned you at AN: Q5W5 (talk · contribs) borrowed your user userpage, creating the impresion that they were an admin instead of a user of five days' standing. Acroterion (talk) 03:38, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bucketsofg.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

---

13:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Bucketsofg. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Tahaki".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 16:05, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:32, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Pg79fig1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:43, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Haungaroa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability is not inherited; mythological daughter without significant coverage to meet WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DannyS712 (talk) 01:55, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:33, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:LyttonMajorGeneralMop.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User article&talk ban has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Trialpears (talk) 15:56, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:06, 1 November 2021 (UTC) Thanks. Bucketsofg 00:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC) Thanks Bucketsofg 22:45, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 08:51, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:22, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]