Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniela Di Bartolo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 07:48, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Daniela Di Bartolo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Footballer who played only 10 games in a league which fails WP:FOOTYN in that it's not listed here, and also per precedence in this discussion, this discussion, this discussion and this discussion. Geschichte (talk) 06:23, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:28, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:28, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:28, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:28, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:33, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 19:32, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet our ludicously overbroad inclusion criteria for footballers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:20, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - has one in-depth reference that could be used to expand the article in Adelaide Now but I couldn't find anything else Spiderone 10:09, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.