Jump to content

Talk:Ceechynaa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 talk 16:49, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Benmite (talk) and Paradisetoshutdown (talk). Number of QPQs required: 2. Nominator has 261 past nominations.

Launchballer 00:11, 17 December 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: My issue is some of the sources not supporting the text it's cited with; on Ceechynaa's page, the source cited with the sentence "Prior to starting her rap career..." doesn't mention her Onlyfans stage name or her previous work as a waitress. The following source with the next sentence (the Vogue interview) does mention it, so please cite information with the source mentioning it. I'd also remove the onlyfans part and replace it with "worked in adult entertainment" as that's what Chyna herself has stated in the Vogue interview.

Some text is not cited to a source, such as her inspiration being Nicki Minaj (again attributed to the Vogue interview), so please cite every statement. "She has stated that her lyrics.." another unsourced statement. Please also cite "Her UK drill songs are known for her use of her Essex accent and for their assertive lyrics, which often take aim at men and gender roles." in the lead.

For Peggy (Ceechynaa song), I'd recommend changing "The song and music video gained a lot of attention online" to "The song and music video gained online attention due to its provocative nature" or something similar to avoid redundancy and explain why exactly it garnered attention. The writers & producers for the song mentioned in the "music and lyrics" section should be cited.

The citation supporting sentence "As well, Goulding captioned her video with "outrageous and here for it" is absolutely not a reliable source in my opinion. Twitter is already a controversial source, but a pop-culture update account known for catering towards stan twitter should not be considered. Thought social media sources are generally weak sources, a post by Goulding would be more reliable as a source than a tweet by a fan update account.

Overall, please address these issues (mainly citation) before the article can be considered for a DYK nomination. jolielover♥talk 10:45, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The QPQ is a double nom. I'll get to the rest of these when I get back.--Launchballer 11:21, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, I overdid it yesterday, so this is going to be very slow work. I'll ping you when I'm done.--Launchballer 15:03, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jolielover: Think I've done everything.--Launchballer 13:46, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Launchballer: Just checked, everything seems fine and ready to go! jolielover♥talk 13:54, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Would you mind annotating this with a symbol then @Jolielover:?--Launchballer 18:54, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Launchballer: annotating what? jolielover♥talk 03:04, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I meant this review, but I see now that {{DYK checklist}} already did that, so never mind.--Launchballer 03:17, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]