Talk:Fort Myer

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance). Military history: North America / United States This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  North American military history task force United States military history task force National Register of Historic Places High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Virginia Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in Virginia may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

I had read "someplace" that Orville "discovered" the stall here when he crashed. It seems odd now, but the mechanics of flying-but-not-quite-flying may not have been considered except on paper up to that point. I've left a note on the stall (aviation) discussion. Student7 (talk) 14:54, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hum... I have some reliable sources stating that Wilbur Wright came across stalls for the first time in 1901, while flying his second glider. A stall had been the cause of Otto Lilienthal's death in 1896 and, being more or less aware of such fact, the Wrights decided to build their planes in "canard" configuration. This actually helped making recoveries from stalls easier and more gentle, saving the brothers' lives more than once (see here). Instead, the accident at Fort Myer on September 17, 1908 was due to the breaking of a propeller in-flight; the fragments of the propeller damaged the tail, which collapsed and caused a the airplane to dive into the ground (see here). Hope this was helpful (and sorry for my English) --MLWatts (talk) 13:10, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just put your research, attributed, on the stall (aviation) page as "history." Thanks for your research! Student7 (talk) 13:38, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is not obvious from the description that not all of the listed 'installations' are contiguous. In fact Ft. Myer (Army), Henderson Hall (Marine), The Navy Annex, The Pentagon, and National Cemetery are contiguous real estate. Ft. McNair, the Wash. Navy Yard, etc. are not.
--Wikidity (talk) 21:15, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that they aren't contiguous. I'm missing where we claimed that they were "contiguous." We meant to claim that they were all in the DC area. Could you furnish an example/quote where we said they were "contiguous". Thanks. Student7 (talk) 19:04, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

While guards are mentioned as being stationed here, there appears to be no list. I suggest that there be a "main" list someplace, if that long, or listed here. To suggest that a given unit is "already covered" by some vague term is really insufficient IMO. Student7 (talk) 18:57, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The 'guards' you are referring to is the nickname of an actual unit: 3rd U.S. Infantry Regiment (The Old Guard), and the specifics of that unit are covered in an article specifically on that unit (which is linked in the Ft. Myer article). The garrisoned specifics in the case of the Ft. Myer article aren't necessary for inclusion seeing as the units themselves aren't the subject of the article (the subject is Fort Myer), and in any case, the Fife & Drum Corp is still part of the Old Guard, which would make it redundant to mention the unit twice. Hope that clears things up for you. Ryecatcher773 (talk) 16:34, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fort Myer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120711210303/http://www.jbmhh.army.mil/JBMHHhomepage.html to http://www.jbmhh.army.mil/JBMHHhomepage.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:13, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This date could not represent the date of the inspection. The Regiment 1st Massachusetts Heavy Artillery left the forts on May 15 to participate in Grant's Overland Campaign and Harris Farm Engagement. Buffalohead (talk) 14:24, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The 1864 report quote seems to be formatted strangely. It’s unreadable on an iPad in portrait mode although it’s readable in landscape mode. MarylandGeoffrey (talk) 22:50, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]