Talk:Among Us
Among Us has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 22, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Among Us article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Among Us" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for Among Us:
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Unmentioned things
[edit]The article doesn't mention that in hide and seek mode, you can vent a limited amount of times, depending on the settings. The article also does not mention that there is a host to each game, that can change the settings and choose when to start the game while waiting in the lobby. Sorry for being an among us nerd, but I just wanted to put it out there. Thanks! 😁 50.5.251.78 (talk) 21:23, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Incorrect information
[edit]In "Chicken nugget auction" the article states "Several TikTokers and QAnon-adjacent conspiracy theorists promoted misinformation and rumors claiming that the high price of the listing was a front for child sex trafficking", where the italics imply the conspiracy theorists are part of QAnon, where as in the source it is made clear she "was a TikToker known for posting QAnon and QAnon-adjacent conspiracy theories", meaning conspiracy theories about QAnon, not a member of QAnon who was a conspiracy theorist. AnOldSky (talk) 13:56, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- I don't understand your remark. The article doesn't use italics and it says "QAnon-adjacent conspiracy theorists", meaning exactly what you said. Adjacent, not part of. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 14:46, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- I added the italics to emphasize the part that I was specifically talking about, but my point was that the word adjacent implies something being related to or suggestive of something else, and while not technically incorrect, this language is ambiguous and would generally be understood to mean that the conspiracy theorists are related to QAnon in the sense that they agree with them but are not part of the group, when in fact they promote conspiracy theories about QAnon. If, for example, you said someone had a blog which promotes football-adjacent messages, it would be generally understood that they wrote about their favorite players or analyzed play, not that they wrote about the dangers of the sport and how it should be outlawed, which, while still not technically incorrect, the implied support of "adjacent" could easily be clarified disambiguate the stance of the person. AnOldSky (talk) 16:42, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Video games good articles
- GA-Class video game articles
- Mid-importance video game articles
- GA-Class indie game articles
- Indie video game task force articles
- WikiProject Video games articles
- GA-Class science fiction articles
- Low-importance science fiction articles
- WikiProject Science Fiction articles
- GA-Class Internet culture articles
- Mid-importance Internet culture articles
- WikiProject Internet culture articles
- WikiProject Apps
- GA-Class apps articles
- Low-importance apps articles
- WikiProject Apps articles
- Wikipedia pages with to-do lists
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report