Talk:Yakovlev AIR-3

A fact from Yakovlev AIR-3 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 July 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that the Soviet Union's Yakovlev AIR-3 aircraft was designed by a student? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2011/July.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Aircraft / Soviet This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by the aircraft project. This article is supported by the Soviet aviation task force.

I have a source which contradicts Shavrov and thus Nemecek on the PS.

My source states that Shavrov was mistaken in believing the transparent material to be Rhodoid, but was in stead cellon.This may well be just confusion of trade names.

Where my source differs fundamentally is the aircraft used in the experiment. My source states that one of the AIR-4 aircraft was used. This can be easily verified if there is a photo available, as the AIR-4 aircraft had split axle undercarriage, unlike the AIR-3's single live axle.Petebutt (talk) 18:25, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Interesting as you say it would be nice to find another source or an image to clear up if it was the 3 or 4. I have re-checked Nemecek and it says AIR-3. MilborneOne (talk) 18:33, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

i KEEP FINDING THE air-4 REFERRED TOAS THE SORIGIN OF THE ps, BUT NOt many PUBLISHED SOURCEs OR PHOTO YET. sHAVROV DID A STUPENDOUS JOB BUT HE WAS HOG-TIED BY THE sOVIET SYSTEM AND HAD ACCESS TO ONLY LIMITED MATERIAL. Errors in his works are many but understandable. One published w]reference is at [1] -

POLITECHNIKA RZESZOWSKA Wydział Budowy Maszyn i Lotnictwa
im. Ignacego Łukasiewicza Katedra Awioniki i Sterowania
TECHNOLOGIA STEALTH W LOTNICTWIE
Grzegorz LENART
eminarium Dyplomowe 2001/2002
LOTNICTWO - PILOTAŻ
Streszczenie

188.65.178.160 (talk) 13:16, 11 July 2011 (UTC)not logged inPetebutt (talk) 13:20, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have found a photo but it is of poor quality and the u/c is barely discernible and not conclusive. Go to [2] pg.83 Kozlov PS. Gunston also states that the PS was modified from an AIR-4. This is very likely for another reason, as the AIR-3 was built in 1929, so would have been a bag of nails by 1935, if it was still in one piece!Petebutt (talk) 14:30, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree with the logic that the second AIR-4 would be more likely, we could change it and use Gunston as a reference. MilborneOne (talk) 18:39, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I should have read your changes to the article first! - no problems with the changes, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 18:46, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]