User talk:Rama/Archive 12

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Uzbin valley ambush-map 2.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Uzbin valley ambush-map 3.svg
• File:Uzbin7b-fr.png
• File:Uzbin8b-fr.png
• File:Uzbin8b.png
• File:Uzbin9.png
• File:Uzbin9b.png

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Louvres-antiquites-egyptiennes-img 2708.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 06:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Rama,

je me permets de me tourner vers toi pour résoudre un problème ; le compte École des chartes (compte de l'École nationale des chartes, tenu par le gérant du site enc-sorbonne.fr) s'est malencontreusement retrouvé bloqué, justement pour un problème de nom : pourrais-tu faire quelque chose ? Merci. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 16:56, 24 December 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Bonjour,

je vais demander à l'administrateur qui s'est occupé de la question s'il peut me renseigner. De votre côté, vous serait-il possible d'envoyer un mail à l'adresse permissions-commons@wikimedia.org depuis une adresse officielle, de façon à ce que nous puissions confirmer que le compte est bien géré par l'ENC ? Je vous tiens au courant des développements.

Bonne fêtes ! Rama (talk) 19:09, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir Rama ; je ne suis pas le gestionnaire du compte (juste un péon de WP fr., on s'est croisés sur IRC il me semble), et je ne peux donc rien faire. Je me suis permis de me tourner vers vous parce qu'une série de photos téléversées par l'École a été proposée à la suppression, et que je trouverais normal que le CM puisse y riposter. Si vous voulez, je leur envoie un courriel en leur indiquant la marche à suivre ; à moins que vous ne vouliez le faire.

Bonnes fêtes aussi !! Et merci de l'aide. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 19:41, 25 December 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Si vous avez leur mail sous la main, ça serait probablement plus simple. Merci beaucoup ! Rama (talk) 19:46, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Simple : « Envoyer un courriel à l'utilisateur », dans la colonne Outils :). Nomen ad hoc (talk) 20:02, 25 December 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Renseignements pris, il semble que certains au moins voient d'un mauvais œil les sites institutionnels uniques, et préfèreraient que chaque personne impliquée gère un compte (par exemple Jean Dupond pourrait avoir un compte École des chartes-Jean ou École des chartes-Dupond). Si l'équipe de l'ENC crée ces comptes et en comfirme le caractère officiel par l'OTRS, il ne devrait pas y avoir de problème.

Bonne année 2017 ! Rama (talk) 18:53, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rama. Gros problème avec le compte École des chartes, désormais bloqué. L'utilisateur n'a jamais fourni aucune preuve qu'il était "compte officiel", missionné par son institution. Les affirmations de Nomen ad hoc ("on s'est croisés sur IRC il me semble") ne valent rien comme preuve d'identité. Il était facile pour {u|École des chartes}} de confirmer sa mission officielle par OTRS, l'utilisateur ne l'a pas fait.

L'utilisateur École des chartes a déposé de nombreuses photos. Ces photos (dont j'ai demandé la suppression, après vérification) sont en ligne sur le site de l'école des Chartes, sous ©, toutes créditées. Pour plusieurs photos, École des chartes avait crédité sur commons comme auteur "École des chartes", ce qui est une erreur grossière (l'école n'est pas auteur).

Quand le nom des photographes était crédité sur les dépôts, rien ne prouvait que les photographes avaient donné leurs autorisation pour le dépôt sous licence commenciale/œuvres dérivées.

Il était facile d'envoyer les autorisations OTRS pour les photographes, l'utilisateur École des chartesne l'a pas fait. Ces dépôts n'étaient pas propres.

J'ai demandé la suppression des photos car rien ne garantissait que les photographes avaient donné leurs autorisations. La totalité de mes demandes de suppression a été acceptée… sauf les dernières, suite aux argumentations improbables de Nomen ad hoc.

Il ne s'agit pas de "riposter" à des demandes farfelues, il s'agit de respecter le droit des auteurs photographes.

Cordialement --Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 03:26, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PS. Je pense qu'il serait préférable de masquer ce résumé de modification fait par Nomen ad hoc https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Chateaubriand92&action=history

Commons doit respecter l'anonymat, et rien n'autorise à divulger une identité, surtout en le faisant d'une manière vicieuse dans le résumé de modification (je vous précise que Nomen ad hoc pratique souvent les révélations d'identité sur les différents projets).

Bonjour,

Merci pour l'attention aux questions de droits d'auteur. Effectivement si les images importées l'ont été à tort, il est bon de les supprimer, et s'il s'avère ultérieurement que l'ENC est effectivement à l'origine de ces images, il sera possible de clarifier la situation une fois de nouveaux comptes créés et confirmés par OTRS.

