User talk:Korg/Archive 1

Hello Korg/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on Talk page. Again, welcome! You 00:07, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)

Thank Y0u! :-)) Korg

Sir, my source was Wikipedia! I took this map: Image:Position_of_Taranaki.png And then I tweaked it. Not only Auckland, but for EVERY city in New Zealand. Silly! WikiDon 18:40, 31 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

I am writing to tell you that I have listed this template for deletion. It is a duplicate of Template:Resources for collaboration, but in a wide format. You and I are the only users who used this template, and it often became out-of-date. Although I created the template, I now believe it's more trouble than it's worth, so I am proposing to the community that it be deleted.

The discussion is located at Templates for Deletion. Your input is welcome.

--–ArmadniGeneral (talk • contribs) 23:05, 15 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Accents aren't normal to English, but that's a haiku (Hence the solidi to deliniate line breaks/carriage returns) which requires a set number of syllables per line. Hence the descender-accent (Gravè) is used in poetic printint to indicate the location of the stressed syllable(s) if they're in non normal location (cf. Spanish ascender-accents (áéíóú). Hence returned (re-turnd) > returnèd (re-turn-ED) to satisfy the metrical requirements. 68.39.174.238 10:38, 26 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

I discovered your username today because an article you edited was on my watchlist. From what I gather, most of your contributions are to the French Wikipedia project. Could you please help me with the article on Eugene Soubeiran? I created it a while ago, but most of the resources I could find on the subject were in French. I am concerned about the accuracy regarding the content of the stub.

There are some external links that I have included with the article. Could you please use these sources to verify the content of the stub? I would greatly appreciate it. Folajimi 16:52, 20 January 2006 (UTC)^(talk)Reply

Hello again. There is a new article on Pierre Fouquier which needs to be checked for accuracy. Could you please verify the content of the stub as well? There is a google cache that was helpful in the creation of the stub. Is Académie des Sciences French for Academy of Medicine? Also please let me know if you have any other suggestions on how to proceed. Thanks! Folajimi^(talk)

Thanks for taking the time to update the article; your efforts are greatly appreciated. Based on your feedback, I will create a new stub for the other academy.

Your question about the subject's birth year is a valid one. In fact, that year was what I initially included. However, I decided to revise that information because most references had 1776 as his birth year.

The same goes for the middle name. I have no idea what the difference is between Eloi and Eloy. Could this be a masculine/feminine spelling matter? That is just a guess on my part. Also, I have seen articles where his middle name is written as Edouard; does that even seem credible to you??? Folajimi^(talk)

Hi,

I wanted to know why did you modify the number of Amelie Mauresmo's titles on her page from 21 to 20, since she has 20 singles titles PLUS one doubles title. It was changed to 21 earlier in the day with the update on her winning the Australian Open, I wondered why you changed that back and didn't want to re-change it again before asking you why you did this. Thanks for your time.Thiste 13:17, 28 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Pas de problême ! C'est ce que je m'étais figuré :) A+ Thiste 13:56, 28 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yup, that one was removed from MOS:DP about a month ago, with little fanfare [1], so now it's just one disambig notice to rule them all. —Michael Z. 2006-02-17 19:15 Z

Hello,

Could you tell me what "Cholmen" means? It has been attributed to a historic French physician, but there are no articles on the subject. It baffles me, to say the least.

If you have any information on the matter (alternate spellings, root name, etc.), please let me know.

Cheers. Folajimi^Talk

P.S. Did you get my email from about a week ago?

A new user just registered on the Icelandic Wikipedia under the name Korg. I'm wondering, are you that user? If so, welcome. Cheers Io 22:24, 9 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I'm doing a survey of Wikipedia editors as part of a class research project. It's quick, anonymous, and the data will be made available to the Wikipedia community later this month. Would you like to take part? More info here. Thanks! Nonplus 00:13, 2 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, a while ago you made an edit on the Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms guideline. I am proposing a revision to the guideline and I'm soliciting your comments. You can find the link to my rewrite at Wikipedia talk:Avoid neologisms -- cmh 00:58, 12 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Must have been too many of us following that spammer. I can't believe I actually put it back in! I hope that's the only case where I messed up! JonHarder 21:43, 17 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

No problem. I've checked his contributions and it seems to be OK. Korg (talk) 21:46, 17 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

I am not—see here. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 14:27, 24 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for protecting my page, Korg. He's doing it on meta, commons, wikiquote, German wikipedia. Hopefully he'll get bored soon. :-) SlimVirgin ^(talk) 20:05, 18 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Is User:205.234.108.114 actually an open proxy? 205.234.108.114 has made 0 edits to (main) but has added their IP address to your User:Korg/OP/Tests page twice, and even requested an unblock for the block that followed after the first addition. Do you have any idea what's going on? --  Netsnipe  ►  12:47, 5 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

The page has been restored. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ 14:44, 10 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. Korg (talk) 14:50, 10 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I have seen that you are using the Cacycle editor extension. This program is no longer actively maintained in favor of its much more powerful successor wikEd.

wikEd has all the functionality of the old editor plus: • syntax highlighting • nifty image buttons • more fixing buttons • paste formatted text from Word or web pages • convert the formatted text into wikicode • adjust the font size • and much, much more.

Switching to wikEd is easy, check the detailed installation description on its project homepage. Often it is as simple as changing every occurrence of editor.js into wikEd.js on your User:YourUsername/monobook.js page.

Cacycle 22:22, 8 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! I'll try it. Korg (talk) 23:12, 8 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

--Deni smailbegovic 02:54, 10 November 2006 (UTC) Please check our arguments in the talk section of that page (relatively important number of visitors from many countries, French version of the article approved). I hope that you'll remove your request, especially because of the fact that this service seems to be useful to many people.Reply

Attention mon vieux, jai le privilege et le doit de faire ce que je veux parce que je suis le Mantis Blanc!Blancamant

Salut Korg!

J'ai fait la traduction de ce message depuis l'anglais (voir en bas) mais je ne suis pas très sur si j'ai traduit correctement. Pourriez-vous vérifiez?

To whom it may concern

I am an amateur photographer who visited the Basillica in January 2006. I asked to take photos with a tripod and was requested to sign a document that 

I believe prohibited me from commercial use of the resulting photos. 

I had and have no intentions of selling the photo, however, I was very pleased with the result of the photo 

and uploaded it to Wikipedia, a free online encyclopedia. 

I uploaded it under a licence that states it is my own personal work but it, or derivatives of it, can be used for any purpose. 

Therefore, it has been pointed out that I may have broken the terms of the document that I signed. 

Could you please confirm exactly what restrictions there are on my photograph and whether you believe it should be removed from Wikipedia?

For the record, the article on the Basillica is here: 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notre-Dame_de_Montr%C3%A9al_Basilica

The photograph in question is here: 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Notre-Dame_de_Montr%C3%A9al_Basilica_Jan_2006.jpg

Wikipedia is commited to ensuring that no laws and will be forced to remove the image if  it is determined that its use is in breach of the document 

I signed. 

That would be a shame, but I understand your need to control commercial photography inside the Basillica.

Regards,

David

Ce qui devrait faire ceci en français:

Cher monsieur ou madame,

Je suis un photographe amateur qui a visité la Basilique en janvier de 2006. J’ai fait la demande de prendre des photos avec un trépied et on m’a 

demandé de signer un document qui – je crois – m’interdisait a utiliser ces photos afin de gagner de l’argent par des mesures commerciaux. Je n’avais 

et je n’ai pas l’intention de vendre la photo, mais, comme j’étais très content avec le résultat, je l’ai importé sur Wikipédia, l’encyclopédie libre 

sur Internet. 

Je l’ai importé avec un licence d’image disant que l’image est mon œuvre, mais que tout autre version(s) modifiée(s) peuvent être utilisés pour quoi 

que ce soit. 

Donc, on m’a informé qu’il est possible que j’aurai agi contre les termes du document que j’ai signé. 

Pourriez-vous confirmez quelles restrictions se trouvent-ils sur mon image, et si vous penser si l’image devrait être enlevé de Wikipédia ?

Pour votre information, l’article sur la Basilique se trouve ici :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notre-Dame_de_Montr%C3%A9al_Basilica (en Anglais)

Et ici, en français : http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basilique_Notre-Dame_de_Montr%C3%A9al 

L’image concernée se trouve ici :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Notre-Dame_de_Montr%C3%A9al_Basilica_Jan_2006.jpg

Wikipédia est très active à être sur que nul image soit contre la loi de quelconque pays et elle [Wikipédia] sera obligée de enlever l’image du site si 

elle [l’image] va contre ce qui disait le document. Ça serait dommage de l’enlever, mais je comprends que vous devez contrôler la photographie 

commerciale dans la basilique.

Je vous remercie de votre compréhension, madame, monsieur, et acceptez mes salutations distinguées,

David

Merci à l'avance, et pourriez-vous répondre sur ma page de discussion de ce Wikipédia? Car j'en ai marre des gens qui laissent leurs réponses sur leurs propres pages!

Merci encore,

Booksworm Talk to me! 10:11, 10 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for reporting all those open proxies a couple weeks ago. There was a long backlog, but they have been blocked. —Centrx→talk • 06:14, 20 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome! Korg (talk) 15:33, 21 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

RE (Badminton): You're welcome!--Aleenf1 05:26, 29 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

You apparently used the image from de:Kanüle; it is OK there because that article, if read carefully, is about hypodermic needles. Here it looks confusing because parts of the article refer to a flexible plastic tubing or do not provide technical details.

Cannula, as far as I understand from its usage and origin, is applicable to both flexible and hard tubings. The article will perhaps mention that like fr:Canule now does (as far as I understand French). So far I suggest that Kanüle.jpg is used near a paragraph that deals with corresponding type of cannulae, or is not used at all. Perhaps you already have ideas how to do that? I, on the contrary, will need to clear up some things before. --saimhe 13:56, 29 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I saw edits to Cameron Esposito and nominated it for a CSD NN based upon notability. I also noticed you had placed a notablility tag on it. Another user removed both those tags. Could you revisit this article and keep it on watch? Ronbo76 04:56, 11 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 17:19, 11 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

You really are doing a great job there. If you'd be willing, I'd like to add your name to this list, so that you can add any further open proxies you find straight into the 'awaiting block' section. Cheers --Michael Billington (talk) 01:18, 15 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Eurovision 2007

Let's be very practical and spread the message widely

vote for west europe to save the contest

VOTES ONLY FOR SPAIN- FRANCE- SWEDEN- FINLAND- IRELAND- UNITED KINGDOM- GERMANY-

I'm not voting for my Favorite Moldova, Ukarine & Georgia

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Littledaniel_93"

Thanks for uploading Image:A-Style logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:16, 14 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I noticed that you were the last one to edit WP:ASM. I am proposing that this article redirect to Wikipedia:WikiProject Assam. Can you please comment in the [[Talk:WP:ASM |talk page of WP:ASM]] if you have any objections?

Deepraj | Talk 13:02, 21 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for responding with comments on the [[Talk:WP:ASM |talk page of WP:ASM]]. -Deepraj | Talk 13:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 23:44, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I just removed a character,[2] but thanks for the note! :) And congratulations for the GA status and for your great work! Korg (talk) 00:05, 2 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the information, now I know the correct process to move an article or anything else.

E&M^(talk) 16:14, 21 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Korg, thank you for fixing my "pate de fois gras" mistake. :-) SlimVirgin ^{(talk)(contribs)} 07:34, 7 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

"(re-added deleted entries that are sufficiently notable to be articles - WP:MOSDAB#Redlinks)": if they are sufficiently notable, please add mention of them to the blue-linked articles on the disambiguation page. The linked article is supposed to give more information to the reader, also per WP:MOSDAB#Redlinks. Cheers! -- JHunterJ 14:31, 16 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I notice that you've edited some French IPA transcriptions and removed the stress mark [']. Since the placement of stress is predictable in French, it is true that such stress marks are, in a strict sense, redundant. However, the average user of the English version of Wikipedia has no conception of French phonology, and is hardly going to consult the French phonology article to learn about the stress rules. The stress marks are helpful to this average user, so I am replacing them.

