Jump to content

Talk:Tanit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Section

[edit]

Tanit is a guess as to what this "sign" is called. The actual inscription is the typical semitic triconsonantal TNT and could also be "tenet" which is the secret language of the African metal workers. (Read about the language of the Inadan in Niger, Artisans of the Sahara in National Geographic, August 1979.)

I would argue that this is not a female form at all. Instead it represents the archaic cosmology of the African metal workers. The circle is the sun, the emblem of the creator God, El or Ba'al. The horizontal bar is the East-West movement of the sun (from his wife Dawn to his other wife Dusk). The sun resting over the mountain top represents the semitic belief that God reveals himself on mountain tops. A version of TNT is found today in the "Agadez cross" worked in silver by the Inadan and their metal working cousins, the Egene, both groups in west central Africa. It is not a cross in the Christian sense, but rather the metal workers' ancient representation of a self-revealing God over the cosmos.

Genesis 4:19 tells us that Lamech, the father of Tubal-Cain, the metal worker, had two wives. One was named Ada (Tasker points out the relationship of this name to Dawn) and the other Tzillah (suggesting Dusk). Abraham also had two wives: Sarah in Hebron and Keturah in Beersheba. The wives maintained separate households on a North-South axis out of reverence for El whose wives were on an East-West axis.

The Bible is full of incidents of meetings with God on mountain tops: Abraham binding his son, Moses finding the burning bush, Moses receiving the Tablets, Jesus' transfiguration. It was on mountain tops that clans who had become estranged were reunited. A covenant was made at Mount Horeb (Deut. 29:1) between the Israelites and their cousins the Midianites. Another was made in Seir on Mount Paran between the Israelites and the Edomites (Deut. 33:2) and a third was made on Mount Nebo between the Israelites and the Moabites (Deut. 29:1;32:49). The Midianites, the Edomites, the Moabites and the Israelites are all descended from Terah (Genesis 11).

Well , granted that Tanit is not well-known , I think there is not doubt about her existane.Pasha 01:57, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sigil of Tanit

[edit]

I think the symbol of Tanit on this page is not actually the most famous one , a more common form is an upward lunar cresent at the top of a triangle , can we perhaps add that one too?Pasha 01:54, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the image which is there is an adequate basic rendering of the older form of the symbol. AnonMoos 13:03, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Symbols make the world go around

[edit]

You know, the first thing that came to my mind when I looked at the Tanit sigil again was what's on the back on the dollar bill. Wishing you all a happy Novus Ordo...

Tanit is a Berber Goddes and not Phoenician

[edit]

The Berber Goddess Tanit. Tanit is regarded as one of the most famous and important Berber goddesses in Tripolitania. She is the wife of the Punic god Bal Hamon. She was the goddess of sowing, harvest and fertility, and a sky goddess essentially associated with the moon. Her symbol, known as the symbol of Tannit, is a triangle representing the human body, surmounted by a circle representing the head, and separated by a horizontal line which represents the hands. The worship of the goddess Tannit emerged after the 5th century BC. She appears to be of Libyan origin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.248.219.232 (talk) 20:30, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

She was clearly a Phoenician goddess. She was also worshipped by the Berbers. The sentence you changed was sourced, and the source says Phoenician, so you can't change that to say Berber. I believe you are quoting a website, we need academic sources. Dougweller (talk) 21:53, 28 February 2012 (UTC)77.248.219.232[reply]

77.248.219.232 (talk) 01:14, 29 February 2012 (UTC)Haha you must be kidding me right, becuase I don't have times for this very known fact that tanit was Berber Goddes of origin worshipped by others then only Berbers.[reply]

First of all there is no source which says that Tanit was Phoenician, there is absolutely no EVIDENCE of tanit inscriptions in whole of the Middle eats(Homeland of the Phoenicians).

Secondly you have any source, just a title of something which must be a book or something else? and the title talks about Phoenician and Punic INSCRIPTIONS. We can not check your source, so make sure we can.

ALL evidence found about Tanit is found in Libya, tunis and Egypt. But mainly in Libya and not in the Middle east. ALL historians a greed that the ancient Berbers were the first people known to have had the Goddes Tanit. Tannit is also a berber name, its berber LANGUAGE. Its a North African goddes. It has absolutely nothing to do with the middle eastern myths.

