Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I am the one who nominated the Draft of a name I have forgot for deletion (you can find a contribution about it in my contributions page). What was the name of it, because the page creation has been wiped from the contributions of the IP (71.17.196.25 i believe?). 71.78.136.213 (talk) 19:37, 1 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Extended content
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Updates for editors
Editors who use the "Special characters" editing-toolbar menu can now see the 32 special characters you have used most recently, across editing sessions on that wiki. This change should help make it easier to find the characters you use most often. The feature is in both the 2010 wikitext editor and VisualEditor. [1]
Editors using the 2010 wikitext editor can now create sublists with correct indentation by selecting the line(s) you want to indent and then clicking the toolbar buttons.[2] You can now also insert <code> tags using a new toolbar button.[3] Thanks to user stjn for these improvements.
Help is needed to ensure the citation generator works properly on each wiki.
(1) Administrators should update the local versions of the page MediaWiki:Citoid-template-type-map.json to include entries for preprint, standard, and dataset; Here are example diffs to replicate for 'preprint' and for 'standard' and 'dataset'.
(2.1) If the citoid map in the citation template used for these types of references is missing, one will need to be added. (2.2) If the citoid map does exist, the TemplateData will need to be updated to include new field names. Here are example updates for 'preprint' and for 'standard' and 'dataset'. The new fields that may need to be supported are archiveID, identifier, repository, organization, repositoryLocation, committee, and versionNumber. [4]
Administrators can now nuke pages created by a user or IP address from the last 90 days, up from the initial 30 days. T380846
A 'Recreated' tag will now be added to pages that were created with the same title as a page which was previously deleted and it can be used as a filter in Special:RecentChanges and Special:NewPages. T56145
Latest comment: 26 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello there. I wanted to talk about the Sinfest situation in more detail. As you said before that brief RfC closed: "find high-quality sources and summarise what they say." While that's certainly true, polite and said in good faith, I think the complainers already understood that would be the best option, they just didn't think it would be possible. I'm inclined to agree with them.
I don't know how familiar you are with writing about webcomics, so I hope you don't mind if I gab the scenic route. It's a real bother. While there are plenty of readers, with one hosting platform pulling in tens of millions of readers alone, webcomics are very poorly positioned to produce the kind of sources we can use. They're overwhelmingly hobbyist, "a person, a tablet, and a dream" affairs. That doesn't draw in reporters for a webcomic beat, the way there's a book beat or a comics beat. A webcomic's very successful if it can support its artist, so they don't get the kind of dollars or commercialization that get attention. There hasn't been the time or cash flow for respectable, well-established publishers. There's little academic interest. In short, waiting for a cite from something like the New York Times is a bad idea. Sourcing webcomics is more of a scrounging act. "We found statements from two noted cartoonists and a newspaper article going "Local artist does something on Internet, computers confuse us but good on them I guess.""
This might be easier if we had a body of editors experienced in where to look and how, and their notes - you know, institutional knowledge - but the webcomic wikiproject was killed after - and bitterness may be coloring my memories here - a small number of editors devastated our coverage of the topic, using AfD as a first resort, making no effort to improve articles or look for sources, re-nominating and re-re-nominating the same articles for deletion as many times as it took to get a "delete", and even if you made the grueling scavenger hunt to find sources for an article that would probably be deleted regardless, you wouldn't have the time or energy to do the same for the other nineteen they AfD'd blithely at the same time. You can understand why that'd be bad for morale.
You especially won't find articles going "Webcomic respected long time ago spouts Nazi stances." Why would people write those? There's rather a lot of very disagreeable things on the Internet. Keeping track of it wouldn't be possible or sane, and charting its history is perhaps of interest to students of radicalization and history professors, who are thin on the ground with webcomics. But since notability's not temporary, we can end up in a situation where all we have are good, reasonable, old sources about what a webcomic was that are wholly inaccurate about what a webcomic is.
Which brings us to the business at hand.
Sinfest was wacky, irreverent gag-a-day comedy. Then it was earnest feminism. In the last couple of months it's depicted Jews poisoning wells, sacrificing babies and draining their blood, and a Jew being killed in an on-panel lynching as a righteous act. A quote:
"What's the password? "Kill all the goyim. Smash their idols. Burn their statues. Annihilate them from memory." "Shalom."
I don't mean to say the Sinfest of today is that bad. I mean to say it's much worse. I've left out the things someone might contest, such as the council of the "Learned Elders of Zion" being a reference to The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, Yahweh being drawn as The Happy Merchant, and his "We are eternal" line being another reference, and the things from further back such as how the camps and Hitler being evil were propaganda and the real victim was Germany and the real perpetrator the Jews, or the perfidy of the Jewish financiers and media in the Weimar Republic.
To my feeble understanding, the complainers' argument is that having an encyclopedia article that presents what Sinfest has become as what it once was is inaccurate - worse, it's deceptive. People who oppose covering what it is without secondary sources argue that it's accepted that Wikipedia is a work in progress, but what are we supposed to do, wait thirty years until the 200-hour adaptation of Homestuck takes the world by storm and the field gets enough interest for someone to compile The History of Webcomics, 1985-2007?
I'm sympathetic to the complainers on this, and would invoke IAR if I thought it had a snowball's chance. Do you have any angles on tackling this mess? For instance, would you happen to know if it'd be appropriate to use that "What's the password?" panel as the illustration for the article? --Kizor19:38, 7 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 25 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Thanks for your rangeblock and mass deletion of the "Shruthi swarup" edits - we'll see what happens in 72 hours (if not sooner) - thanks again - Arjayay (talk) 12:05, 8 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 22 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Extended content
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Weekly highlight
The Product and Technology Advisory Council (PTAC) has published a draft of their recommendations for the Wikimedia Foundation's Product and Technology department. They have recommended focusing on mobile experiences, particularly contributions. They request community feedback at the talk page by 21 February.
Updates for editors
The "Special pages" portlet link will be moved from the "Toolbox" into the "Navigation" section of the main menu's sidebar by default. This change is because the Toolbox is intended for tools relating to the current page, not tools relating to the site, so the link will be more logically and consistently located. To modify this behavior and update CSS styling, administrators can follow the instructions at T385346. [7]
As part of this year's work around improving the ways readers discover content on the wikis, the Web team will be running an experiment with a small number of readers that displays some suggestions for related or interesting articles within the search bar. Please check out the project page for more information.
View all 22 community-submitted tasks that were resolved last week. For example, the global blocks log will now be shown directly on the Special:CentralAuth page, similarly to global locks, to simplify the workflows for stewards. [9]
Updates for technical contributors
Wikidata now supports a special language as a "default for all languages" for labels and aliases. This is to avoid excessive duplication of the same information across many languages. If your Wikidata queries use labels, you may need to update them as some existing labels are getting removed. [10]
The function getDescription was invoked on every Wiki page read and accounts for ~2.5% of a page's total load time. The calculated value will now be cached, reducing load on Wikimedia servers. [11]
As part of the RESTBase deprecation effort, the /page/related endpoint has been blocked as of February 6, 2025, and will be removed soon. This timeline was chosen to align with the deprecation schedules for older Android and iOS versions. The stable alternative is the "morelike" action API in MediaWiki, and a migration example is available. The MediaWiki Interfaces team can be contacted for any questions. [12]
In depth
The latest quarterly Language and Internationalization newsletter is available. It includes: Updates about the "Contribute" menu; details on some of the newest language editions of Wikipedia; details on new languages supported by the MediaWiki interface; updates on the Community-defined lists feature; and more.
The latest Chart Project newsletter is available. It includes updates on the progress towards bringing better visibility into global charts usage and support for categorizing pages in the Data namespace on Commons.
