Great Mercian

Hello, Great Mercian, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Mapping (Youtube), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 16:17, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Mapping (Youtube), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
• It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 16:17, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Mapping (Youtube), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
• It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 17:36, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the content guideline, the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide or the edit notice on any DOY page. Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 21:37, 8 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prince (musician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ecstasy. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

 Template:EpTab has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:18, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 20:08, 12 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 20:18, 12 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

I don't necessarily believe them to be disruptive, can you please give me a reason why? Great Mercian (talk) 20:57, 12 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

I can. I asked you in your talk thread (this one) (after telling me to "suck it"[1]) to elaborate, using your policies and guidelines to make your case. The refusal to answer simple questions is listed at the disprutive editing policy as one of the our nonexclusive list of signs of disruptive editing. Also related, Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 21:00, 12 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

firstly I don't get notifications from talk pages as i do with user talk pages like this one, and secondly who said they were my guidelines? Great Mercian (talk) 21:05, 12 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

This [2] and its edit summary are disruptive. Further behavior of that kind may lead to topic bans. Acroterion (talk) 21:06, 12 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Great Mercian,

Thank you for creating Sukhumi Lighthouse.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for this article. More secondary independent sources would be useful. For example, see https://usefultravelarticles.com/9294-sukhumi-cape-and-lighthouse-description-and-photos-abkhazia-sukhumi.html

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Rsjaffe}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

— rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:22, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hey

I was hoping other people would help finish it.

Great Mercian (talk) 18:01, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on English phonology. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Nardog (talk) 22:02, 7 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Nardog: whether I am edit warring or not (which by the way you instigated so I don't know why you're pinning the blame on me) doesn't change the fact that phonetically, the information you so vehemently defend is incorrect. I did explain that I do speak that dialect, while it may not be Received Pronounciation it is close enough to it. To use another example other than lot, 'not' pronounced with a /ɔ:/ would be 'nought' (/nɔ:t/) and not 'not', which is pronounced as /nɒt/ (stress omitted for simplicity's sake). I personally don't understand why you take a problem with every phonological edit I either make or propose (I.e. italicising ä in the vowel template due to it not being an official symbol). Great Mercian (talk) 22:20, 7 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please see Talk:English phonology/Archive 4#RP table. If you believe in your argument, state it there, so other editors can see it. If they agree with you, I'll be obliged to keep your edit, because Wikipedia takes consensus as the fundamental method of decision making. Your characterization that I "instigated" doesn't comport with WP:BRD, a process widely observed to facilitate and enforce consensus. I didn't even recognize your username; I just happened to come across both times. Nardog (talk) 22:49, 7 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Pranesh Ravikumar (talk) 15:26, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello Great Mercian, I've just discovered that in January you created (as a redirection) a page, Coat of arms of Catalonia, that had been previously deleted. The reason for deleting the page, which had no opposition in the discussion, is simply that Catalonia doesn't have a coat of arms, and furthermore, if it had one it would be preposterous that it was the same as that of the kings of Aragón, a different territory (You can find more about the subject in this discussion). Therefore, I urge you to delete the page yourself. Thank you. Jotamar (talk) 22:12, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Jotamar: I checked the deletion discussion (which for obvious reasons I can no longer accessed.) and it basically boiled down to the coat of arms was exactly the same as Aragon's (If it wasn't then I admit I was most likely misinterpreting it, I was dealing with another situation around that time which really stressed me out so that may very well be the reason why.). If you could provide a link to said discussion that would be wonderful.

However, I would also like to mention that as I am not an admin, I don't have deletion perms, so I'm afraid I can't delete the page (I would hesitate to call it a page, though.).

I hope this helps resolve the issue. Great Mercian (talk) 23:43, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi again @Jotamar: I admit it was stupid to say I couldn't access the link, here it is, I hope this clears up everything. Thanks. Great Mercian (talk) 23:53, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello again, first of all notice that the coat of arms we're speaking about is not the one of Aragon, but of the kings of Aragon, which is quite a different thing. In the Middle Ages, territories didn't have any symbol, only families from the royalty or the nobility had them. Identifying territories (nations, regions, etc.) with a flag or a coat of arms is a more recent thing. About the deletion, if you agree with it, using the Wikipedia:Proposed deletion procedure should be quite straightforward as long as the editor asking for it is the same one that created the page, that's what I meant when I asked you to delete it. Best regards. --Jotamar (talk) 00:09, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Jotamar:, as I am quoting from @Neodop: (who is more than welcome to chip in) "this article is essentially a duplicate, almost word for word, of the Coat of arms of the Crown of Aragon, which is used de facto as the coat of arms of Catalonia." I merely made the redirect as it seemed that any non-duplicated content was moved into said article. I won't be removing the redirect. Great Mercian (talk) 08:39, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

