This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War
The article is very well written with proper structure, inline citations and grammer. There were no problems that I could see with external links. I ran the article through AWB and only came up with a few items that I corrected. I hope you don't mind. I checked the images and they all look ok. There in one disambiguous link for Salient but nothing to hold the article back from being promoted in my opinion. Well done. --Kumioko (talk) 15:33, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
Reviewer:Kumioko (talk) 15:33, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I thought about that but I couldn't find the names of each company at the time so I thought it best to stick to the conservative names. —Ed!(talk)21:43, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]