Thanks for letting me know. I've fixed the blurbs. Raul654 16:00, 22 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on RADIO.BLOG.CLUB, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because RADIO.BLOG.CLUB is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting RADIO.BLOG.CLUB, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 07:03, 28 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi Korg,

Thanks for fixing up the IPA key. I had no idea how to get a TOC without splitting up the table. kwami 01:19, 14 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome! Korg (talk) 16:15, 15 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

I considered not spamming talk pages but not saying "thanks" just isn't me. The support was remarkable and appreciated. I only hope that I am able to help a little on here. Please let me know if I can help you or equally if you find any of my actions questionable. Thanks & regards --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:23, 16 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for correcting the spelling of the Klev(e)ner in the Alsace-related entries, including the article I started as Klevner de Heiligenstein, and which was signifiantly expanded by another WikiProject Wine member using my mis-spelling. I checked it up in "Oxford Encylopedia of Wine", and you were quite correct. I'm quite amazed that I've never noted that extra e before! Tomas e (talk) 20:17, 5 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

It's PD - It's from an 1880s German encyclopedia. I forget the name but I will put it on Commons. WhisperToMe (talk) 02:12, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

If you have a chance, it'd be great to have someone check over this page for accuracy. I machine-translated it from the French wiki article, and I speak no French. Chubbles (talk) 12:23, 23 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I was merely trying to make this website more relevant. Things that do not have a place in wiki such as articles for the sake of humor should not be posted.

Please delete the article at your soonest convienance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.229.227.144 (talk) 21:27, 5 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello Korg, usually I am very comfortable in my anglophone Englisch über alles comfort zone though mycology is one area where there is alot of non-english content I cannot read. I made a stubby stub for Claude Casimir Gillet it may be good to expand from French sources. I have also embellished several european fungi like Entoloma sinuatum, Tricholoma pardinum, and Inocybe patouillardii, while Boletus eastwoodiae is now Boletus pulcherrimus.

Narcisse Théophile Patouillard is still a redlink

I have Entoloma sinuatum at WP:GAN currently and had thoughts of getting some of Boletus satanas, Tricholoma pardinum, Inocybe patouillardii or Boletus edulis up there at some stage. Any more material, folkloric/anecdotal/scientific or otherwise which could be reffed or added would be great. Similarly, I have never seen much on the french-discovered Amanita verna in English either..cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:53, 8 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'd appreciate it if you could dab the pages for the communes for each department and clear the path for me so I wont have to go back and fill them in. Thanks, I;m going through in alphabetical ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 22:01, 16 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for sorting out the link for the peer review. Article went through a series of name changes, but seems to have settled now. Mjroots (talk) 12:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome. Korg (talk) 12:28, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I think I might have done something wrong along the way. Could you let me know what exactly you wanted Barret to say? ... discospinster _talk 16:01, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

As long as everything is OK now. Let me know whenever you need a hand. ... discospinster _talk 18:48, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I was looking after an article that I created and discovered that it is on your list of redlinked plants -- a list that is more linked than not linked when I looked at it today. Can I remove either the articles that I have written or all of the not red link articles from that list? I was trying to clean up the 'what links here' list.... -- carol (talk) 22:46, 23 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've removed all the links. Regards, Korg (talk) 18:47, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hey, thanks for that! I would have been willing to do this.... -- carol (talk) 18:50, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Many thanks for updating this article. I moved it, but completely forgot to check the actual contents! Kiwipete (talk) 22:01, 6 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kiwipete, you're welcome. Thanks to your move, I've noticed that several other communes were renamed in 2006, so I've updated their articles accordingly. Regards, Korg (talk) 22:53, 6 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

what the fuck are you talking about???

