ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 curling season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clermont, Quebec. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Allan Higdon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Hume. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 1 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 curling season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yichun. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 22 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2016 Tim Hortons Brier
added a link pointing to TD Place
Tim Hortons Brier
added a link pointing to TD Place

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 7 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michael Qaqish, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Derek Lee. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 14 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Lady Davina Lewis for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lady Davina Lewis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lady Davina Lewis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Re5x (talk) 15:44, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced New Brunswick elections

edit

Hey Earl, as our resident expert on Canadian elections, have you run into a source for older New Brunswick elections? I'm working on cleaning up the oldest unreferenced articles and all the NB elections from 1930 and earlier on on that list. I haven't been able to find a source online, do you know of a book or almanac that might have this info? - SimonP (talk) 14:34, 28 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

No, sorry. -- Earl Andrew - talk 15:04, 28 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 Viterra Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alex Forrest. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello's from Russian curling-fans

edit

Hello, Earl! Our Russian curling fans (from group "All about curling" in social net "VKontakte", vk.com) send you - and all "collegues" in Canada (players, coaches, fans) - their "Hi!" and (especially for you) "Thank you!" for great lot of interesting information about "chess on ice" in Eng-Wiki (from where I'm translating to Ru-Wiki; for example, today I created - it means "translated" mainly - articles about Pat Simmons and Kevin Koe). Our fans in VK-group - from Moscow, Saint Petersburg, Yekaterinburg (like me), Novosibirsk etc etc. big and small cities and villages around Russia. We all love curling, many of us watched STOH, will watching Brier starting today, waiting juniors WC's, men's and women's WC's. Good curling! Make "Hard!" not war! :)) -- Alexey Gustow (talk) 19:23, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! I live in Ottawa, and I plan on attending a few games, including the draws tonight. :-) -- Earl Andrew - talk 20:32, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
:) Wow! Watching live Brier - it's cool! I watched at (our) deep night on TSN-1 Gushue vs McEwen - and I'll plan to watch at (our) morning NO vs SK (if I willn't asleep ;) ). We are on opposite sides of glob - but we all are same "crazy" :)) -- Alexey Gustow (talk) 00:33, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
Glad to see you love the game as much as I do. I ended up being a few rows behind the NO vs. SK game. My father said he saw us on TV! :-) -- Earl Andrew - talk 05:34, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
Ho-ho! ))) So now when I'll watch Brier matches and see audience - I will cry (just in case): "Hi Earl! Haaaard!!" )))) -- Alexey Gustow (talk) 16:26, 8 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Medal table (by skips) in Ru-"Tim Hortons Brier" - maybe need for En?

edit

Earl, I created yesterday a table in Ru "Tim hortons Brier" article - similar like "Top 3 finishers" (by province) in En-article, but by skips. Maybe it needed for En-article? Look at this section of Ru-article. This is 3 separated tables: left - skips who have at least one gold medal; center - who haven't gold but have at least one silver, right - who have only bronze. About 2-3 places in 1927-2008 (about lot of "ancient" Brier's there is no Wiki-articles in En or any wikis) - look at (if there is no Wiki-article) refs (below section). -- Alexey Gustow (talk) 16:48, 8 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Very nice. I'm afraid the Brier article is getting quite cluttered. If something like this were to be created, we'd have to create a page on Brier statistics. As for ancient Briers, you might want to check out this page: http://soudogcurling.tripod.com/Brier/macdonaldbrier.html -- Earl Andrew - talk 16:51, 8 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
OK, I am glad that it's useful. You right - separate "Brier statistics" page can be good solution (I thought about that for my Ru-article). My refs (below this section) links to Soudogcurling (good source!) - Brier "root" page (1st) and Brier Record Book (no needed for this case - but huge of "statistics"!). -- Alexey Gustow (talk) 17:12, 8 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Jarkova

edit

How is "personal romanization" more important than correct transliteration? Moreover, how about this: [1]. She is not a philologist to understand how to transliterate corretly. So she may describe her name is Zhjdarkouvva or whatever.--Orel787 (talk) 19:18, 12 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

She personally spells her name with a "J", and that is also how it is spelled on her World Curling Federation profile. It may not be the correct Romanization of her name, but we have to respect WP:COMMONNAME, especially if that is the name she uses herself. -- Earl Andrew - talk 21:19, 12 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
My opinion about such cases is: she can spells how she wants - but Wikipedia reader, who don't know Russian, must have from en-Wiki article an information about "how I can correctly pronounce her surname?"... For En-spoken people usually Russian "Ж" (Жаркова) transliterates (as I know) "on paper" like "ZH"; and this is correct I mean for WP - because if first symbol in surname is "J" (like "Jackson" - "Джексон"), on Russian it writes like "Дж" (DZH) or (less often - and mainly for Scandinavian or North Europe people) like "Я" (YA - like in "young"). So (I imagine) what En-spoken man will try to speak when he seen surname "Jarkova"? "ZHa(h)rko(h)va(h)" (correct) or "YArko(h)va(h)" (wrong)? (with accent on "hard O" and with "hard AH" at the end). Excuse my "not the best" speech - I'm not a philologist too, I'm only Russian "from wild West of Siberia" :) My advice: put pronounciation (like in Kevin Koe) to article (for people, who want to know this info). -- Alexey Gustow (talk) 22:19, 12 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Two "musical" questions

edit

Hi Earl! I have two "musical" questions about Canadian curling:

