Talk:Mechanism (engineering)

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Engineering Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Technology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles Robotics Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contents of the Mechanism (technology) page were merged into Mechanism (engineering) on November 2009. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

This article was selected as the article for improvement on 1 July 2024 for a period of one week.

Wanted to suggest my YouTube video clip as an external link for the article. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYq_0v66ucM It depicts various Kinematic Pairs mentioned in the article in motion. The clip is my own creation and does not violet any copyrights. Appreciate you time in reviewing this. Kindly let me know if such links are acceptable or if not, what changes could make them so.

Thank you. 202.71.137.98 (talk) 07:27, 2 February 2011 (UTC) Ujjwal Rane[reply]

I had written quite a bit about mechanisms for machine (mechanical) before I knew about this article, so I copied some of the sections to this article. I know it duplicates the material somewhat, but I believe it is important. I have seen this duplication in other areas such as on rotation matrices. It is not ideal but I hope because the material is fundamental, it is not a problem. Prof McCarthy (talk) 06:34, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I hope it is ok that I increased the settings of the quality of this article a little. Prof McCarthy (talk) 07:19, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mechanism (engineering). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110916005925/http://kmoddl.org/machinesandmechanisms/index.php/Machines_and_Mechanisms to http://kmoddl.org/machinesandmechanisms/index.php/Machines_and_Mechanisms

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:33, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]