I didn't remember that particular comment by user:Neodop, and I don't agree with it. Having the coat of arms of the Kings of Aragon as the specific symbol of Catalonia is tantamount to, let's say, having one particular state in the USA, for example Nebraska, declare that the flag of their state was the star-spangled banner, which then would be at the same time the flag of the whole US and the flag specific to the state of Nebraska. On the other hand the government of the Spanish autonomous community of Catalonia has never declared any coat of arms for their region, unlike the rest of autonomous communities, and that is obviously linked to what I have just explained. A different thing is that Catalan nationalists decided in the 19th century to use the badge of the kings of Aragon as their main national symbol, and you can find the four bars used in flags, scarfs, jerseys, key chains, culinary items and whatnot ever since in Catalonia; that includes the occasional shield, however that use is necessarily unofficial, in addition to historically wrong. --Jotamar (talk) 23:28, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Jotamar: I'm too tired to keep going with this conversation, it's clear to me you're confusing historical and contemporary use of a coat of arms. if you can provide me with contemporary government documents that show the crest or not that would be swell. also I'd like to point out that your flag analogy really doesn't work as that's exactly what Newfoundland and Labrador did in 1952. I think the best thing you can do is let this go. best regards, Great Mercian (talk) 23:10, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Jotamar: I'm still waiting on the contemporary government documents you can provide. Great Mercian (talk) 20:03, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Well obviously there are no official documents stating that the coat of arms of the kings of Aragón is not the coat of arms of Catalonia. Armand de Fluvià, a Catalan historian close to Catalan nationalism, wrote a small paper called Catalunya un país sense escut (Catalonia, a country with no coat of arms). The paper might be from 2019. He says: "Com a Assessor d'Heràldica i Genealogia de Catalunya que sóc per nomenament presidencial, i també com a president de la Institució Catalana de Genealogia i Heràldica, fa anys que gent del país i de fora ens pregunta i vol saber quin és l'escut de Catalunya com a país, i hem de respondre que oficialment no en té." My translation: As a consultant of Heraldry and Genealogy for Catalonia, that I am by presidential appointment [from the president of the Catalan government], and also as president of the Catalan Institution of Genealogy and Heraldry, people from this country and from elsewhere have been asking us for years and want to know which is the coat of arms of Catalonia as a country, and we have to answer that officially it [Catalonia] hasn't any. --Jotamar (talk) 21:00, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Jotamar:, just a few more things. De jure and De facto are two different things, I.e. Türkiye de jure doesn't have a coat of arms however de facto uses the star and crescent, if we've defined that Catalonia doesn't have a de jure coat of arms, does it use a de facto coat of arms? Also the passage describes Catalonia as a country, whereas it might be depending on your standpoint, it is legally an autonomous collectively. I would like some clarification to these things, thanks. Great Mercian (talk) 21:15, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

I don't know how it could be used as the de facto coat of arms of Catalonia. What you don't seem to grasp is that the colours of the coat of arms (alternating yellow and red stripes) were appropriated, so to speak, by Catalan nationalism in the 19th century, as main symbol for their nation. Since then, everything related to Catalonia features prominently those colours, which appear in about everything that you can think of, from sweaters to pastry, and of course someone could easily have had the idea of including the colours in a shield, in any sort of personal document, for historical effect, but that is a marginal use not to be taken seriously. --Jotamar (talk) 21:47, 5 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

About the word country, I was translating Catalan/Spanish país, which apparently is not a perfect match in meaning, since país doesn't necessarily imply nation. Though of course for Catalan nationalists Catalonia is both a país and a nation. --Jotamar (talk) 21:47, 5 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Jotamar: oh no, I've perfectly grasped that. I understand the four bars were copied wholesale by Catalan nationalists, in fact you've said it enough times I'm starting to suspect unionist bias. maybe I should've clarified when you said "there are no official documents stating that the coat of arms of the kings of Aragón is not the coat of arms of Catalonia." Can you please show me a government document with the four bars on. thanks. Great Mercian (talk) 00:17, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

I can't claim a perfect neutral point of view in this question, since I'm from Aragon, but the same is true of Catalan editors. As for the independence of Catalonia, I have no particular principle against it, currently I'm not for it but with a change of political or social circumstances I can imagine I might become in favor of it. --Jotamar (talk) 00:53, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Official documents of the Catalan Government typically include the Seal of the Generalitat de Catalunya. It resembles a coat of arms but it's not it, I think there is a clear conceptual difference, and the text of Mr. Fluvià that I cited above fully confirms that. --Jotamar (talk) 00:53, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Jotamar: So therefore, the Seal of the Generalitat de Catalunya is the de facto seal of Catalonia, and as we see with most US states, seals are essentially C.O.A., therefore redirecting Coat of arms of Catalonia to the above article would be the right solution. I think we've come to a solution! just need a source confirming it. Great Mercian (talk) 01:10, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

I'll look for one as soon as I have time. --Jotamar (talk) 14:49, 7 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

As you can see, I haven't had much time in the last months, anyway I want to say that this is still in my to do list. Regards. --Jotamar (talk) 18:19, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

There is currently a Request Move discussion about William IV. Since you participated in the previous move discussion involving William IV, I thought you might want to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 19:36, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Rreagan007:, I didn't really participate in the discussion in question, as all I did was post a {{chips}} template. Quite frankly discussions like this just don't interest me. Great Mercian (talk) 20:13, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding North Korean involvement in the Russian Invasion of Ukraine. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Russian Invasion of Ukraine.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

--Rc2barrington (talk) 00:17, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Cinderella157 (talk) 01:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

You recently made this edit. It appears to me to be uncivil, if not a personal attack and certainly not a reasonable comment. I would suggest that you strike it. Cinderella157 (talk) 01:40, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Folkezoft. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Talk:2024 Trump rally at Madison Square Garden seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Folkezoft (talk) 15:39, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Cinderella157 (talk) 04:10, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hey Great Mercian, sorry I couldn't reply sooner but regarding previous successful Afds of shootings in the US, just scroll through this search list and you'll find a bunch (giving a quick look, I already found one about Smithsburg that got deleted over the summer). I strongly urge that you thoroughly read through the deletion discussion and consider the comments/concerns expressed about each article before moving to recreate them. Hope this helps and feel free to message any questions that come up! Thanks, Dan the Animator 15:15, 4 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Antitransphobe. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparisons between Donald Trump and fascism that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I would suggest to WP:REMOVEUNCIVIL this comment: [3] Antitransphobe (talk) 22:48, 5 November 2024 (UTC)Reply