  1. What means "Albeeeeertaaaa!!" from crowd (with laughing and other fun) on curling tournaments running in Canada? Is it from any well-known Canadian song? Or what?
  2. "Main musical theme" on Canadian curling tournaments (we can listen it very often in any match - at the beginning, at the end and at pauses; strings, brasses, drums and so on) - it's "only instrumental" music (hasn't lyrics) or it's a song? If song - where I can read lyrics and/or listen it in internet?..

P.S. Congrats from Russian curl fans to Team Koe and all in Canada for superb win on WMCC 2016! Last shot by Kevin was incredible!! -- Alexey Gustow (talk) 22:39, 12 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

The "Albeeeeertaaaa" thing is more of a cheer than a song. You will hear people doing that for other provinces too. As for your second question, I'm not sure what exactly you're referring to. Any examples? -- Earl Andrew - talk 23:29, 12 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
For me "Albeeeeertaaaa" sounds like "anti-cheering", addressed to opposite team (it means, like I think, something like "You are worse than our mighty guys, they'll beat you in any case"), sounds like citation from any all-known (in Canada or all North America) song (and all "ours" - when listen it - understand about what it and start sarcastically laughs to "enemies"). About "main musical theme" - it plays very often on every TV coverage of Canadian curling tournaments; for example look at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYP8mdk0BY8 (this music starts at 1:00). By the way: I googled interesting article "Ten Great Songs About Curling" (http://www.chartattack.com/news/2010/02/12/10-songs-about-curling/) - and one of them, "Tournament of Hearts" by The Weakerthans, is really "great" for my "old rock" heart :) -- Alexey Gustow (talk) 23:13, 16 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
Ahh, that is Curling on TSN's theme song that plays on any curling coverage on that network. As for the "anti-cheering", I can see why one would think that, as it does sound like heckling, but I am pretty sure it is not an actual heckle. Cheers. -- Earl Andrew - talk 23:38, 16 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, Earl, for explanation about "Curling on TSN theme song" - now I'll know and will answer to others who want to know :) By the way: I "constructed" short article about Czech woman curler Anna Kubešková (not existed in any Wikis); she plays now on WMDCC 2016. If you interested - look at Ru-wiki to ru:Кубешкова, Анна. -- Alexey Gustow (talk) 19:13, 17 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Earl Andrew. You have new messages at Talk:Jennifer Gates.
Message added 23:56, 12 April 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DES (talk) 23:56, 12 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

2016

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Winterysteppe (talk) 13 April 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Winterystepe (talkcontribs)

Date of birth

edit

Do you think that a listing on http://www.curlingzone.com constitutes wide publication, as required by WP:DOB? If so, you might want to post your reasons on Talk:Jennifer Gates. Did you read my talk page comments? I urge you to do so, if you didn't. I won't edit war over this, but I do urge a second thought. DES (talk) 00:19, 13 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

In the curling world, yes. To be on the safe side I added a reference to her profile on the World Curling Federation website. -- Earl Andrew - talk 13:27, 14 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disregard the warning. That previous person was an imposter

edit

Hi, early you received a post about being warned from being blocked. That was an imposter who created a similar username, but with only 1 “p” at User:Winterystepe. He's now blocked. im just letting you know that Im the real person and I won't do that. Shoutout to Tassedethe for taking quick action in 6 minutes. Happy Editing Winterysteppe (talk) 00:32, 13 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Maples (electoral district), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gary Kowalski. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 20 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Untitled

edit

WHEY ARE YOU SOCK PUPPETING ME — Preceding unsigned comment added by PIZZAPIZZAPOPS (talkcontribs) 22:35, 23 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mick Lizmore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2014 The National. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 29 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of mayors in New Brunswick, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tracadie. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 11 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Piotr-anweiler.JPG listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Piotr-anweiler.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:46, 13 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of mayors in Quebec, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page L'Ange-Gardien, Quebec. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 20 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Alphabetization

edit

Le, la, l' or les, at the start of a French title, function the same way as "the" does at the start of an English one. That is, "L'Assomption" is alphabetized as if it starts with A, not as if it starts with L. Bearcat (talk) 18:14, 20 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please cite Wikipedia policy that states that. Almost every English language reference list I've seen disagrees with you. -- Earl Andrew - talk 19:48, 20 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016–17 curling season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clermont, Quebec. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 28 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

edit

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:50, 1 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Conservative Party of Canada leadership election, 2017, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doug Ford. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 17 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amanda Gates, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yichun. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 28 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please claim your upload(s): File:Saskmap.PNG

edit

Hi, This image was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices, Thank you.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm, that it was your own work, by marking it as {{own}}, amending the {{information}} added by a third party, and by changing the license to an appropriate "self" variant. You can also add |claimed=yes to the {{Media by uploader}} or {{Presumed self}} tag(s) if present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).

