Template talk:Infobox molybdenum

	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Elements This template is supported by WikiProject Elements, which gives a central approach to the chemical elements and their isotopes on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing this template, or visit the project page for more details.ElementsWikipedia:WikiProject ElementsTemplate:WikiProject Elementschemical elements articles

This template was considered for deletion on 3 April 2012. The result of the discussion was "keep".

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Natural abundance (NA) data are inconsistent with the "isotopes" section and references at the end of these request. I suggest these modifications: 92Mo 14.65% --> 14.84% 94Mo 9.19% --> 9.25% 95Mo 15.87% --> 15.92% 96Mo 16.67% --> 16.68% 97Mo 9.58% --> 9.55% 98Mo 24.29% --> 24.13% 100Mo 9.74% --> 9.63% Furthermore adding references to this section should be a good thing.

references: http://www.periodictable.com/Elements/042/data.html CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics

ArthurPeron (talk) 14:05, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

•  Not done: The values given in the infobox are correct and up to date as of 2013 per CIAAW. Double sharp (talk) 14:33, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please add the ref to melting temperature: Paradis, P-F., T. Ishikawa, and S. Yoda. "Noncontact measurements of thermophysical properties of molybdenum at high temperatures." International journal of thermophysics 23.2 (2002): 555-569. Also add the value of Latent Heat of Fusion, 33.6 J/mol/K, from the same ref. 131.169.233.208 (talk) 12:21, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. None of the other elemental infoboxes display the Latent Heat of Fusion value, and I am unsure whether the ref can even be included. This is something that would need to be discussed with members of WP:CHEM. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 22:07, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why we need to add this other reference for the melting point value when our standard source (CRC 92nd ed.) provides exactly the same one. Double sharp (talk) 04:17, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]