Latest comment: 17 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi, thanks for blocking the IPs, but this person is using new IPs as you perform a block. Please range-block 211.36.142. See 211.36.142.34 filter logs. Jerium (talk) 16:36, 16 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Extended content
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Weekly highlight
Communities using growth tools can now showcase one event on the Special:Homepage for newcomers. This feature will help newcomers to be informed about editing activities they can participate in. Administrators can create a new event to showcase at Special:CommunityConfiguration. To learn more about this feature, please read the Diff post, have a look at the documentation, or contact the Growth team.
Updates for editors
Highlighted talk pages improvements
Starting next week, talk pages at these wikis – Spanish Wikipedia, French Wikipedia, Italian Wikipedia, Japanese Wikipedia – will get a new design. This change was extensively tested as a Beta feature and is the last step of talk pages improvements. [13]
You can now navigate to view a redirect page directly from its action pages, such as the history page. Previously, you were forced to first go to the redirect target. This change should help editors who work with redirects a lot. Thanks to user stjn for this improvement. [14]
When a Cite reference is reused many times, wikis currently show either numbers like "1.23" or localized alphabetic markers like "a b c" in the reference list. Previously, if there were so many reuses that the alphabetic markers were all used, an error message was displayed. As part of the work to modernize Cite customization, these errors will no longer be shown and instead the backlinks will fall back to showing numeric markers like "1.23" once the alphabetic markers are all used.
The log entries for each change to an editor's user-groups are now clearer by specifying exactly what has changed, instead of the plain before and after listings. Translators can help to update the localized versions. Thanks to user Msz2001 for these improvements.
A new filter has been added to the Special:Nuke tool, which allows administrators to mass delete pages, to enable users to filter for pages in a range of page sizes (in bytes). This allows, for example, deleting pages only of a certain size or below. [15]
Non-administrators can now check which pages are able to be deleted using the Special:Nuke tool. Thanks to user MolecularPilot for this and the previous improvements. [16]
View all 25 community-submitted tasks that were resolved last week. For example, a bug was fixed in the configuration for the AV1 video file format, which enables these files to play again. [17]
Updates for technical contributors
Parsoid Read Views is going to be rolling out to most Wiktionaries over the next few weeks, following the successful transition of Wikivoyage to Parsoid Read Views last year. For more information, see the Parsoid/Parser Unification project page. [18][19]
Developers of tools that run on-wiki should note that mw.Uri is deprecated. Tools requiring mw.Uri must explicitly declare mediawiki.Uri as a ResourceLoader dependency, and should migrate to the browser native URL API soon. [20]
Latest comment: 8 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Extended content
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Updates for editors
Administrators can now customize how the Babel feature creates categories using Special:CommunityConfiguration/Babel. They can rename language categories, choose whether they should be auto-created, and adjust other settings. [22]
The wikimedia.org portal has been updated – and is receiving some ongoing improvements – to modernize and improve the accessibility of our portal pages. It now has better support for mobile layouts, updated wording and links, and better language support. Additionally, all of the Wikimedia project portals, such as wikibooks.org, now support dark mode when a reader is using that system setting. [23][24][25]
View all 30 community-submitted tasks that were resolved last week. For example, a bug was fixed that prevented clicking on search results in the web-interface for some Firefox for Android phone configurations. [27]
Meetings and events
The next Language Community Meeting is happening soon, February 28th at 14:00 UTC. This week's meeting will cover: highlights and technical updates on keyboard and tools for the Sámi languages, Translatewiki.net contributions from the Bahasa Lampung community in Indonesia, and technical Q&A. If you'd like to join, simply sign up on the wiki page.
Latest comment: 8 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello, I think you might have mistakenly undone one of my edits to this page where I mass rollbacked that IP hopper. It was supposed to be the year 1935. Can you please check this again? Thanks. User3749 (talk) 18:21, 25 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Yes, that was a mistake, I probably misclicked when looking at the IPs contributions. I’ve rollbacked my edit. Thanks for letting me know. — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:26, 25 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The March 2025 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no nominations on the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
A very big Thank you to all the editors who labour away quietly and help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed.