Pour ce qui est du masquage, l'utilisateur en question a lui-même révélé cette information par ailleurs, aussi ne suis-je par en mesure de masquer la modification en question. Cela se ferait si Chateaubriand92 demandait la suppression de l'information, naturellement.

Merci pour votre travail sur ces questions complexes, mes meilleurs vœux pour 2017, et bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 10:57, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Affiche Qu arrive t il a la peche-IMG 9656.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Affiche Qu arrive t il a la peche-IMG 9656.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 21:48, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Rama, je suis à la recherche d'une jolie photo du bâtiment Genopode de l'Université de Lausanne (p.ex. avec vue sur le lac). Idéalement une photo prise au printemps ou en été (surtout sans neige...). Est-ce que tu en aurais une dans tes archives? Ou y passerais-tu suffisamment près pour en prendre une dans les semaines qui viennent ? Cordialement, --Beat Estermann (talk) 09:23, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dans les archives je mne pense pas, mais c'est effectivement dans mon rayon d'action. Je vais regarder ce que je peux faire et le cas échéant tu me fais des commentaires sur ce que j'aurai produit et on itère jusqu'à ce que tu aies ce que tu veux (Inch'Allah pour la météo). Je te tiens au courant. Bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 10:26, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Je t'en remercie ! Tu pourras me contacter par mail: beat.estermannbfh.ch, car je risque de ne pas suivre de près tous les mouvements sur ta page de discussion ! Cordialement, --Beat Estermann (talk) 10:31, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

C'est noté, je te tiens au courant par ce biais. Bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 10:44, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Would love to use this photo in commercial work.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lamashtu_plaque_9167.jpg

Am I required to pay you in order to sell work containing this photo?

Thanks,

ieatyams09@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ebpinegar (talk • contribs) 20:23, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

You are free to use the image, modified or not, for any purpose including commercial, as long as you mention the licence and the author. Best regards,

Rama (talk) 10:06, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour
Pourriez-vous m'expliquer les raisons qui vous ont conduit à retirer ce cliché ? Si vous pouviez le faire sur ma PDD française, je vous en serais reconnaissant. Merci. --RF sesquipedalia verba (talk) 06:43, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

si vous parlez de File:Ellen Ternan.gif, elle est listée comme manquant de sources sur votre page de discussion de Commons depuis le 6 janvier 2012. L'auteur renseigné est "inconnu", elle n'a pas de date, et la source est renseignée est "Wikipedia ('en)". Il n'y a rien qui permette d'établir qu'elle soit dans le domaine public parce que son auteur serait mort depuis plus de 100 ans.

Bonne continuation (je copie ce message sur votre page de discussion sur fr:). Rama (talk) 10:02, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arlette Laguiller mp3h9252.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is good enough for QI, in my opinion: Although the left side of her face (viewer's right) is not as sharp as the right side (a) that's OK and (b) capturing that expression and the angle of her head makes this a very good portrait. I checked fr.wikipedia, and there's no article about the Hortefeux law, so it would help viewers if that law could be very briefly described in the file description. -- Ikan Kekek 02:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rama,

Est-ce bien toi qui a photographié l'edit-a-thon ce samedi? Si oui, tout d'abord un grand merci pour ta présence et ton soutien. De même, j'ai pensé qu'on pourrait poster quelques unes des images ci-dessous https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projet:Art%2BF%C3%A9minisme/2017/Lausanne/Atelier#Photos Qu'est-ce que tu en penses? Je me réjouis de voir tout ça!

Au plaisir, --Yayahval (talk) 08:44, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

Oui, c'est bien moi. Merci à toi pour cet événement, c'est non seulement agréable de travailler dans l'enthousiasme, mais important pour Wikipédia d'avoir du nouvelles têtes — surtout pensantes comme samedi. Je développe les photos et je te dis dès qu'elles sont disponibles. A bientôt ! Rama (talk) 10:51, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voilà j'ai tout publié sur Category:ArtAndFeminism 2017/Lausanne. N'hésite pas à piocher dedans, ou au contraire à me dire s'il vaudrait mieux effacer une de ces photos. Bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 16:42, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai l'impression que tu ne peux pas me lire sur twitter... alors cadeau : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ifugao_sculpture_Louvre_70-1999-4-1.jpg

--Chaoborus (talk) 15:28, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, bien joué ! Merci, et il faut régler ce regrettable état de fait sur Twitter. Merci encore ! Rama (talk) 15:42, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kléber-Marius Bar-img 3140.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, je vois ton nom comme téléchargeur, est-ce que par hasard tu te souviens de la source de ces fichiers?