My source is 100% facts used by the BEST UNIVERSITIES ON THIS PLANET. The Cambridge History of Africa: From c. 500 B.C. to A.D. 1050 Link: http://books.google.nl/books?id=JAca1F3qG34C&pg=PA146&lpg=PA146&dq=Herodotus+berber+goddess+tanit&source=bl&ots=wXVDwzhBDA&sig=32p1RArH66PhDjb5vXFTJBsT9-Q&hl=nl&sa=X&ei=unZNT5qZIuyW0QWptNnADA&ved=0CEkQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=Herodotus%20berber%20goddess%20tanit&f=false

I am changing it back to berbers, this is clear and there is nothing Phoenician about tanit at all. 77.248.219.232 (talk) 01:14, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:VERIFY. It's not my source, and sources do not have to be on the web. Your source (which you haven't referenced properly. see WP:CITE says "became fused with those of sun-gods and ram-gods of purely Libyan origin. Of the Libyan moon deity, nothing can be said beyond what Herodotus himself states, unless the Carthaginian moon-goddess Tanit is, as has been suggested, a borrowing from the Libyans. Herodotus also states that the eastern Libyans venerated the Egyptian cow-goddess Isis, and observed the Egyptian prohibition on the meat of cows."
Read the article itself which talks about Tanit being a Phoenician goddess, eg "Her shrine excavated at Sarepta in southern Phoenicia revealed an inscription that identified her for the first time in her homeland and related her securely to the Phoenician goddess Astarte (Ishtar)". Your claim "not in the Middle east" is simply wrong.
Read pages 177 and 178 here [1] in Confronting the past: archaeological and historical essays on ancient Israel which explains how the speculation that her name had a Libyan origin was shown to be incorrect. And also says "The sign of Tanit appears on seals, seal impressions, bullae, and lead weights that are turning up in excavations at all the Phoenician coastal towns, from north to south, such as Byblos, Sarepta <biblical Zarcphalh. the town of the prophel Elijah) (Pntchard 1975: fig. 59:2), the Phoeni- cian temple at Umm el-'Amed (Rosh ha-Niqra), Acco (Do- than 1974). Dor (Stern 2000: 370). Ashdod Yam (Stern 1982: 216. tig. 363). and Ashkelon (Stager 1991; 31)." Dougweller (talk) 07:08, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly a Punic import, and not native to the Berbers. A point not explored in the article is that Berbers who ask for rain call non-irrigated agriculture ‘Baali’. Is this a reference to Baal, even though they are invoking Tanith? If so, the old deities seem to have hung on as a group. 213.205.200.48 (talk) 12:09, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

From Commons

[edit]

[Tanit was a Phoenician goddess, now well-known for the Tanit symbol or sign, which occurs in a number of archaeological contexts with variations of form, but usually includes a circle (representing the head) above a horizontal line (representing outstretched arms) above a trapezoid or triangle.

A lunar (moon) goddess, worshipped as the patron goddess at Carthage where from the fifth century BCE onwards her name is associated with that of Baal Hammon and she is given the epithet pene baal ("face of Baal") and the title rabat, the female form of rab (chief). Tanit was worshiped in Punic contexts in the Western Mediterranean, from Malta to Gades into Hellenistic times. In North Africa, where the inscriptions and material remains are more plentiful, she was, as well as a consort of Baal Hammon, a heavenly goddess of war, a virginal mother goddess and nurse, and, less specifically, a symbol of fertility. Several of the major Greek goddesses were identified with Tanit by the syncretic interpretatio graeca, which recognized as Greek deities in foreign guise the gods of most of the surrounding non-Hellene cultures. Tanit was venerated by the Romans, after the fall of Carthage, under the name of Juno Caelestis, and identified with their goddess Juno. Hvidberg-Hansen (Danish professor of Semitic philology), notes that Tanit is sometimes depicted with a lion's head, showing her warrior quality. -The Phoenician solar theology by Joseph Azize - Page 177

Her shrine excavated at Sarepta in southern Phoenicia revealed an inscription that identified her for the first time in her homeland and related her securely to the Phoenician goddess Astarte (Ishtar). One site where Tanit was uncovered is at Kerkouan, in the Cap Bon peninsula in Tunisia.] Error: {{Langx}}: text has italic markup (help) [2] by Camocon