216.229.238.57 (talk) 00:14, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

My comment was probably not directed to you. You can avoid further irrelevant messages by creating an account. Regards, Korg (talk) 16:54, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I got fed up of the never-endless edit war, and reported both users (I suspect some type of sockpuppetry) to AIV. Basketball110 _{pick away...} 00:25, 11 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! I've also requested the article to be temporarily semi-protected. Korg (talk) 00:42, 11 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for fixing the double redirect. You're not by any chance an admin so you could fix the main page too, are you? Awien (talk) 00:29, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome. No, I'm not an admin; I'll post a note at WP:ERRORS. Best regards, Korg (talk) 00:35, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've been trying - nobody's listening. Awien (talk) 00:42, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Finally, the link was corrected, but it lasted only 11 minutes.^[3] Korg (talk) 12:24, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

It's a problem I've run into before. Not sure why, but I suspect it's a combination of not feeling qualified to make the choice and being afraid of stirring up a hornets' nest. But other times problems have been fixed almost instantly, so you never can tell. Bonne journée! Awien (talk) 12:58, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello Alexf,

I noticed you deleted the article Olivier Girault a few days ago. I don't know what was the content, but I think the subject is sufficiently notable to warrant an article. Could you please restore it? Thanks, Korg (talk) 14:51, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done: Article is incomplete, does not show much about the person, and did not assert notability as per WP:ATHLETE. Unless you work on it soon, there are no guarantees that another admin may not remove it as per A7. -- Alexf⁴² 17:18, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

See User:Korg/Sandbox. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 17:58, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

What is the reason of this edit? Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 04:30, 4 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the advise. Would you explain me what "blank" means? Can the talkheader be added if project tags are added in the talk page? Does it mean the talk page must have some conversation to add this header? Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 18:01, 4 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

In the Manet section of the article: Courbet painted Baudelaire in his "L’Atelier du peintre" not Manet. The detail from the Courbet painting is already at the end of the article.Highdesertrussell (talk) 16:04, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Highdesertrussell (talk) 15:20, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

The article was also previously deleted by another admin. Although deleted as non-notable, it could equally have been speedied as spam His first album that gained mass public attention... or This album is contains songs full of energy and others more calm... The content is unsourced, and the only one of the three ext links that has even a shred of credibility dates from 1999, and does not establish notability. He may be notable, but there is nothing in the article to suggests that he meets the criteria. I am not prepared to restore as it stands, but if you want to work on it, let me know and I'll sandbox the text for you jimfbleak (talk) 14:53, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Deleted text is here jimfbleak (talk) 05:21, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for that. I had started notes toward a small essay on the steady deterioration of WP articles, but I've only gotten 10% of the way through the ~2050 changes since this article's start. I was thinking of calling it "Ground under foot - effects of bad edits stick", or maybe "How Chewing gum lost its flavor"? But if people like you recover the lost good bits... hey, maybe there'll be a happy ending? Shenme (talk) 05:20, 24 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

No problem. I was like, "It's a freaking redirect! You can stop vandalizing now..." J.delanoy^gabs_adds 19:39, 7 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi,

I want to update information on a certain article because it is old and outdated. I tried making changes on Monday but they were erased and I recieved a message from you saying I cannot use this site for promotional purposes. Am I allowed to list products and endorsements for this company? Please advise me on what I can and cannot say. Thank you. Ccommuni (talk) 17:01, 22 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

It is not mentioned in the second article. cygnis insignis 23:51, 30 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

If there are multiple pages with that name, create the page using WP:Disambiguation as a guide. The hatnote and reverts without reason are unwarranted. The list you linked would leave the reader full of awe. cygnis insignis 02:37, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

If you will pardon the pun, Korg :) I'm not sure what the solution is, let me know if you ever happen to find a clever way of supplying the data in a neutral way. I would click through that toilet door listing and wisdom to find one, but I'm busy watching a soap opera in user space. I had a go at the dabs I could find. Regards, cygnis insignis 21:29, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Okay, you have my full attention. It turned out the newly introduced character was an old one 'back from the dead'. No redemption or novel plot devices, but like those other soaps they hook you in. Any way ...

