Talk:Oxford University Handball Club

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 March 2021. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

University of Oxford This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

I object to the deletion, which is why I deleted the template. The anonymous user claims that the article is not relevant, but the OUHaC has won the National league in 2006 and participated in European championships. There are many other English handball club with less information in their articles and fewer titles inernational games, and they have not been labelled. There are also many other articles about Oxford Uni sport teams that have not been flagged for deletion either. Also, I think the anonymous user has been targetting maliciously Oxofrd Uniersity sports pages for deletion.--Xaverius 09:38, 12 March 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xaverius (talk • contribs)

Hello. I believe it is subject to deletion because it fails to meet our notability standards. As the prod stated: "No evidence that this meets wp notability standards". Not because it is not relevant.

Where do you find support in our guidelines for what you point to being evidence of notability?

Also, correctly or incorrectly, the fact that there is or is not another wp article that is similar or less notable is of no moment under wp guidelines.

Also, please see the guideline on AGF.

Just because there may be a number of non notable articles in a sphere, does not make their tagging a sign of maliciousness. And there is no maliciousness here. Nor do I say that your arguments are impacted by a POV relating to the university. 2603:7000:2143:8500:40E5:C46D:4560:BA39 (talk) 20:26, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I just normally assume that edits done by non-registered users are malicious. And what do wp AGF stand for?--Xaverius 15:06, 13 March 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xaverius (talk • contribs)

• Assume good faith. 2603:7000:2143:8500:746F:5787:2314:6A0D (talk) 23:45, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion is proposed because there is no evidence that this meets wp notability standards. An editor removed a prod. But none of the reasons presented by the editor changed that view. --2603:7000:2143:8500:40E5:C46D:4560:BA39 (talk) 20:35, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]