Talk:Bell

Service bells (the kind that are used by hotels) aren't included in the article, nor is a picture of one included. I don't see a separate article about this, maybe it should be added here.

Something is wrong. When I look at the edit history I see only my contribution. I didn't start the article. Rmhermen 15:46, Jun 30, 2004 (UTC)

Now the history is back -after a subsequent edit by Vampwillow. Not sure if this is a bug. Rmhermen 15:53, Jun 30, 2004 (UTC)

I've noticed this too over the last few days (including on articles I created!) but the history seems to reappear eventually. Nice job of re-editing btw ;-) --VampWillow 16:19, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)

The description of bells seems over-simplistic - "usually an open-ended hollow drum which resonates upon being struck" So is a cymbal a bell? Or a gong/tam-tam? What about jingles aka pellet bells? It would be my opinion that all three of those are not bells, although many would argue that the pellet bells are bells. Perhaps the def should read - an open-ended hollow or spherical drum (I don't care for that term - perhaps cup?) which resonates on being struck. I think it would be nice, also, to have a history section as well. After all, bells are among the oldest of instruments. Brad, 21 Apr 2007

I would be interested in the exact composition of the sound of bells. The waveform, spectrum, dynamic structure and some basic information would be helpful, all in about a paragraph. Is this considered notable encyclopedic information? bkil (talk) 12:27, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Is the link to Tibetan tingsha bells make sense at all? They are not bells, they are cymbals!!! Kowloonese (talk) 08:28, 8 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

This page states that the Tsar Bell is 160 tonnes, whereas the Tsar Bell says 216 tons; which is correct?

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Bell which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 18:15, 29 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

This section is currently quite a mess of units, with various different bells using one or two of tonnes, lbs and tons. One set of units (imperial or metric, probably the latter) should be picked as standard and the {{convert}} function used to provide an accurate conversion into the other. Thryduulf (talk) 00:20, 25 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

(Ref: The Colbert Report (2011.06.06) Werner Herzog as guest; Bells wiki ref is 8:50 into episode.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by J5robert (talk • contribs) 22:32, 16 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

LOCK THE PAGE! PAUL REVERE IS COMING AND HE IS TRYING TO WARN THE BRITISH WITH BELLS!

And now the page is locked with Sarah Palin still inside it. Good job, whoever signed off on that.

Knightskye (talk) 03:42, 7 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

That was me... And I've explained on your talk page. Grandmasterka 04:07, 7 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

• The article has been fully protected. With apologies to any legitimate editors who may be affected by it, I have s-protected the talk page temporarily. --B (talk) 03:56, 7 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
• Dear Stephen Colbert, Thanks ~so~ much for encouraging your viewers to become Wikipedia editors, and become contributing members of our community. We look forward to welcoming them and instructing them about Wikipedia standards. Say hi to Jimmy Fallon for me. Your fan, Robin. — Robin Lionheart (talk) 04:03, 7 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
• The more the merrier (: Kushal (talk) 16:01, 7 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

UnsignedIP -->

Please remove "Used by Paul Revere to warn the British they were not going to take our freedoms." from the topic "Church and temple bells". I believe this is a reference to the erroneous retelling of the history of Paul Revere by a well known public figure and should not be considered a legitimate historical source.

12.104.54.130 (talk) 17:28, 7 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Done Thanks for noticing! --Old Moonraker (talk) 17:39, 7 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

It was actually a reference to a request by stephen colbert on his television show to make that edit in ironic support of PalinLockeian (talk) 20:38, 7 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Bells: Used by Paul Revere to warn the British that hey, you're not going to succeed in taking our guns. USA! USA! 75.4.194.32 (talk) 18:00, 10 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed.- Happysailor ^(Talk) 19:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add "2080 lb" in the section Notable bells: "The Liberty Bell is a 2080 lb American bell of ..."; puts it in context.

Good idea:   Done, using a reference from Liberty Bell. Thanks, Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 12:24, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Why do you call the bell of the Dom Tower in Utrecht the second largest free-swinging bell in Europe ? Pretiosa in the Kolner Dom, Gloriosa in Erfurt, the Pummerin in Wien, Emmanuel in Paris, Potentienne and Savinienne in Sens, the big bell of Saint-Peter's in Rome, Sigmund in Prag, Gloriosa in Frankfurt, the big bell of the Kreuzkirche in Dresden, etc, are all larger and free-swinging. Thierry Pauwels. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.181.41.44 (talk) 18:56, 21 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Why and where does this article need additional citations for verification? What references does it need and how should they be added? Hyacinth (talk) 13:12, 14 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

This article is high risk for vandalism and edit warring from our page history point of view because there were lots of reverts shown. If the full protection request is approved, it will be locked for users to edit and only administrators will be allowed to edit the article to stop any further vandalism on the article. Let's see. 2.216.191.10 (talk) 14:53, 18 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

So can an approved editor add the Olympic bell into the article.MidlandLinda (talk) 10:10, 28 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

That has been done Dougsim (talk)

I think you should include a section about Shopkeepers Bells. I believe that is the term for them. Im talking about the type of bell you cheer at the entrance of a diner or a typical local door. The one that rings when you open the door. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.106.239.87 (talk) 05:38, 21 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

The fourth section of this article currently consists of a five-paragraph historical account of events which, although a bell does play a part in them, seem to have been insignificant even for the one bell involved. I propose to remove it entirely from this article. But perhaps it can be used towards the article Siege of Osaka, which appears to cover the same material. Unlikelyuser (talk) 23:07, 1 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

I have removed it now Unlikelyuser (talk) 06:36, 8 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Agree...probably added back when people were scrambling to find support for Sarah Pallin's bell comments. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:59, 8 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060521073710/http://www.china.org.cn:80/chinese/ch-tw/pic1/e-3.htm to http://www.china.org.cn/chinese/ch-tw/pic1/e-3.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140415072041/http://www.aragob.es/edycul/patrimo/etno/tesiscampanas/indice.htm to http://www.aragob.es/edycul/patrimo/etno/tesiscampanas/indice.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:30, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060521073710/http://www.china.org.cn/chinese/ch-tw/pic1/e-3.htm to http://www.china.org.cn/chinese/ch-tw/pic1/e-3.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:40, 17 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.cs.yale.edu/~douglas-craig/bells/Basic/what-is-a-carillon.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071018230102/http://www.andrelehr.nl/woboek/f_56.htm to http://www.andrelehr.nl/woboek/f_56.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110203021322/http://arts.cultural-china.com/en/30Arts391.html to http://arts.cultural-china.com/en/30Arts391.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:59, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi, there's a proposal to create an infobox for articles about notable individual bells that would benefit from input from anyone interested in bells. Please see the proposal and leave your comments at Draft talk:Bell infobox. — Kpalion^(talk) 16:06, 16 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

As late as the 10th century AD, European bells were no higher than 2 feet in height.

This is referenced to Joseph Needham, whose life's work was to claim all inventions were bigger, and better, and most importantly, invented first in China; a claim dutifully expounded by many Chinese on the internet. All claims by him need additional verification, and most importantly, need an automatic dubious --- discuss tag.

Claverhouse (talk) 00:31, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply