Talk:Antique radio

I am not sure how to fix this, Bakelite is a thermoseting plastic, which means it won't melt! BUT it is Very Brittle. It is also Opaque.

The picture at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Radio_Diora_Pionier_U2_1.jpg actually looks more like bakelite than wood, but I can't tell for sure.

Thermoplastic did sometimes melt. Many of the thermoplastics are semitransparent. cmacd 15:03, 24 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Actually it looks like, marbled polypropylene, regular plastic. Bakelite is real thick, about 3/16" thick usually or more, quite heavy and solid brown or black. The best way to repair is to use epoxy, like "JB Weld"tm 8 hour dry (Any Hardware Store) stir mixed 50/50. Because of dry fast weakness, do not try to use "JB Kwik"tm 1hr dry. "Dremel"tm out a "V" groove, on both sides of a crack, or masking tape the unfilled side of a hole, then fill. Do one side at a time. Best to overfill then sand off flat. Unless you are practice, at mixing colors into epoxy, you must later spray paint entire cabinet. There are clear epoxy’s for marine that you can mix to obtain special colors and marbling. This method works great for all plastics including Bakelite. Bakelite is extremely tough, held together with internal cloth fibers mixed in, not brittle at all. "JB Weld"tm has iron fiber hence very tough and paints well. The coefficient of expansion are quite similar in this Epoxy and Bakelite. 98.77.156.89 (talk) 05:03, 12 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

• Section on moving iron speakers split off to its own article
• References would be good
• Replace 1958 radio pic with typical pre-war homemade rad pic.
• Perhaps add a few more sylish radio pics dotted around the article
• Add (links to) sound recordings of moving iron and inductor dynamic speakers, and perhaps a 20s/30s radio
• Not sure whether to split warm up times off
• There are various related wiki articles that need reading and interacting with

Would be nice to add a recording of some early speakers/sets. Question is what could be played in such a recording without there being a copyright problem?

The acronyms PAT and HT appear in this article, but if you click on either of them, there are quite a few things each might mean, and I was not able to figure out which were correct. Note: I am American, and I suspect PAT might be a regional TLA the UK, since words like aerial are also used in the article. Maybe someone who knows what these abbreviations mean can expand them for a wider audience. Thanks! CosineKitty (talk) 02:01, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Five years later, the article is still an uncomfortable mixture of British and American English and terminology. PAT is Portable Appliance Test, a UK electrical safety test. HT is BE for B+. --Ef80 (talk) 00:40, 25 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

I agree, this article is a real mess of foreign English and unexplained acronyms and Britishims. I would fix it and clarify the grammar (which neither Oxford nor Stanford would find acceptable) but usually some twit just comes along and reverts it immediately with no explanation. "Euro-phileism" is a creeping disease on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.93.154.192 (talk) 20:15, 6 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Can anyone inform me as to the value of a British-Thompson-Houstan crystal set Model c Form a —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.71.202 (talk) 12:32, 12 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Antique radio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718040900/http://whiteradios.com/ to http://whiteradios.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:01, 15 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

According to External Links to avoid, those that should be avoided includes

Except for a link to an official page of the article's subject, one should generally avoid providing external links to:

Social networking sites (such as Myspace, Facebook, LinkedIn, and Instagram), chat or discussion forums/groups (such as Yahoo! Groups), Twitter feeds, Usenet newsgroups or email lists.

Blogs, personal web pages and most fansites (negative ones included), except those written by a recognized authority. (This exception for blogs, etc., controlled by recognized authorities is meant to be very limited; as a minimum standard, recognized authorities who are individuals always meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for people.)

So, amateur and fan how to's for repairing information and such would be included in those to avoid Graywalls (talk) 16:37, 1 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Below are Wikipedia's suggested requirements for adding external links to an article information page ...

"There are several things that should be considered when adding an external link."

• Is the site content accessible to the reader?

• Is the site content proper in the context of the article (useful, tasteful, informative, factual, etc.)?

• Is the link functioning and likely to remain functional?

Historianbuff (talk) 20:47, 2 December 2019 (UTC)Reply