File:Namban-01.jpg

File:Namban-02.jpg

File:Namban-03.jpg

File:Namban-04.jpg

File:Namban-05.jpg

File:Namban-06.jpg

File:Namban-07.jpg

File:Namban-08.jpg

File:Namban-09.jpg

File:Namban-10.jpg

File:Namban-11.jpg

File:Namban-12.jpg

File:Namban-13.jpg

File:Namban-14.jpg

File:Namban-15.jpg

File:Namban-16.jpg

File:Namban-17.jpg

• Merci, Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:48, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Je suis désolé, j'ai complètement oublié. Ça devrait être bon quoi qu'il en soit, mais c'est vrai que ce serait plus sérieux s'il y avait une source. Rama (talk) 20:10, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• ok je les ai taguées avec {{Unknown}} pour les sortir de la très encombrée Category:Images without source. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 07:27, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:French presidential election-Morges CH-IMG 7540a.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:10, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:French presidential election-Morges CH-IMG 7540.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:11, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:French presidential election-Morges CH-IMG 7541.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:19, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Artemide Tolomeo (17005011227).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

 

Speravir 03:15, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is industrial design, like a car. Rama (talk) 08:01, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:French presidential elections 2007 Paris Place dItalie 12 candidates.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 18:27, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When this says Place de Nations, I figured that means the UN Headquarters in Geneva, but... it's got a French CC license, which makes me think it was taken in France. So I guess I'm just a bit confused. TimothyJosephWood 16:16, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Place des Nations is in Geneva; I chose the licence to inherit from the French legal framework, as opposed to the US one, but this is not connected to where the images were taken. Rama (talk) 22:35, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed your excellent pictures of a hominin, many thanks these are very helpful. The cast is of Skhul 5 (see Google images). It would appear, however, as if the museum information is outdated. It was found not in modern Palestine but in British Mandatory Palestine in the early 1930s in what is now Israel. Although considered a Neanderthal at the time, it is today classified as an early anatomically modern human, Homo sapiens (see Skhul and Qafzeh hominins#Skhul). Cheers, Nicolas Perrault III (talk) 12:54, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the erudite comment, I have updated the description accordingly. Cheers! Rama (talk) 14:20, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Demonstration against Chechen LGBT persecutions-IMG 8236.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 06:36, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kumano-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 17:28, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rama, I have opened a discussion for deletion of Category:Tricycle à vapeur De Dion-Bouton-Trépardoux Musée des Arts et Métiers (not yours), as it contains the same vehicle as in your Category:Dion Bouton and Trepardoux steam tricycle-CnAM 16387, and I wanted to let you know. I am not very experienced in commons, so I hope I didn't make an error.--Chief tin cloud (talk) 11:31, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I noticed the category:Lunar meteorite-MGL 90980 and I'm a bit confused. "MGL 90980" is not the name of a meteorite. As you can see here the official name for it is "Dar al Gani 400" or "DaG 400". Perhaps "MGL 90980" is the inventory number for that specific fragment at the Musée cantonal de géologie de Lausanne. For that reason I believe that we could delete category:Lunar meteorite-MGL 90980 and just keep category:Dar al Gani 400. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 17:38, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

"MGL 90980" is definitly an inventory number for the fragment, as you say. I as not aware of Category:Dar al Gani 400. I would suggest making category:Lunar meteorite-MGL 90980 a sub-category of category:Dar al Gani 400, what do you think?

Thank you for noticing this! Rama (talk) 17:58, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Salut !

Je me suis permis d'inverser les positions du Temeraire et du victory dans la description faite sur le tableau de Crépin. Cette modification m'a mis a puce à l'oreille, puis quand on regarde attentivement le tableau et les positions respectives des navires comme racontées par Guérin ou par le capitaine Lucas, ça m'a l'air plus plausible. Qu'en penses-tu ?

Merci, Gonzolito (talk) 11:07, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ça m'a l'air très plausible en effet, vu les positions de la ligne franco-espagnole et des divisions britanniques. Aussi, le navire de gauche a nettement les marquages du Victory actuel (qui reproduisent ceux de Traflagar), ce qui n'est pas le cas de celui de droite. Bonne pioche, je pense.

Bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 16:07, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

Apparemment, il y aurait une erreur concernant cette image File:Leon Morel-Fatio-Emmanuel Barcet-IMG 8930.JPG que tu as chargé sur Commons, Cf le message laissé par une wikipedienne du Musée de la Marine ici. D'autre part, il y aurait également un problème de droit qui pourrait ce terminer par une demande de suppression de la photo. Peux-tu voir tout cela? Merci, bon week-end CaptainHaddock (talk) 15:18, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, et merci pour la notification.

Je ne suis pas sûr de comprendre, c'est un portrait qui représente Apollinaire Lebas et non Morel-Fatio ?

Pour ce qui est de la question de droit, si les informations sur les auteurs sont correctes, l'image est dans le domaine public et sa reproduction est soit dans le domaine public (version US), soit sous la licence que l'auteur de la reproduction lui donne (version Droit français).

