Talk:Isotopes of gold

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Elements: Isotopes Low‑importance This article is supported by WikiProject Elements, which gives a central approach to the chemical elements and their isotopes on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing this article, or visit the project page for more details.ElementsWikipedia:WikiProject ElementsTemplate:WikiProject Elementschemical elements articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by the Isotope Taskforce.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Isotopes of gold. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://web.missouri.edu/~kattik/katti/katres.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:34, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Isotopes of gold. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080923135135/http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf to http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080923135135/http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf to http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:13, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to add that the W71 ABM warhead used a gold secondary tamper for its high x-ray emmisitivity, as x-rays were the kill mechanism for this weapon. Clarification in the W71 article.

I have grouped the 3 non-table, non-footer sections together because they all discuss the same isotope, ¹⁹⁸Au. I am also proposing that the combined section be split off into a separate article, Gold-198, because ¹⁹⁸Au appears to be independently notable, e.g. [1]. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:37, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a good idea. Enough references in the section. While you are at it, could you expand the medicine application part? I'm missing the explicit compound used in med. -DePiep (talk) 16:06, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done It seems to pass WP:GNG; I created the article. Now, it needs expansion from the many sources that refer to it. ComplexRational (talk) 22:46, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

²⁰⁶Au is potentially capable of alpha decay. Note that the alpha decay energy is only 136.7 keV. 129.104.241.214 (talk) 11:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]