Talk:Carole Bamford

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: Keep, 12 September 2021, see discussion. keep, 18 August 2012, see discussion.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Business Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women in Business Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article reads like and advert / press release. That needs to be modified to be in line Wikipedia's policy of articles adhering to a neutral point of view. -- Whpq (talk) 18:25, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article wrongly claimed Lady Bamford and Sir Anthony founded JCB, with citation, however clearly the company was infact founded by its name-sake, and father to Anthony, Joseph Cyril Bamford. I have removed this reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.186.244.250 (talk) 18:18, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Carole Bamford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wmagazine.com/society/2007/12/lady_bamford
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://ukinmontserrat.fco.gov.uk/en/news/?view=PressR&id=634274682
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120706074640/http://www.globalgreen.org:80/articles/global/48 to http://www.globalgreen.org/articles/global/48

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:01, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This article still reads like spam, with whole uncited sections. The claims are grandiose - but are there cites that aren't in deprecated sources for all of this? - David Gerard (talk) 23:38, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored the version from before Duderood's work, which he states was as coordinated with the article subject. I suggest we start again from this - David Gerard (talk) 07:49, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To editor David Gerard: Impressive dedication to rationalising the tripe. It's been a pleasure to watch you work. Iskandar323 (talk) 07:56, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]