Talk:Spider-Gwen

Comics: Marvel Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.

2010s Low‑importance

	2010s portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Scope

Latest comment: 8 years ago7 comments4 people in discussion

I suppose the main issue with this is whether this article is about the title or the character. On the face of it, it appears to be on the title, but then it goes off and includes a FCB that covers the characters other appearances.

Not a deal-breaker at the moment (although it is difficult to do a B-class assessment because it is unclear what should and shouldn't be in this article) but, as things progress, it might be that this becomes a tricky balancing act and we might be better off splitting the character information off to Spider-Woman (Gwen Stacy) and keep this focused on the title. Personally, I don't think it needs doing now, I just wanted to flag this up so that when folks think it is getting creaky, they can start the process of sorting this out. Emperor (talk) 16:28, 29 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

I actually was feeling the same way. That's why I did it. I just now realized your comment about that. Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 04:06, 18 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

I agree, does it make sense to have a Spider-Woman (Gwen Stacy) article and Spider-Gwen? They should be mergedRachelskit (talk) 14:13, 25 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

You apparently weren't listening. We agreed to a split. One should focus on the character the other the comic book. Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 14:39, 25 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

You could easily merge this article into the "Fictional Character Biography" and add the publishing info into the publication history section and add a "collected edition" section on the bottom of the "Spider-Woman (Gwen Stacy)". Sorry, but I don't think it makes sense to have a separate article.Rachelskit (talk) 21:41, 25 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

I am opposing the merge. While the Spider-Gwen page should talk about the comic series, it should have a character section like the other alternate reality stories. That way, the character section can talk about the Earth-65 characters that don't have Earth-616 counterparts and brief information on those who do have Earth-616 counterparts. Any objections? --Rtkat3 (talk) 03:05, 30 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wouldn't there be a lot of duplication? Also confusion when people are searching for Spider-Gwen and they find two separate pages?Rachelskit (talk) 21:31, 30 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

artist?

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The infobox gives the artist as "Robbi Robriguez". But, here in Finland there was news in August that Finnish Rosi Kämpe is the artist for this. One article from Helsingin Sanomat tells Kämpe on Spider-Gwenin ainoa piirtäjä, joten lomaa ei oikeastaan ole. (Kämpe is the only artist for Spider-Gwen, so she does not actually have free time). Maybe it was in news in the US, or maybe the article is just out of date? (not so uncommon) 91.154.188.185 (talk) 01:01, 9 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic