Talk:Dorothy P. Rice

A news item involving Dorothy P. Rice was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 7 March 2017.

Dorothy P. Rice has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 20, 2017. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance). Medicine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Statistics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Women's History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women scientists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women in Red: #1day1woman (2021) This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2021. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red

While giving its subject's birthplace and date, this article says nothing about her family or even what her birth name was. This is a big hole. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 21:01, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Piledhigheranddeeper: Thank you for adding the info. :-) Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 02:51, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Dorothy P. Rice/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:16, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take a look and make straightforward copyedits as I go and jot queries below:

• Err, it's lead is a bit small...actually the article is pretty slim overall. Looking over some sources, there are some more biographical facts that can be added, see here that mentions her parents were Jewish immigrants from Poland, and here which covers her legacy better. Anyway, I would feel more comfortable if it's been fleshed out a little more.
  • Thanks, Casliber. Will work on this ASAP now that I'm back editing! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 04:13, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • No dramas...Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:41, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• • • @The ed17: ...pinnnngggg Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:48, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      • @Casliber: Sorry for the delay! I've added what I can from Google Books and my university's library resources. Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:09, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
        • @The ed17: ...aaaand the lead? Just a little bigger then....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:59, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
          • @Casliber: Sorry about that! Expanded now. :-) Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 02:42, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:

Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:

Citations to reliable sources, where required:

No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:

Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:

Pass or Fail: - neat little article. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:08, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]