User talk:Stickpen

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
English: Welcome to the Commons, Stickpen!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 02:19, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Stickpen. Please upload the cropped version on top of this one by clicking on Upload a new version of this file on the bottom of the page. Thanks --Kimse (talk) 05:28, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

could you please place some individual images of seeds in Measured seeds and also Britton & Brown, Illustrated flora of the northern states and Canada Thanks WayneRay (talk) 20:12, 13 September 2008 (UTC)WayneRay[reply]

Hi Stickpen, you nominated this image for speedy deletion because of a copyright violation. I agree with you and thank you for pointing this out. The speedy deletion was subsequently challenged and afterwards reverted by you. Please do not revert removals of speedy deletions, open a regular deletion request instead for it. I've done this now and ask you to add your comment here. Thanks and best wishes, AFBorchert (talk) 21:08, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stickpen - thanks for adding this pic, first one of the species on Commons. Any idea why it's come out so grey, almost a b/w photo? It looks like the saturation got set very low in either taking the photo or perhaps subsequent editing. I tried playing with it in photoshop to see if it might be possible to improve the colours, but it didn't work well enough to be worth uploading. Any chance you could get a better pic? (or even better yet, of one in the wild - there's some among the P. monophylla right beside SR 371 near the SR 74 junction in Riverside Co., if that's any help). - Thanks, MPF (talk) 10:33, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi. That's actually pretty close to the actual color of the tree, just a tinge duller because it was overcast and low light. I didn't edit it at all besides cropping - just let the camera do its thing. If I ever snap another specimen I'll upload it. Thanx -Stickpen (talk) 20:09, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Wonder if it is something to do with the growing conditions there? The ones I saw in the wild were greener than that (unfortunately I didn't have a digital camera then so no pics of my own). - MPF (talk) 22:11, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I appreciate your noticing my copyright violation, since I obviously missed it (I'm assuming this was uploaded to the Commons before I learned that the US-Government-owned PLANTS database contained several copyrighted images), so thank you for seeing it was removed promptly. I stand next to copyright laws and do my best to honor them, but I am capable of error.

However, I did not appreciate you taking this action without notifying the uploader (myself). It is common practice and an act of courtesy to let whomever uploaded the image know that their image has been nominated for deletion. I had a dead hotlink to the image sitting on my gallery page for three whole months before I ever realized it was missing. Please notify uploaders in the future when addressing a complaint about an image.

Thank you, Bob the Wikipedian (talk) 19:09, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Yeah I don't know who appreciates what; I myself would rather someone just delete an image I mistakenly uploaded years and years ago without bothering me about it on my talk page. It may seem like an act of courtesy to some, and an annoyance to others. Really it wasn't about you, it was about the image. If I had an issue with a photo someone took himself I'd address it, but this was just one uploaded from the USDA site. I tried to speedy it, but the moderator wasn't familiar with the copyright laws and declined, so I had to go into a long-winded explanation in the deletion review - sorry if it was embarrassing. Didn't want to make it a further issue by griping at you on your talk page. It's really not a big deal. -Stickpen (talk) 21:45, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Stickpen!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 02:35, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The name of this plant is incorrect. The name Eugenia nitens is a synonym for Ixora nitens, which is not anything similar to your plant. It looks like it could an Eugenia or similar. Was the plant an Australian native? There is a Syzygium nitens from New Caledonia. I change it's category and description to unknown Eugenia. epibase (talk) 19:01, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

US Forest Service photos

[edit]

I think theres a problem with your uploads to Category:PD US USDA FS. Example: File:Lewisialeana.jpg appears not to be a USDA photo as claimed. The image is from http://www.fs.fed.us/wildflowers/communities/serpentines/center/endemics_gallery.shtml, images there are from CallPhotos as corectly noted below the gallery, this one is from http://calphotos.berkeley.edu/cgi/img_query?query_src=photos_index&enlarge=0000+0000+0602+0175 (hope that link is stable), its mirrored and retouched but it is not a public domain photograph. Thats only a random example, the same applies to most of your uploads to Category:PD US USDA FS and maybe other users uploads too. How to proceede? --Martin H. (talk) 22:42, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed the name on your image to: File:Oreocereus doelzianus subsp. sericatus.jpg as the original name has never been published, as far as I can check. The present name Oreocereus doelzianus subsp. sericatus was given in 2002 for a species known as Morawetzia sericata which fit the plant in your image. Uleli (talk) 16:15, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pinus quadrifolia pic

[edit]

Nice one thanks! Much better colour balance this time ;-) MPF (talk) 23:23, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rosa cultivars

[edit]

I just found your user-page, as I saw that you created the remaining alphabetic 'Rosa cultivars' - categories...
I'm glad to see that my idea to split the 'Rosa cultivar categories' was taken up
but while reading through your page I had to follow the link to your pictures - and I hope it's ok if I correct some of the rosa-links...
--Anna reg (talk) 19:14, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, sorry to have to tell you about this, but the sign was wrong. It was actually a known problem at RSABG; the original L. excubitus that was there had died and some of the wildflowers took over the area. This was near Fay's Wildflower Meadow, right? It's actually a picture of L. microcarpus, an annual wildflower. I'm going to sub in a picture of L. excubitus from my collection for the wiki page, but I thought you'd like to know. --Clickie (talk) 04:16, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dcoetzee (talk) 07:39, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Wknight94 talk 15:28, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Purple fritillary

