PEPSI697
| This is PEPSI697's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
 | PLEASE NOTE BEFORE LEAVING A NEW TOPIC OR REPLY ON MY TALK PAGE: This user has ASD, so this user can be very sensitive to certain things, this means no swearing, commenting on me, abuse or a impolite way another user talks out to this user, all of those don't(s) are NOT tolerated here, if it happens, they will not be archived and will be removed from here by me. I would request users to be civil on this talk page. Also, in this user talk page Please also keep this talk page for Wikipedia related content only. Warnings or if you want to let me know something, that is totally accepted here. Thank you for noticing! |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
We must have edit conflicted on our undo of that edit to Glock (Twinkle does not warn me when I undo something that has already been undone) but my warning got to the IP first. So, we both warned them for the same edit at User talk:2600:8801:1300:8B40:D69F:9B33:819E:E470. --- Meters (talk) 09:39, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- I've removed my level 1 warning. Up to you if you want to downgrade your level 2 warning to a level 1. I don't think a level 2 is out of place; I thought about leaving a level 2 right off the bat. Meters (talk) 09:55, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- So I've must've coincidentally reverted the same edit as you at the same time. No worries, it's all good. I didn't even realise that you've left a new message the same time. Thanks. PEPSI697 (💬 • 📝) 10:54, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Regarding block notices
editRegarding your edit summary and revert here, editors are indeed allowed to remove warnings and block messages from their talk page. See WP:BLANKING.-- Ponyobons mots 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ah ok, I probably got mixed up because I knew that you couldn't remove declined block request notices. Thanks for letting me know. PEPSI697 (💬 • 📝) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
User talk:Jan Otuwi
editUser talk:Jan Otuwi can remove block notices. The only block information that can't be removed is declined unblock requests. WP:KEEPDECLINEDUNBLOCK — rsjaffe 🗣️ 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ah ok, I probably got mixed up because I knew that you couldn't remove declined block request notices. Thanks for letting me know. PEPSI697 (💬 • 📝) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
edit
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Thanks!
editHi! Many thanks for being diligent about leaving warnings on user talk pages after you've had to revert their edits. It's much easier to judge if someone needs to be blocked when every problematic edit got a warning. I appreciate the extra trouble you go to during Recent Change patrol. Joyous! Noise! 03:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Thanks very much! I appreciate it. PEPSI697 (💬 • 📝) 03:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted
edit
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks very much! Have a nice day. PEPSI697 (💬 • 📝) 20:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Rollback granted
edit
Hi PEPSI697. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account . Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
- Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism . Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
- Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:14, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Shashka
editPlease refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shashka. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. PEPSI697 (💬 • 📝) 08:50, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
U even did not read the article! Shashka is a back sword of Ethnic groups in the Caucasus, just adopted by Cossaks, so it is should be called of as backsword of peoples Caucasus 82.200.143.211 (talk) 06:27, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Having another look at the revision. Unfortunately, I stand by my decision and the edit appears to be non constructive to me. Sorry about that! Unfortunately, I won't restore the edit for you because it doesn't look appropriate for a short description. Thanks. PEPSI697 (💬 • 📝) 07:29, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- as U have better English than me, may U add explanation to the Short description? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.200.143.211 (talk) 10:32, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- I would recommend you to see Wikipedia policy Wikipedia:Short description as it has more information. Thanks. PEPSI697 (💬 • 📝) 10:39, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- as U have better English than me, may U add explanation to the Short description? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.200.143.211 (talk) 10:32, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Phyllis O’Donell
editMatt Warshaw’s Encyclopedia of Surfing spells Phyllis’ surname correctly… but most do not. It must have given her the shits. 119.12.217.10 (talk) 06:34, 30 November 2024 (UTC)