This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transfered to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:29, 8 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of teams on the 2016–17 World Curling Tour, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gangwon and Aomori. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 8 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2016 Carleton Ravens football team
added a link pointing to TD Place
List of teams on the 2016–17 World Curling Tour
added a link pointing to Yamanashi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 15 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 World Cup of Hockey statistics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ryan O'Reilly. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 22 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Extended confirmed protection

edit

Hello, Earl Andrew. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

  • Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
  • A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Ontario Provincial Confederation of Regions Party for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ontario Provincial Confederation of Regions Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ontario Provincial Confederation of Regions Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Me-123567-Me (talk) 21:39, 18 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nova Scotia municipal elections, 2016

edit

I was trying to be troublesome in deleting the redlinks on this page. Thank you for you other edits of it by the way. I merely removed them so as not to entice someone into wasting their timre in writing an article. See this discussion here about why municipal pols are not considered 'notable': Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waye Mason. Verne Equinox (talk) 23:35, 18 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi, that person is a city councillor, not a mayor. The red links on that page are to mayors of municipalities that I feel are large enough to warrant articles. From what I can tell on Wikipedia, the threshold on Wikipedia is ambiguous in this regard, but often mayors of places as large Charlottetown have articles. -- Earl Andrew - talk 01:35, 19 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
I should re-read my posts a little better: It should have said I was NOT trying to be troublesome. Sorry about that. Meanwhile, though I disagree with you, I respect your reason, given the lack of clarity. Cheers. Verne Equinox (talk) 12:35, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
No worries. I do admit, I am an inclusionist, so there you go. Cheers. -- Earl Andrew - talk 14:09, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Washburncoa.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Washburncoa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:14, 27 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Mayors

edit

The rule for notability of mayors is that the population has to be much closer to 100K before they get an automatic presumption of notability just for existing as mayors. The mayor of a smaller city can get an article if they can be explicitly sourced over WP:GNG, but the mayor of a city with just 33K does not get an automatic presumption of notability or an entitlement to have his name presumptively redlinked in every single article it appears in. Bearcat (talk) 15:05, 27 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi, could you point me in the direction towards this rule? -- Earl Andrew - talk 15:07, 27 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
You need to familiarize yourself with the corpus of precedents actually reached in actual AFD discussions, because a rule doesn't have to be explicitly codified in a policy document to be a real rule. WP:POLOUTCOMES just states "mayors of cities of regional prominence", which is vague and leaves too much open to interpretation — so if you actually read real AFDs on mayors you'll see how it's defined in actual practice: a mayor must always pass WP:GNG to be kept. If that depth and quality of sourcing is not already present, then a "presumption of notability" (also known as "the benefit of the doubt") is granted if the city is a large one approaching or exceeding 100K in population, where GNG is likely to become passable because the city is prominent enough that coverage in quality sources can be reasonably expected — but they can then still be deleted if their sourceability ultimately proves weak enough. But for any city smaller than that, a mayor gets an article only if the sourcing already passes GNG right off the bat. If you really think Greg Dionne can pass NPOL, then by all means you can try to write an article about him that's substantive enough and sourced well enough to get him over GNG — but 35K is not large enough to grant him an automatic presumption of notability just for existing as a mayor. Bearcat (talk) 15:26, 27 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I've read the rules, and am well aware of them. It sounds to me that we're in disagreement about where the threshold is for presumed notability based on available sources. Whereas you think 100K should be the cutoff, I think it should be much lower, as there are plenty of sources available for mayors of cities that are smaller than 100K.. If you can point to me where this 100K rule is actual precedent, and not just some personal rule-of-thumb you've adopted, I would be happy to comply. Otherwise, it's just your arbitrary cut-off vs. mine. -- Earl Andrew - talk 15:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
I'm not making up my own arbitrary "personal" cutoff — I'm reporting the actual stone-cold truth of what actually happens when mayors of small cities are actually taken to AFD. Consensus is not defined solely by the literal letter of a policy document — policy documents are actually lagging indicators of the actual state of consensus — but by familiarity with actual practice in actual situations, and the actual practice is that cities of 35K (or even 70K) quite routinely have their mayors' articles deleted if they aren't sourced over GNG to more than just the local newspaper. Bearcat (talk) 15:47, 27 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Your interpretation of precedent doesn't make it a rule, though; and certainly not one that you alone have the power to enforce. -- Earl Andrew - talk 16:13, 27 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
It's not my "interpretation" of precedent — AFD decides what the precedents are, not me. Bearcat (talk) 16:38, 27 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Are articles deleted based on population size or are they based on lack of sources? -- Earl Andrew - talk 18:18, 27 October 2016 (UTC)Reply


Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

edit

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

edit

Hi Earl Andrew.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 15 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Bankfield Road (Ottawa) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bankfield Road (Ottawa) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bankfield Road (Ottawa) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MB 04:42, 16 November 2016 (UTC)Reply