Talk:River-class offshore patrol vessel

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles Military history: Maritime / British / European This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force British military history task force European military history task force

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/river_class/

  Triggered by \bnaval-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 10:41, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 19:49, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The new OPVs https://www.gov.uk/government/news/first-steel-cut-on-new-patrol-ships are hardly close to the River Class. Unless others object, I will soon reword that section. It is not Batch 3 but a new class with first ship named HMS Forth.Phd8511 (talk) 13:08, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HMS Forth was floated off the launch barge into the water over Sat/Sun Aug-21 2016- well before any official ceremony. Does that count as the 'launch' date? (its now in the fitting out dock) - See pic on BAE Systems Maritime twitter feed https://twitter.com/BAES_Maritime/status/767738733202255873 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 20.133.0.13 (talk) 16:08, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the ceremony can happen before, during or after launch. So evidently she has been launched. But I think we could do with a source as to when the actual date is. Rob984 (talk) 16:25, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was just watching an interview^[1] with Lt Commander Steve Banfield, commanding HMS Severn, from 2015.

At 1:13 seconds he gives the following stats for his Batch 1 ship. Displacement: 1,800 tonnes; Length: 80m; Company: 35; Max Speed: 21kn; Range: 15,000 mi

The extra 100 tonnes, extra knot and 5 extra complement are all no biggy, but the range discrepency is huge! 5,500nm is the published figure, far less than the 13,000nm the captain claims. Was that a slip? Jonh333 (talk) 10:58, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If it were an aircraft -- which of course it is not -- then one would be considering the possibility of one of the figures being the combat radius or similar, and one being the ferry range or similar, which would explain the second figure being more than double the first. MPS1992 (talk) 20:06, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

They're overkill for dealing with foreign fishing vessels poaching in our waters, they're not fast enough to deal with people or drugs smugglers or pirates (who presumably would use much faster vessels) and they're woefully underarmed to patrol the waters around the Falklands. Why were these vessels ever built? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.25.65.57 (talk) 18:16, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]