Tennessee articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total | |
FA | 3 | 10 | 9 | 22 | |||
FL | 1 | 12 | 13 | ||||
A | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
GA | 2 | 4 | 25 | 82 | 4 | 117 | |
B | 8 | 40 | 79 | 250 | 20 | 397 | |
C | 11 | 30 | 197 | 922 | 109 | 1,269 | |
Start | 39 | 442 | 3,700 | 496 | 4,677 | ||
Stub | 7 | 121 | 3,914 | 2 | 751 | 4,795 | |
List | 8 | 33 | 146 | 3 | 78 | 268 | |
Category | 1 | 4,863 | 4,864 | ||||
Disambig | 3 | 40 | 43 | ||||
File | 201 | 201 | |||||
Portal | 1 | 1 | |||||
Project | 17 | 17 | |||||
Template | 619 | 619 | |||||
NA | 6 | 161 | 475 | 642 | |||
Other | 46 | 46 | |||||
Assessed | 21 | 134 | 914 | 9,201 | 6,267 | 1,458 | 17,995 |
Unassessed | 15 | 84 | 99 | ||||
Total | 21 | 134 | 914 | 9,216 | 6,267 | 1,542 | 18,094 |
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 58,648 | Ω = 5.20 |
Welcome to the assessment department of WikiProject Tennessee! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Tennessee related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Tennessee}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Tennessee articles by quality and Category:Tennessee articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.
Frequently asked questions
edit- How can I get my article rated?
- Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
- Who can assess articles?
- Any member of WikiProject Tennessee is free to add or change the rating of an article.
- Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
- Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
- What if I don't agree with a rating?
- You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
- Aren't the ratings subjective?
- Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.
Instructions
editQuality assessment
editAn article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Banner Shell}}. Articles that have the {{WikiProject Tennessee}} project banner on their talk page will be added to the appropriate categories by quality.
The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):
FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Tennessee articles) | FA | |
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Tennessee articles) | A | |
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Tennessee articles) | GA | |
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Tennessee articles) | B | |
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Tennessee articles) | C | |
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Tennessee articles) | Start | |
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Tennessee articles) | Stub | |
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Tennessee articles) | FL | |
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Tennessee articles) | List |
For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:
Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Tennessee articles) | Category | |
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Tennessee articles) | Disambig | |
Draft (for drafts; adds pages to Category:Draft-Class Tennessee articles) | Draft | |
File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class Tennessee articles) | File | |
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Tennessee articles) | Portal | |
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Tennessee articles) | Project | |
Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Tennessee articles) | Template | |
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Tennessee articles) | NA | |
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Tennessee articles) | ??? |
After assessing an article's quality, comments on the assessment can be added to the article's talk page.
Quality scale
editClass | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
FA | The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Cleopatra (as of June 2018) |
FL | The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
A | The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
GA | The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019) |
B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Psychology (as of January 2024) |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Wing (as of June 2018) |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Ball (as of September 2014) |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014) |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of literary movements |
Priority assessment
editAn article's priority assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Tennessee}} project banner on its talk page:
{{WikiProject Tennessee| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
The following values may be used for priority assessments: | |
• Top - adds articles to Category:Top-importance Tennessee articles | Top |
• High - adds articles to Category:High-importance Tennessee articles | High |
• Mid - adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Tennessee articles | Mid |
• Low - adds articles to Category:Low-importance Tennessee articles | Low |
• Leave this field blank to add to Category:Unassigned-importance Tennessee articles | ??? |
Priority scale
editLabel | Criteria | Examples |
---|---|---|
Top | Core topics about Tennessee. Generally, these topics are sub-articles of the main Tennessee article, vital for the understanding of Tennessee or extremely notable to people outside of Tennessee. This category should stay limited to approximately 100 members. Biographies should be limited to the top one or two Tennesseans in a particular field or persons of the greatest historical importance.
In a nutshell: Practical tip: |
History of Tennessee Nashville, Tennessee |
High | Topics that are very notable within Tennessee, and well-known outside of it, and can be reasonably expected to be included in any print encyclopedia.
In a nutshell: Practical tip: |
Great Smoky Mountains Knoxville, Tennessee |
Mid | Topics that are reasonably notable on a local level within Tennessee without necessarily being famous or very notable outside of Tennessee. Could only be included in a multi-volume encyclopedia.
In a nutshell: Practical tip: |
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Murfreesboro, Tennessee |
Low | Topics of mostly local interest or those that are only included for complete coverage or as examples of a higher-level topic; peripheral or trivial topics or topics that have only a limited connection to Tennessee.
In a nutshell: Practical tip: |
Cumberland Gap Tunnel Gresham Middle School |
Articles needing attention
editIf an article is in need of immediate attention (proper sourcing, significant cleanup, etc.), please denote this using the template as follows:
{{WikiProject Tennessee|...|attention=yes|...}}
This will add the article to Category:Tennessee articles needing attention. Also, add your concerns to the article's talk page, so an editor wishing to address the problem(s) can focus their efforts.
Please review this category from time to time to see if you can help with an article needing attention. Once the major problems have been addressed, please remove the attention notation from the template on the talk page.
Merge action needed
editWhen you propose a merge involving a WikiProject Tennessee article, please denote this using the template as follows:
{{WikiProject Tennessee|...|merge=yes|...}}
This will add the article to Category:Tennessee articles needing merge action.
Please review this category from time to time to see if you can help reach a consensus on the proposed merge. Once a consensus is reached (and the merge is performed, if appropriate), please remove the merge notation from the template on the talk page.
Article review & dispute resolution
edit
|
Older and resolved reviews can be found in the article review archive on the right.
Request an assessment
editIf you have
- started a Tennessee related article article and would like an outside opinion on it
- made significant changes to a rated Tennessee related article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it
- found a Tennessee related articles that has not been reviewed yet
please feel free to list it below for an assessment.
Perry County, Tennessee Just did a pretty big overhaul and expansion of the page. Still some work to be done but any thoughts on where to go from here would be helpful. Thanks! --nf utvol (talk) 01:34, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Richland Creek (Nashville, Tennessee) I have added to this stub article to expand it considerably. In its original form, the article incorrectly had the creek flowing in the opposite direction. Thanks, Eagledj (talk) 00:58, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- Great use of sources and illustrations! I'll update the rating to Good Article. ElToAn123 (talk) 16:35, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Baylor School added 01/02/2012 Done 13:20, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Hot chicken This article was started by me, details the particular "Hot chicken" style of fried-chicken that is rather unique to Nashville. Joelmoses 2000 (talk) 01:05, 21 October 2009 (UTC) 22:11, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Army of the Tennessee This article has previously been rated B, but has now been extensively revised and a new assessment would seem to be in order. Thank you. Hartfelt (talk) 15:02, 16 May 2009 (UTC) Previously assessed as A. 22:11, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Brandan Wright Worked on article and just added under project banner. Hoping for possible B-class rating. Thanx! WikiGuy86 (talk) 23:24, 19 August 2009 (UTC) Previously assessed as C. SBaker43 (talk) 22:11, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
James Edwards (radio host) This article is currently unassessed. Stonemason89 (talk) 15:55, 1 May 2010 (UTC) Article has been previously redirected to: The Political Cesspool.22:11, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Merlin Miller This article is currently unassessed. Stonemason89 (talk) 15:55, 1 May 2010 (UTC) Previously assessed.22:11, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Corrections Corporation of America This article is currently unassessed. Previously assessed. 22:11, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Millington, Tennessee This article has previously been rated a stub class article, but has now been extensively revised. I am requesting a new assessment. Thank-you. November 19, 2010 20:23, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Atoka, Tennessee This article is not complete, but could it be raised from a stub and from low importance? Suggestions welcome. User talk:SLBohrman I'm sorry, I signed this comment incorrectly. SLBohrman (talk) 22:16, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Cumberland Caverns. I have revised overhauled this article significantly by adding a picture and breaking the text into three sections, two of which I wrote myself and one of which I edited to raise the writing quality. Denlah (talk) 04:25, 8 January 2014 (UTC) Upgraded to C RageBanken (talk) 12:29, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Milan, Tennessee. This article is not complete, but has been drastically overhauled since its last review. Whomever reviews this article, please shoot me some feedback. I'll re-submit for review again in about a year with more fixes. I am under no dilusion that a city of this size will ever meet "FA" status, but I'm going to make it the best I can. Thanks for the time and consideration, don't forget to peek at the talk page (even if no one else talks, I document reasoning and thoughts there.) RageBanken (talk) 07:12, 11 April 2014 (UTC) Done 13:23, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Tims Ford State Park. I just finished creating this article. I'm aware that it probably qualifies as a stub, but I'm still interested in hearing feedback before I get to clearing the rest of the red links in the Tennessee Protected Areas category. Thanks! Chris (talk) 02:31, 6 October 2015 (UTC) Done 13:23, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Memphis Area Transit Authority I have updated information on this article, such as ridership. I have also reorganized the article to flow more similarly to other transit agency articles. I have also added information about Ready! and Groove. The corresponding list article had some unnecessary information, so I have moved that information to the main article. I believe these improvements warrant a change from stub-class to start-class. ElToAn123 (talk) 00:05, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- I've also added substantially to the history section using citations from The Commercial Appeal archives. I'd even argue that the article is C-Class now. The gap in the history section from 1963 to 2017 and lack of detail in the bus section keep it from being B-Class. ElToAn123 (talk) 21:48, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Dispute an assessment
editIf your Tennessee related article has been rated and you do not agree with the rating, please keep in mind that assessments might not always be objective. Compare the article in question to the assessment standards for quality and importance as outlined above in this page. If you think the article in question meets higher standards than assessed, please feel free to list it below for a review.
The Southern College of Optometry article is no longer a stub, somewhere between a Start or a C. Hjk321 (talk) 17:39, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Project review
editIf you are a member of the WikiProject Tennessee and want to suggest a Tennessee related article for review by other project members, please feel free to list it below.
Articles for deletion
editIf you have found a Tennessee related article that you think needs to be deleted, please feel free to list it below for a review.
Assessment Log
edit- The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.
November 24, 2024
editReassessed
edit- Burleigh Hines (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Cornelia Clark (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Joe Chambers (musician) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from NA-Class to Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Raymond C. Ortlund Jr. (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Spencer Hays (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
edit- Category:Tennessee independents (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Yelawolf (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
edit- Category:Tennessee Independents (talk) removed.
November 23, 2024
editReassessed
edit- 10th GMA Dove Awards (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- 14th GMA Dove Awards (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- 1st GMA Dove Awards (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
edit- Diane Coleman (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Penstemon brevisepalus (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- What We Do in Secret (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
November 22, 2024
editReassessed
edit- Bat Creek Stone (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Bellevue Baptist Church (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- International Paper (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Tennessee's 1st congressional district (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Tornado outbreak of March 24–27, 2023 (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Upper Cumberland Presbyterian Church (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from NA-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
edit- Category:East Tennessee State Buccaneers football navigational boxes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:East Tennessee State Buccaneers men's basketball navigational boxes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:East Tennessee State Buccaneers navigational boxes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Fisk Bulldogs athletes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Fisk Bulldogs men's track and field athletes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Fisk Bulldogs track and field (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders football navigational boxes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders men's basketball navigational boxes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders navigational boxes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Ohio Valley Conference baseball navigational boxes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Ohio Valley Conference basketball navigational boxes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Ohio Valley Conference football navigational boxes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Ohio Valley Conference navigational boxes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Smith & Wesson (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Draft:Taylon Hope (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Tennessee Docs football navigational boxes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Tennessee State Tigers basketball navigational boxes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Tennessee State Tigers football navigational boxes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Tennessee Tech Golden Eagles football navigational boxes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Tennessee Tech Golden Eagles men's basketball navigational boxes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Tennessee Tech Golden Eagles navigational boxes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Tennessee Titans draft navigational boxes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Tennessee Titans templates (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Tennessee Volunteers baseball navigational boxes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Tennessee Volunteers softball navigational boxes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Tennessee education navigational boxes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Tennessee universities and colleges leaders navigational boxes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Tennessee universities and colleges navigational boxes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:University of Tennessee templates (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
November 21, 2024
editReassessed
edit- 2007–08 Tennessee Volunteers basketball team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Caroline Meriwether Goodlett (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- French Broad River (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- LeMoyne–Owen College (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- National Baptist Convention, USA, Inc. (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Tennessee State Route 9 (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- William Fitzgerald (Tennessee politician) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
edit- Category:Maryville Scots athletes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Maryville Scots men's track and field athletes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Maryville Scots track and field (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
November 20, 2024
editRenamed
edit- Robert Hassell (baseball) renamed to Robert Hassell III.
Reassessed
edit- 1994 United States House of Representatives elections in Tennessee (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to List-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Belmont Bruins men's basketball (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Tennessee State Route 36 (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Tennessee State Route 48 (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- The Earls of Leicester (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- U.S. Route 70N (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
edit- Robert Hassell III (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Swimming venues in Tennessee (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
November 19, 2024
editReassessed
edit- East Tennessee State University James H. Quillen College of Medicine (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Hurricane Helene (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Majority-minority counties in Tennessee (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t)
- WSKZ (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
edit- List of mayors of Columbia, Tennessee (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- List of mayors of Cookeville, Tennessee (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- List of mayors of Franklin, Tennessee (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- List of mayors of Lebanon, Tennessee (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
November 18, 2024
editReassessed
edit- 2018 Southern Appalachian earthquake (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Adrienne Young (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Memphis Area Transit Authority (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
edit- A. W. O. Totten (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Reggie B. Fine (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- William Scott Day (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)