Jump to content

User contributions for JSFarman

A user with 20,886 edits. Account created on 30 January 2012.
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

14 February 2025

13 February 2025

11 February 2025

10 February 2025

9 February 2025

8 February 2025

7 February 2025

6 February 2025

5 February 2025

  • 05:5105:51, 5 February 2025 diff hist +415 Talk:Arbonne International Edited to conform to sources and neutral POV current Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
  • 05:4405:44, 5 February 2025 diff hist −1,680 Arbonne International See previous edit summaries; I had two windows open and did not previously delete the content specified. current Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
  • 05:3005:30, 5 February 2025 diff hist +1,510 Arbonne International Deleted "Lawsuits have been filed against Arbonne concerning discrimination" and replaced it with the fact from the source; deleted content about FTC warning, added the text of the warning, which was sent to 10 companies, and replaced the referenced used (which did not mention Arbonne) with the correct reference. Deleted second mention of lawsuit. Tag: Visual edit
  • 05:0705:07, 5 February 2025 diff hist −1,737 Arbonne International Deleted statement about accusations of pyramid scheme (see previous summary) and deleted "A 2006 article in The Virginian-Pilot questioned the proper AIRD not having their own facilities was proper and noted that chemist Pierre Bottiglieri might have worked for multiple companies besides Arbonne.[1] - there is no context and the sentence does not make sense. Bloomberg ref - why? (WP:SYNTH) Tag: Visual edit
  • 04:5804:58, 5 February 2025 diff hist +569 Arbonne International Deleted "Independent consultants are not employees and are viewed differently by the United States Internal Revenue Service." The ref does not mention Arbonne, and there is no reason to include information on the employment status of independent consultants. Tag: Visual edit
  • 04:5304:53, 5 February 2025 diff hist −947 Arbonne International I read this article looking for information about the company and instead found a poorly referenced article that relies on WP:SYNTH. Deleted They have been accused of being a pyramid scheme[12][13] due to their strong emphasis on recruitment.[14]; none of the references cited accuse the company of being a pyramid scheme. (Also, Vice is not a reliable source, and the ref titled "FTC" is a 408p doc uploaded by "spirtualbeing") Tag: Visual edit

4 February 2025

3 February 2025

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)