To members who have added suggestions to the ToDo list at Yorkshire Portal.
To the football and rugby editors who have done sterling work in keeping abreast of the top clubs.
To all the WikiProject Yorkshire editors who have been busy on vandal patrol at watchlist.
Great!
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered March 2025 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Given the negative proxy check, should I still raise this one at WP:OPP, or would it be better to collect the specific evading IPs and report at WP:AIN? (Side note that I think I would file at WP:AIN over WP:AIV, since the IP user is not (solely) a vandal or spammer - they make (what I percieve to be) honest requests, but at an outsized rate as well as with disregard to the WP:RA guidelines. Additional aside that I have started a compilation of RA subpages where the block was evaded at the AN listing.) Tule-hog (talk) 21:40, 1 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Tule-hog. Reports to WP:OPP should be accompanied by evidence. If there's no evidence, then it’s not usually worthwhile. As it happens, the ISP looks like a regular telecommunications company with dynamic IP addressing, which is not an unusual situation.
I’ve blocked the IP for a short while as block evasion. There’s only one edit to Wikipedia space from the /16 since the IPv6 /64 was blocked on 25 February so it doesn’t seem problematic at the moment. If things escalate, by all means collate the IPs and present them at AIN (or add them to the existing report at AN, if that hasn’t been archived.). — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:14, 2 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 day ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Extended content
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Updates for editors
All logged-in editors using the mobile view can now edit a full page. The "Edit full page" link is accessible from the "More" menu in the toolbar. This was previously only available to editors using the Advanced mobile contributions setting. [28]
Interface administrators can now help to remove the deprecated Cite CSS code matching "mw-ref" from their local MediaWiki:Common.css. The list of wikis in need of cleanup, and the code to remove, can be found with this global search and in this example, and you can learn more about how to help on the CSS migration project page. The Cite footnote markers ("[1]") are now rendered by Parsoid, and the deprecated CSS is no longer needed. The CSS for backlinks ("mw:referencedBy") should remain in place for now. This cleanup is expected to cause no visible changes for readers. Please help to remove this code before March 20, after which the development team will do it for you.
When editors embed a file (e.g. [[File:MediaWiki.png]]) on a page that is protected with cascading protection, the software will no longer restrict edits to the file description page, only to new file uploads.[29] In contrast, transcluding a file description page (e.g. {{:File:MediaWiki.png}}) will now restrict edits to the page.[30]
When editors revert a file to an earlier version it will now require the same permissions as ordinarily uploading a new version of the file. The software now checks for 'reupload' or 'reupload-own' rights,[31] and respects cascading protection.[32]
When administrators are listing pages for deletion with the Nuke tool, they can now also list associated talk pages and redirects for deletion, alongside pages created by the target, rather than needing to manually delete these pages afterwards. [33]
The previously noted update to Single User Login, which will accommodate browser restrictions on cross-domain cookies by moving login and account creation to a central domain, will now roll out to all users during March and April. The team plans to enable it for all new account creation on Group0 wikis this week. See the SUL3 project page for more details and an updated timeline.
Since last week there has been a bug that shows some interface icons as black squares until the page has fully loaded. It will be fixed this week. [34]
View all 23 community-submitted tasks that were resolved last week. For example, a bug was fixed with loading images in very old versions of the Firefox browser on mobile. [36]
A request for comment is open to discuss whether AI-generated images (meaning those wholly created by generative AI, not human-created images modified with AI tools) should be banned from use in articles.
A new filter has been added to the Special:Nuke tool, which allows administrators to filter for pages in a range of page sizes (in bytes). This allows, for example, deleting pages only of a certain size or below. T378488
Non-administrators can now check which pages are able to be deleted using the Special:Nuke tool. T376378
