User talk:Aceing Winter Snows Harsh Cold

Hello, I am a new user to Wikipedia. I have read the "Welcome to Wikipedia", what are some other great pages to read about Wikipedia's, policies and rules. I already read the terms and conditions before signing up for the account. Aceing_Winter_Snows_Harsh_Cold (talk) 06:19, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you can find more information at WP:CUSTOMSIG. GiantSnowman 17:22, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you let me know what edits you want looking at, I'll do so. GiantSnowman 09:22, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@GiantSnowman:      Some IPv6 user, if you look thru this talk page history, has been putting some nonsensical things and words on my talk page.  First, I do not own any blog that the IPv6 user has stated.  I think this user is just trying to just vandalize, just to get some sort of response, like a troll would.  I just want to remove that stuff from the page history, and forget about this incident.  I do not want to waste any more energy, or time, on that nonsensical nonsense.

Aceing_Winter_Snows_Harsh_Cold (talk) 18:50, 22 January 2017 (UTC)   [reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tanushree Dutta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Jiz P requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:07, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Brrr(Onomatopoeia). Since you had some involvement with the Brrr(Onomatopoeia) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – 333-blue at 00:42, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aceing Winter Snows Harsh Cold. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aceing Winter Snows Harsh Cold. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

How do I implement the Template:Service awards into my user page. Does it automatically adds the ribbons and things? Aceing_Winter_Snows_Harsh_Cold (talk) 01:36, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The basic usage follows {{service awards|year=X|month=Y|day=Z|edits=ABC}} , where you replace the letters with your actual values. It will automatically change the image, but only after you manually change the |edits= value. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 01:52, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac: So I have to change the edit value after ever edit? Aceing_Winter_Snows_Harsh_Cold (talk) 01:54, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting your current number of edits is not possible with just a template, so yes, you have to update it. I suggest that there's no need to update it unless your edit count has increased by, say, 10 percent, or 1000 edits. Remember that being excessively focused on your edit count is not viewed with much favor. Stick to making good contributions to the project. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:10, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. The template doesn't actually change values/ribbons except for at certain values (see Wikipedia:Service_awards#Requirements), so for example if you set |edits=200, there's no point in changing that number until you hit |edits=1000 - unless you want to, of course, but as jmcgnh says, being super-focused on how many edits you have isn't terribly productive. Primefac (talk) 02:16, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted this, as it is a cross-namespace redirect from article space. That meets WP:CSD#R2. We don't really refer to WP space in article space. Do you remember if you created more of these, or is this was the only one? --Floquenbeam (talk) 23:17, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Floquenbeam: - That was the first redirect I made that points to a Wikipedia:.... page, so no. Other redirects I made always are part of the article space and point to article space. Sorry for the trouble. Aceing_Winter_Snows_Harsh_Cold (talk) 23:21, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just edit conflicted with you to say that I'm wrong. Actually, it's not part of CSD#R2, I guess, there's an exception for WP-space. I misread. If you want, I'll undelete, but even if it isn't a CSD criterion, it seems a bad idea to have lots of these shortcuts floating around in article space. But I'll undelete if you want, it is not a CSD candidate after all. --Floquenbeam (talk) 23:22, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Cross-namespace redirects seems to say that new ones of these are discouraged, but I'd have to use WP:RFD if you disagree, and that's WAY too much trouble. So I'll just ask you if deletion is OK. --Floquenbeam (talk) 23:25, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Floquenbeam:It's ok if you just delete it. The only reason why I made it was the Wikipedia: portion of typing it. Otherwise there is Wikipedia:RFPP, I thought RFPP would be useful for those who did not want to type the Wikipedia part. But, if it is discouraged then delete it. Aceing_Winter_Snows_Harsh_Cold (talk) 23:31, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks, I'll keep it deleted. --Floquenbeam (talk) 23:33, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Passerby edit) @Aceing Winter Snows Harsh Cold: You probably know this, but in case you don't, you don't have to type the "Wikipedia:" part out. "WP:" is a shortcut you can use, e.g. WP:RFPP. 28bytes (talk) 19:30, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Floquenbeam: - I have a important question about a comment made at Administrators Noticeboard. The last portion of Grandpalama comment that he made at [1] which can be seen near the end of that section, (it's above Boing! said Zebedee comment (which is above mine), and bellow a comment that Nil Einne made). I feel like he is referring to the bureaucratic as the users who voted in support or opposing the ban, and said that it was a exercise, and described the exercise in a weird unethical manner. Should this unethical comment be subject to removal or redactation or something else? I am new to this type of thing, and maybe Grandpalama meant something else. Aceing_Winter_Snows_Harsh_Cold (talk) 00:02, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's not unethical, and it's not a personal attack on anyone, it's just rude and ridiculously overboard. Frankly, you are too new to be considering removing other people's comments anywhere; if it needs to be removed, someone else can do it. --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:43, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed this comment of yours as I was re-closing the section last night. I would encourage you to avoid making comments of that nature, and indeed to focus more on article edits than noticeboard commentary. There is lots of work to be done in the article space; I'm sure there are ways you could apply your talents there. Repeated insulting, unhelpful, or unnecessary comments on the noticeboards is not a good use of your skills and may lead to you being asked not to participate on those boards in the future. 28bytes (talk) 04:04, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I’m curious what it is about my history, especially my recent history, that makes you say in the AN/I that I “can’t be trusted”. Thanks. —В²C ☎ 07:05, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Born2Cycle:I have answered that question on my most recent addition at this time, to the discussion pertaining to you over at ANI. Aceing_Winter_Snows_Harsh_Cold (talk) 01:27, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An RfC need to be stated briefly, so you should probably rephrase more tersely rather than copy that wall of text, if you want other editors to engage your ideas. El_C 06:13, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Electrical injury, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EMS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:37, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Aceing Winter Snows Harsh Cold,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Termux for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Alucard 16_{❯❯❯ chat?} 04:43, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Bollywood films of 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:27, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just to set your mind at ease. (Saw your posts on WMSR's page.) You really shouldn't make suggestions like that, though that one is admittedly pretty funny. -- SashiRolls ^{🌿 · 🍥} 02:08, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Justlettersandnumbers was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Our notability requirements for organisations are quite demanding – there needs to be substantial in-depth coverage specifically about the organisation in a good number of solid independent reliable sources. It is relatively unlikely that an elementary school would meet those requirements; sources such as the school's own website or a press release from a local construction company do nothing to help in that direction.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bubbling Wells Elementary School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bubbling Wells Elementary School, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:56, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aceing Winter Snows Harsh Cold! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:56, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This reads more like a student assignment. Needs more external news sources to show notability, otherwise it should redirect to the school district.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bubbling Wells Elementary School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bubbling Wells Elementary School, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:47, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by John from Idegon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Generally, lower schools are not notable and there is nothing in this draft or in an internet search that indicates this school is an exception. Please find a different topic.