The wiktionary link was an good addition, I think you found the solution to what I saw as an inherent problem. We are not a dictionary, but we can link one that is as cool as our encyclopedia. Linking a dab to another is best avoided, the reader would have some context for their search on the word, the links should go straight to articles when possible. This is often done with "may also refer to:" sections that do not begin with a link. If the links are terms that are often pluralised, there might be a see also section, I found some surnames as well. It goes without saying that this is my interpretation of guidelines, common sense, and useful improvements. What I find personally acceptable is irrelevant, sorry if I gave that impression. I changed the section heading here. Cheers, cygnis insignis 07:33, 1 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

I deleted the redirects because, for most of them, I pointed all the former redirect-links to the actual ones. I guess I missed a few. You have a valid point though; I'll check. Cheers and keep up the good work, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 01:57, 12 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

They all used to be dabs that linked to other dabs which are now housed in the pages I moved them to, so I don't think there's too a need to restore them. Also, I eliminated the "4th of July (song)" redirect as there was only one page linking to it; no use for a redirect if nobody is going to it, right? Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 02:01, 12 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:DP logo.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:34, 20 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Dotnf.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:40, 26 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done and my apologies for the mistake. Don't really know how I missed that... Thingg^⊕⊗ 02:14, 8 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done Thingg^⊕⊗ 22:03, 22 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the update! I was going to do it, but my Internet connection went off until now. Regards, Korg (talk) 19:39, 3 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for removing the accidental duplicate link! Please see my edit summary for an explanation of why archive 166 isn't linked.  :) —David Levy 22:09, 3 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I see, sorry for that! Korg (talk) 22:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

No problem! I should have explained the change at the time. —David Levy 23:58, 3 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

La page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Korg/Red_links/Biology) contient un redlink pour l'article de Chat du Martelli.

J'ai récemment écrit cet article. Vous pouvez vouloir enlever cet article de votre sous-page. Amities, Seduisant (talk) 15:49, 1 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Done, and I've created the redirects. Thanks! Korg (talk) 15:23, 21 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have nominated Millionaires, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Millionaires. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Cirt (talk) 19:34, 22 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the note, though I haven't created this article, I just created a redirect to Millionaire. I'll notify Killercalamari, the actual creator. Korg (talk) 20:24, 22 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello Korg, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, Millionaires (band), has been marked for speedy deletion by User:Korg. This has been done because the page seems to be about a person, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:Korg. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of Korg (talk · contribs) 11:27, 2 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Mr. Bones requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Davnor (talk) 18:22, 3 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:FEBS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:15, 11 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Villa mitre.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:31, 5 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:24, 19 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Well, thank you :-) Korg (talk) 20:12, 26 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mont. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mont. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Doprendek (talk) 02:59, 9 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wikimania 2005 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikimania 2005 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ypnypn (talk) 21:19, 8 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I'm a steward. A new policy regarding the removal of "advanced rights" (administrator, bureaucrat, etc.) was adopted by community consensus recently. According to this policy, the stewards are reviewing administrators' activity on wikis with no inactivity policy.

You meet the inactivity criteria (no edits and no log actions for 2 years) on yiwiktionary, where you are an administrator. Since yiwiktionary does not have its own administrators' rights review process, the global one applies.

If you want to keep your rights, you should inform the community of the wiki about the fact that the stewards have sent you this information about your inactivity. If the community has a discussion about it and then wants you to keep your rights, please contact the stewards at m:Stewards' noticeboard, and link to the discussion of the local community, where they express their wish to continue to maintain the rights, and demonstrate a continued requirement to maintain these rights.

We stewards will evaluate the responses. If there is no response at all after approximately one month, we will proceed to remove your administrative rights. In cases of doubt, we will evaluate the responses and will refer a decision back to the local community for their comment and review. If you have any questions, please contact us on m:Stewards' noticeboard.

Best regards, Rschen7754 05:23, 10 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

I've noticed you've used the phrase "unnecessary disambiguation" in the past. I've contributed heavily to the essay about that concept, WP:Unnecessary disambiguation, and was wondering if you would review it and comment about it on the talk page, especially in terms of whether you think it accurately reflects consensus on what "unnecessary disambiguation" means on WP, and, if not, how it could be improved to do so. Thanks! --В²C ☎ 20:46, 18 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply