Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Synchromysticism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:39, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Synchromysticism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Neologism, notability, no meaningful content, list of links, etc etc etc. Author contested; changed to afd  superβεεcat  02:47, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am taking appropriate steps to address your concerns. megadoom.

• Delete - per nom. Jd027^chat 14:02, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Notability is dubious at best and article is unencyclopedic and largely devoid of content. --Kajerm (talk) 19:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Looks like a mixture of original research and nonsense. – jaksmata 21:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 23:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Sources appear to be unreliable, editorial comments on them notwithstanding. --Shirahadasha (talk) 02:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.