John from Idegon (talk) 18:50, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@John from Idegon:@AngusWOOF:@Justlettersandnumbers: Please copy the above statements to the talk page of User:Hamburgersforever1432, as they were the original creator of the page. The only reason why I sent it for submission was because, the user has not edited the article in a long time after I edited it, and the user is not here that often based on their contribution history. Thus as I stated in the first sentence, please send a copy of the above statements to that users talk page, so that they are not surprised as to what happened to thier draft after it gets deleted due to inactivity. I do not plan to make anymore edits to that draft. Aceing_Winter_Snows_Harsh_Cold (talk) 00:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aceing Winter Snows Harsh Cold! You created a thread called What happened that the refs just vanished and got replaced by template links? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add web series. This article only for bollywood films. Thank you. Sush150 (talk) 02:02, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sush150: That was not a web-series, did you even look at the article? I reverted your edit. Aceing_Winter_Snows_Harsh_Cold (talk) 01:47, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Sandbox. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Even in the sandbox you don't get to do that. Meters (talk) 05:29, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Meters: Thanks for the heads up. I was not trying to do unconstructive edits, as it did sate on the Wikipedia sandbox somewhere that experimentation is allowed there if I am not wrong. I want to know the difference between the user sandbox and Wikipedia sandbox? Don't they share the same purpose? Aceing_Winter_Snows_Harsh_Cold (talk) 05:36, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia sandbox is a public page. That's why it says "Please DO NOT place copyrighted, offensive, or libelous content in sandboxes." You claim you read the sandbox banner, so why did you think it wouldn't be offensive to add pornographic images and videos, and 100 or so instances of "Tit Fuck"? If you wish to pore through commons looking at pornographic images and videos that's your business, but don't drop them on the sandbox. No way was your edit simply experimenting. Meters (talk) 05:44, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Meters: Sorry about that. I think you are right about that. Although then it does come to what people may consider as "offensive". I think the word offensive is too opinionated, and instead vulgar should be added to that list. How and where should I place an RfC of this idea of placing vulgar into that list? Aceing_Winter_Snows_Harsh_Cold (talk) 05:48, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, AWSHC, your comments at ANI such as these: 1 2 3 4 aren't really contributing anything helpful, and they're showing you don't really understand what's happening there. Please consider just reading and not commenting on noticeboards until you know a lot more about them. ANI in particular isn't really a good place for newer users to be contributing. Ping me if you have any questions about this. —valereee (talk) 10:22, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aceing Winter Snows Harsh Cold! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How do I add this to an AFD discussion?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the Joe Biden presidency (2021 Q1), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Robb.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aceing Winter Snows Harsh Cold. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wikipedia:Reason behind Not Forum and Not Host, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:03, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy. Been watching the whole discussion about ARS. I highly doubt Arbcom will bother with trying to settle the ARS dispute, as they don't deal with 'content dispute'. They only review & judge editor behaviour. GoodDay (talk) 21:51, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GoodDay: I am not trying to be mean here but just to let you know, you only provided more proof that ArbCom should get involved. The issue at hand is the behavior in which AfDs are handled. Thus reviewing and coming to a decision based on the behavior and facts of the discussion thus does come under ArbCom. Just saying. Aceing_Winter_Snows_Harsh_Cold (talk) 23:13, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll leave it with you. GoodDay (talk) 23:58, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	A.C.'s Book Stack of Unreadability
	Thank you for trying to move things along in the recent ANI thread. Your attempt at trying to move the now-unreadable discussion to appropriate channels, thereby reducing the threshold for clear measures to be taken and clearing up ANI has been noted by me and others. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Talk 22:24, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harris County, Texas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dallas County.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nina Dobrev has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Anthony Whitaker (talk) 08:09, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]