Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Edwards (footballer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 20:51, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Edwards (footballer)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nomination - a contested PROD arising out of an unseemly edit war. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:48, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:57, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:57, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:57, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:57, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: does not meet WP:NFOOTY as Edwards has never made an appearance. The repeated disruptive editing also seemed to have no logic, I didn't know how to stop it. User:Hjk1106 22:52, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - clearly fails WP:NFOOTY, in terms of WP:GNG, she has more chance passing on her boxing coverage but even that isn't enough for me Spiderone 10:18, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Boxing-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:18, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 10:23, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and NFOOTY failure. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 11:28, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just to note that my nom was procedural and I wasn't necessarily arguing for deletion. I just had this minor spat bubbling away on my watchlist and rather than having a prod being added and removed ad infinitum I thought it better dealt with here. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 11:49, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 11:38, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above.--Ortizesp (talk) 13:53, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails notability guidelines Jack1956 (talk) 09:12, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.