Talk:Peking (ship)

	This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

I question the use of ignominious existence. This is a value judgement that is unbalanced. What is the source.

The other point of view was that she was instrumental to improving the life chance of generations of boys who without her would not have led successful lives in the Merchant or Royal Navy. Her role at Upnor prevented her being broken for scrap so she could be bought by her current owners. ClemRutter 01:12, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice change- does the infobox need a title? ClemRutter (talk) 09:57, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pekingship.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:49, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removed Military History tag as subject of the article was not a military vessel and was never used as such. It was awarded as part of reparations, but is not notable for that reason. --dashiellx (talk) 20:11, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A short scene in The Secret of My Success (1987 film) is set on the Peking. It shows the main character on his first date with his future girlfriend. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.189.21.109 (talk) 19:48, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

At the moment commented out. Great idea but needs to be more focussed and copyedited. ClemRutter (talk) 17:48, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Peking (ship). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071121073129/http://www.southstseaport.org/index1.aspx?BD=8995 to http://www.southstseaport.org/index1.aspx?BD=8995

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:39, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• Peking2018.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:07, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Peking in Wewelsfleth.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:21, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]