Talk:Michael Novogratz

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleMichael Novogratz has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 20, 2013Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 23, 2013.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that self-made billionaire Michael Novogratz became USA Wrestling man of the year for his public service?


GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Michael Novogratz/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 03:18, 16 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Nominator: TonyTheTiger(T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD)

Hi. I will begin this review shortly. As it's my first so I'll be assisted by an experienced Wikipedian. I hope that's okay. --Seabuckthorn  03:18, 16 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


This biography appears to be in good shape and a promising nominee.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:  
    I think the article is ok and as far as I have checked up till now no problems with 1a.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
    See below (Fixed).
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
    Appears ok to me.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    In fact I must commend the nominator for organizing the meagre information that is available.
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
    appears fine to me
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
    (Who would dare to war with a wrestler Mr. Novo?  ).
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
    No images are available so we can't stress.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    Pass.


Issues with 1b: (Fixed)

OK, everything looks good now. Passing the article to GA status. --Seabuckthorn  02:48, 20 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Comment. The lede of the article currently includes sentence ""He is an advocate for the sport on the global stage." What sport? Currently there is no context provided, at all. I am guessing something must have been deleted, rendering this sentence nonsensical, for the moment. --doncram 20:43, 30 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Michael Novogratz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:54, 12 May 2017 (UTC)Reply