Talk:Adelolophus

Adelolophus has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 29, 2021. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Dinosaurs Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Palaeontology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Adelolophus/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: FunkMonk (talk · contribs) 15:22, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• As stated in the peer review, I think this is pretty close to GA level, but I'll have a last look over it to see if there's anything to add. FunkMonk (talk) 15:22, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Well, the changes look good, so the only think I noticed now is that you seem to have a few British spellings, though being a US subject, it should preferably be US spelling. Examples include honour instead of honor, and palaeo instead of paleo, there could be more. FunkMonk (talk) 21:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not entirely familiar with US spelling, so there might be some I'm not seeing. I fixed the two you pointed out. LittleLazyLass (Talk | Contributions) 20:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• You could perhaps state the occupations of the people mentioned.

Not sure if I can find a source for that. It's not something that tends to be stated in a paper. LittleLazyLass (Talk | Contributions) 20:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you need a source for that kind of stuff anyway, I just Google the people involved when I add occupation or nationality, or take it from their Wikipedia articles. I think it falls under Wikipedia:You don't need to cite that the sky is blue. But it isn't really a big deal if you don't want to add it. FunkMonk (talk) 01:17, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Did you see this, LittleLazyLass? FunkMonk (talk) 22:22, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I did not! I'll get right to it. LittleLazyLass (Talk | Contributions) 22:32, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Can we find the full name of H.D. Zeller?

Google scholar gives some geology results for a Howard D. Zeller, that's probably him. Wikidata says he was a geologist. LittleLazyLass (Talk | Contributions) 04:01, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think this article is enough of a give away to spell it out: Reconnaissance for uranium-bearing carbonaceous materials in southern Utah by: Howard Davis Zeller FunkMonk (talk) 07:18, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll just add that myself and promote the article. FunkMonk (talk) 15:54, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]