--JMCC1 (talk) 19:23, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent revert

[edit]

I've just reverted User:Exacrion. One edit made a major change in sourced text - that shouldn't be done unless it can be shown that the original text was misrepresented. The other edits added material from B H Warmington's book - not sure which edition, but I think the latest was 1969, so too old to use for the purpose it was being used for. And if it had been recent, it would have had to be attributed to Warmington. Dougweller (talk) 15:36, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


To User:Dougweller: I found the text in wikipedia far too conclusive and expeditive about what was or what was not practiced in Punic Carthage in terms of religion. So far, researches at Carthage, showed that the tophet did contain remains of newborn and sometimes fetuses, but there is no sign of any sacrifice either. It was a common practice among near eastern civilizations (including the cultural imports Punics did from Phoenicia and Canaan), that children who died very young, received a special treatment at their funeral. They were also not considered a part of their family at this age. Adding to that, citing early Christian sources and nothing other is not receivable considering the subject, no more are early Romans or Greeks about Punic Carthage and their tendency to demonize everything different from or against them.
The scientific community at Carthage or even international is divided about the matter and it is very far to make unanimity in one way or another.
So even if my changes are not accepted as they are, the article still needs to be changed, be it at least for the sake of nuance and honesty. Exacrion (talk) 17:41, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Although I don't think a journalist is a reliable source, this article does have some leads to academic sources that look useful. Dougweller (talk) 19:02, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In addition, there is more unanimity among anthropologists about the consequences of Moloch-worship than you are allowing for, as the references in that article show.77.69.34.203 (talk) 07:29, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fine, bring some sources here. Doug Weller talk 14:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tank?

[edit]

This page "Tanit" is redirected from "Tank - Goddess", but no explanation is readily visible. Links still exist in articles that refer to "Tank" .... 61.68.160.96 (talk) 22:17, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greek name of Tanit

[edit]

<quote>The Greeks called her Tenneith or Tinnith and, as mentioned above, identified her with Hera, while the Romans named her Juno Caelestis.</quote>

https://www.academia.edu/24691657/Tanit_of_Carthage

--Komitsuki (talk) 13:14, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This whole article is written like somone taking personal offense

[edit]

I can't be the only one who notices. 222.108.156.194 (talk) 01:51, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicting and outdated info

[edit]

From Hammon being called a "local libyan deity" even though we have evidence of his cult in Phoenicia, with the most likely etymology being he's the lord of Mt. Amanus with an inscription dedicated to him found in Umm al-‘Awamid, to Tanit both being considered not originating or equal to Astarte, and being treated as one and the same.

This article is a total mess Himeaimichu (talk) 10:34, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