[edit]

[1] This picture is upside-down. Fritillaries hang on their stalks like bells. If you look at the long spindly leaves that are growing from the stalk of the plant, you will see immediately that this is the case. Could you please upload it the right way up? 110.33.108.25 00:24, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Stickpen

I have fixed some issues and added categories to your image. You shouldn't tag flickreview for images which aren't come from Flickr. Best regards--Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 06:38, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Balsamorhizacareyana.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 18:39, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

US Forest Service

[edit]

I see you have been uploading several US Forest Service images and attaching the copyright template {{PD-USGov}} when there is a specific tag available {{PD-USGov-USFS}}. If it is not available during upload process you should edit the image details after upload and replace the copyright licence. I also notice that a Flickr warning notice is attached to some images. You can always remove that when the source clearly indicates it did not come from Flickr. I have seen this on some other people's upload but don't know why it happens. Good luck. Ww2censor (talk) 17:03, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eremophilaracemosa.jpg

[edit]

Hi Stickpen

just a courtesy message to let you know that your image File:Eremophilaracemosa.jpg is being used in Cheryll Williams' Medicinal Plants in Australia, Vol 4 - The Australian Apothecary

rgds Tony Young aka Ringpicker (talk) 01:32, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 10:44, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads from researchlearningcenter.com

[edit]

Hi Stickpen; According to the website, researchlearningcenter.com, photographs should be attributed to "Anthony Valois and the National Park Service". Unfortunately, this notice is easy to overlook. But, if you upload more fine photographs from this site, it would be kind to attribute them as Mr. Valois requests.[2][3] Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 22:12, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Forest Service use of photos

[edit]

I am working with the Forest Service at the Spring Mountains NRA on their new interpretive centre in Kyle Canyon that aims to help visitors better understand the interconnected ecosystems of the Spring Mountains, and the role they play as stewards of this special place.

We came across wonderful your photo rosa woodsii var. ultramontane on Creative Commons and would like to incorporate it into the interpretive exhibits. I would just like to confirm your CC license that this is free for the Forest Service to use in their exhibits and that it should be attributed to "Stickpen".

We are very grateful for your contribution to this project and hope that your image will help to inspire visitors to take a closer look at the nature around them. Please contact me at kdaley@aldrichpears.com Thank you

File:Rhododendronminus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

rbrausse (talk) 12:24, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Glandularia pulchella.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

rbrausse (talk) 12:26, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

[edit]
File:Carcharodonmegalodon-model.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 15:34, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Melaleuca wilsonii

[edit]

Hello Stickpen,

Australian here! Thank you very much for your beautiful images of Melaleuca wilsonii. I am writing Wikipedia pages about Melaleuca species (mostly Australian plants) and your two images help to make the Melaleuca wilsonii page one of the best I've done. It is difficult to explain "decussate" in words or to describe the stamen bundles or deciduous petals without images. I hope you like the way I've used your photos.

All the best to you from Down Under.

Gderrin (talk) 23:24, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And also:


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jarekt (talk) 13:34, 4 June 2015 (UTC) Jarekt (talk) 13:34, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

These great pics link to pages at researchlearningcenter.org — which seems to be defunct, and replaced by smmflowers.org. Can the links be updates, hopefully without having to edit each individually? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dstrauch (talk • contribs) 23:08, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Photographer's Barnstar
Hi! My name is Cristina Guzmán and I am working as academic support in the Mexican CITES Scientific Authority, CONABIO. I know it’s weird to contact you via WikiLove, but it was the only way I found, Wikimedia is not very helpful at offering a way to contact other users, I apologize for this. We are interested in your photography of Simalia amethystina*. Where can I send you an email? Or if you prefer, please write to ac-cites@conabio.gob.mx so we can give you all the details.

Happy new year!

I have used one of your photos

[edit]

Hello Stickpen!

I have used a photo of Girella nigricans in my free software educational proyect "Animalandia" (https://animalandia.educa.madrid.org)

You can see directly in the follow link:

https://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/imagen.php?id=55032

If you wish, you can send me (via fernando.lison at educa.madrid.org) some letters or/and a photo for your "contributor profile" in Animalandia:

https://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/autor.php?nombre=Stickpen

I want show to my students (and so everybody) that Animalandia is make for "real person", and I can tell them about "generosity", "share" and other similar words that we use very few at this time...

This is my "contributor profile" and others, for example:

https://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/autor.php?nombre=Fernando%20Lis%F3n%20Mart%EDn

https://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/autor.php?nombre=Carmen%20Jim%E9nez

https://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/autor.php?nombre=David%20P%E9rez

https://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/autor.php?nombre=Steve%20Garvie%20%28Rainbirder%29

In the future, I use more of your photos, I sure!

Thank you for the licence and, of course, for your splendid photos!!

Regards!

Fernando Lisón, from Spain --Fernando.lison (talk) 12:53, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]