User contributions for Daff22

15:2015:20, 4 December 2024 diff hist +362 Talk:J. K. Rowling →Rowling and Barbra Banda: Reply
15:1715:17, 4 December 2024 diff hist −40 J. K. Rowling Undid revision 1261119632 by Arbeiten8 (talk) Remove inappropriate category current Tag: Undo

08:0408:04, 3 December 2024 diff hist +268 Talk:Allison Bailey →Disputed category – Anti-transgender activists: Reply
08:0208:02, 3 December 2024 diff hist −40 Allison Bailey Undid revision 1260582117 by DanielRigal (talk) Revert to status-quo while Talk page discussion ongoing. Tag: Undo

13:1413:14, 1 December 2024 diff hist −40 Moira Deeming Undid revision 1260351879 by TarnishedPath (talk) Remove inappropriate category Tags: Undo Reverted
13:1313:13, 1 December 2024 diff hist −40 Category:J. K. Rowling Remove inappropriate categorisation Tags: Manual revert Reverted
13:0913:09, 1 December 2024 diff hist −40 Magdalen Berns Undid revision 1260349327 by Web-julio (talk) Remove inappropriate category Tags: Undo Reverted
13:0813:08, 1 December 2024 diff hist −41 Stephanie Davies-Arai Undid revision 1260350294 by Web-julio (talk) Remove inappropriate caregory Tags: Undo Reverted
13:0613:06, 1 December 2024 diff hist −40 Allison Bailey →References: Remove inappropriate category Tag: Reverted

07:2707:27, 22 November 2024 diff hist +10 Queen of the Ring (film) Add runtime current

19:3319:33, 20 November 2024 diff hist +605 Talk:Kishwer Falkner, Baroness Falkner of Margravine →New chair being sought: Reply current Tag: Reply
09:5809:58, 20 November 2024 diff hist +569 Talk:Kishwer Falkner, Baroness Falkner of Margravine →New chair being sought: Replies

16:1216:12, 18 November 2024 diff hist +688 Talk:Kishwer Falkner, Baroness Falkner of Margravine →New chair being sought: Reply
10:0210:02, 18 November 2024 diff hist +10 Equality and Human Rights Commission →Leadership: Context current
10:0110:01, 18 November 2024 diff hist −19 Kishwer Falkner, Baroness Falkner of Margravine →EHRC head: Contextualize, and remove irrelevant comment for this article.

14:5314:53, 28 October 2024 diff hist −24,662 Laurel Lance (Arrowverse) Undid revision 1221136679 by 2603:8000:702:127B:5400:766D:56AB:9139 (talk) Remove content dump from Arrowverse wiki Tag: Undo

18:2218:22, 25 October 2024 diff hist −15 NXT (WWE brand) Undid revision 1253382195 by 188.162.228.159 (talk) Tag: Undo

08:2808:28, 23 October 2024 diff hist −184 Arrow (TV series) Undid revision 1252870084 by 203.189.118.183 (talk) Tag: Undo

10:1110:11, 7 October 2024 diff hist +38 Cass Review →Reception: Moving response - this is appears to be an article published in the journal, not a statement from the organisation itself. It refers to a report by the organisation, but that was published in 2020. Added nationality of organisation for clarity. Tag: Reverted

12:5912:59, 3 October 2024 diff hist +564 Christy Martin →Legacy: Add

06:3606:36, 1 October 2024 diff hist −40 J. K. Rowling Undid revision 1248662083 by Doomdorm64 (talk) Remove inapplicable category Tag: Undo

12:1612:16, 28 September 2024 diff hist +218 Time to Think (book) Add awards to lede
12:1012:10, 28 September 2024 diff hist +554 Time to Think (book) →Awards: Add award Tag: Reverted
09:3409:34, 28 September 2024 diff hist −153 Cass Review Remove reference to Hilary Cass elevated to Lords - the article is about the review, not Dr Cass. Also, lede follows body, and I don't see this in the body.
09:3009:30, 28 September 2024 diff hist +8 Cass Review →Response from health bodies in the United Kingdom: Firstly, it is important to be clear that this is a change in the BMA's position. Secondly, while the BBC source works fine, just to note, it is not up to individual editors to declare that an award-winning journalist, in this particular topic area, is unilaterally an "non-neutral" source for this page.

