Jump to content

Talk:Beta Aurigae

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 31 March 2006

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was don't move. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 07:23, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]

Beta Aurigae → Menkalinan – {propor name — Hurricane Devon ( Talk ) 03:14, 31 March 2006 (UTC)} copied from the entry on the WP:RM page[reply]

Survey

[edit]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Beta Aurigae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:38, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 14 November 2023

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) -- Maddy from Celeste (WAVEDASH) 18:53, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Beta AurigaeMenkalinan – More common name and easy to remember than the Bayer designation per provisional names that are usually preferred than the latter. JeBonSer (talk | sign) 15:12, 14 November 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Reading Beans (talk) 19:13, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Beta Aurigae in its various forms (Beta Aurigae[5], Beta Aur[6], β Aurigae[7], β Aur[8]), seems more popular than the Arabic name [9], but as a form independently, it is more popular than any single Bayer form -- 65.92.247.90 (talk) 13:40, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per above, Beta Aurigae is the more common name. SevenSpheres (talk) 16:45, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support: The first page of Google Scholar results I see for "Beta Aurigae", as linked above, are from 1911, 1994, 1948, 1971, 1898, 1910, 1948, 1968, 1968 again, and 1904. The first page I see for "Menkalinan" are from 1998, 2019, 2012, 2021, 2013, 2022, 2011, 2012, 2013 again, and 2023. Granted, this is not at all a representative sample, and the fact that it's Google-based means it's skewed towards articles posted on the Internet, but there does seem to be a clear preference for "Menkalinan" over "Beta Aurigae" in recent use.
(Results for "β Aurigae" are more mixed; some are more recent and others are older. The overall number of articles using this form, though, is much smaller.) 3 kids in a trenchcoat (talk) 04:04, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.