that is a very valid theory, to my knowledge there are 3 main currents to the origin of the name:
-Frank Moore Cross argued for a connection to Hamon, the Ugaritic name for Mount Amanus, a peak in the Nur Mountains which separate Syria from Cilicia. In the 19th century, when Ernest Renan excavated the ruins of Hammon (Hammon), the modern Umm al-‘Awamid between Tyre and Acre, he found two Phoenician inscriptions dedicated to El-Hammon.
-Others have proposed Hammon as a syncretic association with Libyan-Egyptian god Amun. the story of Dido's founding of Carthage mentions King Iarbas who is said to be the son of Ammon (Jupiter)
-While a last current has called instead for a connection with the Northwest Semitic word Hamman ("brazier"), suggesting the sense "Lord of the Brazier".
This article takes Libyan and Punic Tanit as the consort of the Libyan god Amon in North africa, I don't mind at all if you add his possible ugarit origins.
Concerning Astarte, I agree with you entirely, whoever equated Astarte to Tanit must have been under the pretense that since both are goddesses of war therefore they must be the same, the article is unfinished and I am reading on both deities to help improve the article, I would love for us to work together to achieve this end.
Let me know if you find any interesting data or stories about Tanit to improve the article. it would be very helpful. Potymkin (talk) 12:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In ancient societies, there were all kinds of syncretism, Interpretatio graeca and similar between different pagan deities. If all the gods worshipped by another people were completely different from the gods worshipped by your own people, then that meant that the two groups were culturally utterly alien to each other.... AnonMoos (talk) 16:19, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
certainly so you are correct, the main issue with this page was that the page talks about Tanit, someone filled the page with so much talk about Astarte that the page no longer become about Tanit alone and became mixed and confusing, I am hoping to expand the article to discuss Tanit. Potymkin (talk) 16:49, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
From what I know, we do have concrete evidence of Ba'al Hammon being worshiped in the Levant itself, with evidence at Umm al-'Awaimid, although I do think the Lord of the Brazier or an adaptation of Amun from Egypt are certainly possible; the former doesn't suggest geographical location, and the latter is plausible because many Egyptian gods were worshiped in Phoenicia due to centuries of Egyptian rule. But the idea of Amazigh origin just feels super unlikely given that he seems to pre-date the expansion of the Phoenicians into Africa. Then again, there were also Amazighs under Egyptian rule and given that we had Egyptians in the Levant and Levantine peoples in Egypt, I guess Amazigh presence isn't entirely out of the picture lol.
I do actually consider the possibility that Tanit and Astarte might have been syncretized, given we do have an inscription "𐤕𐤍𐤕𐤏𐤔𐤕𐤓𐤕‎ (Tinnit-ʿAštart)" found at Sarepta, which is also the location for her earliest attestations in general. My main issue is the article cannot agree with itself on the topic and clearly conflicts itself lol. A lot of the article on both sides seems to draw from very old school, possibly outdated assumptions. In any case, it certainly is clear that Tanit is influenced by Astarte, given that she shares the title "Face of Ba'al" with Astarte, and is influenced by her symbolism. I actually have never seen concrete symbolism of Astarte in any Carthaginian artifact, but that's probably because I'm a beginner in all this and have not seen the artifacts lol. A lot of the stuff on Astarte lists her symbols as being the star, dove, lion, etc., but don't cite any evidence. It's casually thrown around lol.
This is why I really want these articles to improve, so I can learn better and bounce off to do my own specific research, since I'm just a beginner enthusiast lol. Himeaimichu (talk) 23:01, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is very wonderful to meet someone who is well read upon deities and their worship around the mediterranean and thats a very good thing.
the Article does not claim that Baal Hammon is a North African Deity entirely, it shows very clearly and I quote "as Ammon is a local Libyan deity", here the talk is about ammon the libyan god, Baal-Hammon conglomeration between the Canaanite God Baal and the North African god Ammon has resulted in a deity known as Baal-Hammon and is first purely mentionned in North africa and nowhere else, the combination of two deities resulted in one god Baal-Hammon and is North African in Origin.
whether Hammon was worshipped in the levant before Baal Hammon before Carthage or not (the inscriptions in Srepta which were not dated to my knowledge) is of no matter, because Baal-Hammon and Hammon are not the same deity, this combination only first occured in north africa in carthage unless sourced otherwise.
It is not uncommon in North Africa for Amon to be combined, it occured several times including Ammon-Ra, Zeus-Ammon and Baal-Hammon so this puts the idea as more than likely that Baal was combined with Ammon in this instance.
Concerning Astarte and Tanit, the two goddesses represent different goddesses, where tanit is the goddess of wisdom, fertility, weaving, goddess of the olive tree and the virgin mother goddess, protectress of civilization and homes where she is worshipped, the godess of wars of defence, herodotus and Appollodorus and Ovid and others give account to her origins from north africa specifically in Lake tritonis, they talk of her as the goddess of libyans whom by she was worshipped long before any other.
Astarte in contrast is purely the godess of wars of aggression, she is portrayed as knee deep in blood of her enemies, she lacks all aspects of wisdom, virginity and weaving, she is blood thirsty and engages in gruesome acts against those she wants punished for wrong doing, in one story she taunts her lovers to death. she represents anti-virginity, aggressive sexual tendencies.
This article focuses on Tanit as the goddess of North Africa, born out of Libya in all the aspects she represented of which we know of from Both Historians from the time, ancient egyptians as well as modern archeology, Ishtar has her own wikipedia page relating to her Ugarit origins and character.
If you find any interesting stories or aspects of tanit you would like to note please include it in this article about Tanit. Potymkin (talk) 09:28, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]