11:0711:07, 27 September 2024 diff hist +6 Cass Review →Response from health bodies in the United Kingdom: Changing terminology to match source

15:2715:27, 23 September 2024 diff hist +7 Elaine Miller Slight reword and reorder of lede for flow.
15:2415:24, 23 September 2024 diff hist −15 Elaine Miller Very little in the article relates to gender critical activism, so relocating in list. SLight reword of second sentence
15:1915:19, 23 September 2024 diff hist +3 Elaine Miller Missing word
15:1915:19, 23 September 2024 diff hist +152 Elaine Miller Add more from body to lede
15:1315:13, 23 September 2024 diff hist +14 Elaine Miller Change wording to reflect content of article, and per WP:NPOV
15:0215:02, 23 September 2024 diff hist +48 Elaine Miller Add refs from body to lede
14:5814:58, 23 September 2024 diff hist −613 Elaine Miller Remove sentence from lede not found in body - again, lede follows body. Both sources provided appear to be about harassment Miller received, rather than criticism of her. Someone else is welcome to find other sources, or work that content into the body, but it does not belong in the lede alone.
14:5414:54, 23 September 2024 diff hist −26 Elaine Miller Awards are mentioned in body - lede follow body
14:5314:53, 23 September 2024 diff hist −9 Elaine Miller →Career: Past tense, added context.
14:4914:49, 23 September 2024 diff hist −19 Elaine Miller No clear reason why gender-critical was italicised. Removing redundant self-described descriptor.

09:2709:27, 21 September 2024 diff hist +180 Talk:Cass Review →International: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
09:0009:00, 21 September 2024 diff hist +416 Talk:Cass Review →International Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
08:5708:57, 21 September 2024 diff hist −8 Cass Review Removing word added in previous edit - I understand this is understandable discussion but the way it was written here doesn't even make sense, and is not reflected in the article. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

12:3512:35, 19 September 2024 diff hist +304 Cass Review Undid revision 1246516865 by Snokalok (talk) Revert - inclusion of this bodies response has not been discussed on the Talk page. Please see my comment there before reverting again. The content as it is now presented is not done so in relation to the BMA content, but simply as a statement of fact. Tag: Undo
12:2712:27, 19 September 2024 diff hist +379 Talk:Cass Review →Who stripped away the BMA content?: Comment
12:2312:23, 19 September 2024 diff hist +304 Cass Review →Response from health bodies in the United Kingdom: Adding in response from significant UK medical body removed in last edit - see talk on BMA Tag: Reverted

09:4809:48, 18 September 2024 diff hist −19 J. K. Rowling Revert - per note on Talk page Tag: Undo

16:3816:38, 17 September 2024 diff hist −5 Cass Review A number of organizations welcoming the recommendations implies there is a number that haven't, whereas the article itself demonstrates that it has been welcomed by almost all. Adjusting wording to reflect that.
16:0516:05, 17 September 2024 diff hist +204 Cass Review It would be UNDUE to name the BMA's criticism in the lede, without adding equal credence to the majority of accredited medical organisations in the UK who have welcomed the recommendations. The alternative would be to name none.
10:5310:53, 17 September 2024 diff hist +90 Cass Review Add references to lede.
10:5210:52, 17 September 2024 diff hist +60 Cass Review →Response from health bodies in the United Kingdom: Referencing
10:4910:49, 17 September 2024 diff hist 0 Cass Review sp
10:4810:48, 17 September 2024 diff hist 0 Cass Review →Response from health bodies in the United Kingdom: Rearrange chronologically
10:4710:47, 17 September 2024 diff hist +51 Cass Review The current lede is misleading - every British medical organisation discussed in the article (with the current exception of the BMA) has welcomed the report.

4 December 2024

3 December 2024

1 December 2024

22 November 2024

20 November 2024

18 November 2024

28 October 2024

25 October 2024

23 October 2024

7 October 2024

3 October 2024

1 October 2024

28 September 2024

27 September 2024

23 September 2024

21 September 2024

19 September 2024

18 September 2024

17 September 2024