Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elise Finch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Vanamonde93 (talk) 01:55, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Elise Finch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was deleted via PROD in 2015 as she failed to meet notability guidelines for local news anchors and people in general and did not gain any afterwards. Most of the article's references are about her untimely death, which does not add notability per WP:NOTMEMORIAL The Legendary Ranger (talk) 23:13, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 December 27. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:27, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and New York. Shellwood (talk) 23:30, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The obituaries absolutely count towards notability. Her death was covered in by-lined articles in Variety, People, Hollywood Reporter, and the Los Angeles Times. Non-notable people don't merit obituaries like these. Before her death, she also received sigcov in, e.g., The Daily News. pburka (talk) 23:40, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, Television, Arizona, Minnesota, and Ohio. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:23, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep a local meteorologist in New York, getting coverage in Los Angeles after her death shows notability. Plenty of coverage. Oaktree b (talk) 01:43, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep significant coverage. Tgvarrt (talk) 23:38, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.