Jump to content

User contributions for Backin72

Results for Backin72 talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log

A user with 5,347 edits. Account created on 13 April 2005.

10:3410:34, 23 January 2009 diff hist +7 m User talk:Backin72 ce
10:3310:33, 23 January 2009 diff hist +147 User talk:Backin72 add link to essay
10:2610:26, 23 January 2009 diff hist −16,609 User talk:Backin72 partially archived; keeping relevant stuff "for posterity"
10:2410:24, 23 January 2009 diff hist −121 User talk:Backin72/Archive 1 rm template again
08:2908:29, 23 January 2009 diff hist −120 User talk:Backin72 rm template for now
08:1708:17, 23 January 2009 diff hist +121 User talk:Backin72/Archive 1 request deletion here too
08:1608:16, 23 January 2009 diff hist +120 User talk:Backin72 deletion request per WP:VANISH
08:1008:10, 23 January 2009 diff hist +26,024 N User talk:Backin72/Archive 1 archive

07:3907:39, 14 January 2009 diff hist +250 User talk:Backin72 →OK, I give up: r
07:0007:00, 14 January 2009 diff hist −35 User talk:Backin72 →OK, I give up: yep
07:0007:00, 14 January 2009 diff hist +223 User talk:Backin72 guess that's about it
06:5006:50, 14 January 2009 diff hist +351 Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →Editorial discretion is NOT standard Wikipedia policy: right-o then!
06:3406:34, 14 January 2009 diff hist +1 m Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →Demarcation: fmt
06:3306:33, 14 January 2009 diff hist +501 Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →Editorial discretion is NOT Wikipedia policy: r
06:2706:27, 14 January 2009 diff hist +539 Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →Demarcation: reply, query
05:5805:58, 14 January 2009 diff hist +2 m Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →Demarcation: typos (Levine, I know you won't mind fixing my typo within your quote)
05:5705:57, 14 January 2009 diff hist +309 Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →Demarcation: reply
05:2105:21, 14 January 2009 diff hist +88 Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →Demarcation: signing
05:2005:20, 14 January 2009 diff hist +1,256 Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →Demarcation: replies
05:1005:10, 14 January 2009 diff hist +1,055 Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →Demarcation: reply
05:0005:00, 14 January 2009 diff hist +1 m Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →Proposals for a new article name: rewd
04:5904:59, 14 January 2009 diff hist +1,153 Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →Proposals for a new article name: replies
04:5104:51, 14 January 2009 diff hist +262 Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →Proposals for a new article name: reply
04:4104:41, 14 January 2009 diff hist +951 Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →Problems, dispute resolution ideas: comments, typo fixes
04:2504:25, 14 January 2009 diff hist +564 List of topics characterized as pseudoscience rv per further discussion at talk; please see Talk:List_of_pseudosciences_and_pseudoscientific_concepts#Demarcation. Edit too bold since it went against RfC and was unsupported by local consensus
04:1304:13, 14 January 2009 diff hist +1,261 Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →Demarcation: reply
01:0501:05, 14 January 2009 diff hist +1 m Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →Better version: fmt
01:0401:04, 14 January 2009 diff hist +1,324 Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →Proposals for a new article name: ok to ask questions
00:4900:49, 14 January 2009 diff hist +245 Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →Proposals for a new article name: r - PS is pejorative
00:4500:45, 14 January 2009 diff hist +592 Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →Proposals for a new article name: for SA: sources are objectively very weak, e.g. don't meet MEDRS
00:3700:37, 14 January 2009 diff hist +2,363 Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →Fixing lead: lead is good -- title needs to catch up
00:2500:25, 14 January 2009 diff hist +413 List of topics characterized as pseudoscience rv (mostly) overly bold edit by ScienceApologist on 19:51, 10 January 2009. RfC = no consensus. See Talk:List_of_pseudosciences_and_pseudoscientific_concepts#Better_version
00:2300:23, 14 January 2009 diff hist +1,266 Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →Better version: rationale for revert: RfC generated no consensus to conflate two different levels of sources

23:0023:00, 13 January 2009 diff hist +433 Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →completeness: add to comments
22:5622:56, 13 January 2009 diff hist −3 Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →completeness: oops fix wl
22:5622:56, 13 January 2009 diff hist +276 Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →completeness: readers R smart 'nuff
22:5222:52, 13 January 2009 diff hist +75 Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →RfC: Is it okay for Wikipedia to make a distinction between scientific societies and skeptical societies as different "tiers" of sources?: revise, add WP:COMMON
22:2922:29, 13 January 2009 diff hist +725 Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →RfC: Is it okay for Wikipedia to make a distinction between scientific societies and skeptical societies as different "tiers" of sources?: whither reply? + no consensus
22:2122:21, 13 January 2009 diff hist −253 Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →Problems, dispute resolution ideas: re-reply
22:1722:17, 13 January 2009 diff hist +1 m Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →Proposals for a new article name: indent again
22:1622:16, 13 January 2009 diff hist +3 Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →Proposals for a new article name: fmt
22:1422:14, 13 January 2009 diff hist +686 Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →Proposals for a new article name: reply - undue weight to rely on lesser sources to categorize
22:1222:12, 13 January 2009 diff hist +232 Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →Proposals for a new article name: how do you know?
20:5420:54, 13 January 2009 diff hist +610 User talk:Mccready ns: Request
20:5020:50, 13 January 2009 diff hist +369 Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop →Template: propose WP:FLAGREV
20:4320:43, 13 January 2009 diff hist +922 User talk:Backin72 semi, mini-essay on the problem
20:3320:33, 13 January 2009 diff hist +209 User talk:Backin72 →OK, I give up: doh
20:3220:32, 13 January 2009 diff hist −173 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Supervised Editing: rm gratuitous comment -- I really don't know enough about this to vent about it. Apologies.
20:3120:31, 13 January 2009 diff hist 0 m Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →Proposals for a new article name: sp
20:2020:20, 13 January 2009 diff hist +1,992 Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience →Proposals for a new article name: several replies, rm off-topic comments

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Backin72"