Rama (talk) 15:37, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Salut!

Avant d'insérer le template dans les catégories du MSR, je voulais te signaler un petit problème d'internationalisation. Si tu regardes, par exemple, Category:Musée_Saint-Raymond,_Ra_11 en une langue différente du français - prenons l'italien :) - il y a certaines erreurs.

L'institution n'est pas reconnue, en effet Musée Saint-Raymond est traduit différemment dans les autres langues; il faudrait récupérer l'item qui point à la page de l'institution: Institution:Musée Saint-Raymond dans wikidata. Un problème similaire apparait pour le nom de l'auteur, qui peut être traduit différemment et donc le Creator peut ne pas exister, comme dans le cas de Creator:Anonimo (qui correspond à Creator:Anonymous).

Quand Wikidata ne trouve pas de titre (nil), il donne un message d'erreur. Voici mon premier debugging! À + --Ruthven (msg) 13:14, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merci beaucoup pour ces retours! Je débugue ça dès que j'ai une minute à moi. N'hésite pas à me signaler tout autre problème du même genre, ça m'est très utile ! Rama (talk) 14:22, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Salut! J'ai commencé à corriger ce problème multi-langues en allant chercher directement l'item institution (tu verras un petit changement dans ton code):

   {{Institution:{{#property:P1612|from= {{#invoke:Wikidata|formatStatementsE|item={{{1}}}|property=p195|displayformat=raw}} }} }}

plutôt que

   {{Institution:{{#property:P1612|from={{{1}}} }} }}

J'espère de ne pas avoir fait des dégâts. Ciao! --Ruthven (msg) 16:20, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Splendide, Bravo !

Je suis très à la bourre ces jours-ci et c'est difficile de dégager du temps pour débugger ce template, grâce à toi le problème est presque résolu tout seul !

Je vais essayer cette syntaxe aussi pour les dimensions, qui buggent parfois en français, et il faut que je comprenne pourquoi il ne prend plus le titre du Q-Item comme titre par défaut pour l'objet.

Encore bravo et mille mercis pour ton aide ! Rama (talk) 17:39, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pour le titre, pourquoi tu n'utilises pas directement {{Label | <item>}}? --Ruthven (msg) 10:49, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Si Titre est renseigné comme propriété il prend ça, mais sinon il default sur Label. Ça ne marche plus depuis quelques semaines et je n'ai pas eu le temps de regarder pourquoi pas. Rama (talk) 11:55, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Salut,

Je suis nul en Lua (du coup, je dis peut-être n'importe quoi, n'hésite pas à me le dire si c'est le cas :D ) mais j'ai l'impression qu'il y a quelque chose qui ne va pas dans les lignes 199 à 204 (fonction getDimensionValue) de Module:RamaTesting (en tout cas, que je ne comprends pas). Déjà, la variable locale work n'a pas une nom très explicite, pourquoi ne pas juste prendre value ? Ensuite je ne vois pas à quoi sert la ligne 201 (déjà j'ai du mal à suivre cette fonction split - notamment le [1] dont je comprends que tu veux la première partie mais je n'ai pas l'impression que la fonction le prenne en compte - et sauf erreur les dimensions ne contiennent pas d'espace, si ? serait-ce un séparateur de millier ?)

Sinon, sur un autre point, je remarque que juste en dessous (fonction getDimensionUnit) tu as mis à la main les symboles des unités (if unit == "centimetre" or unit == "centimeter" then return "cm") alors que ces symboles sont déjà stockés dans Wikidata (via P558, et en plusieurs systèmes d'écritures en plus ! pour le début tu peux ne garder que l'alphabet latin). Cela serait surtout utile, si tu tombes sur une unité exotique (genre Category:Invader - PA 168 où la taille est indiqué en « carreau » sur Wikidata).

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 19:10, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Salut,

pour dimensions, j'extrais les valeurs et les unités pour les passer dans un template de Commons qui les met en page joliment (avec la conversion en unités impériales pour nos amis de l'Empire). Le split, c'était en réaction au formattage dans certaines langues — effectivement la façon propre de faire serait de récupérer la valeur WD en formattage par défaut ou en formattage anglais, mais j'ai du mal à le faire pour le moment parce que tout ça est un empilement de bricolages.

Comme tu le dis très justement, il conviendrait de regarder le template actuel avec un air pincé, retourner au tableau noir pour définir clairement ce qu'on veut dans différents cas, et tout réécrire proprement [1]. On trouve un moment pour en discuter à Berlin ?

A bientôt ! Rama (talk) 08:09, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Artix Kreiger (talk) 17:21, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, @Artix Kreiger: , for the notification. The matter has been dealt accordingly. Cheers! Rama (talk) 18:54, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Compartmented seal-AO 26190 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Zoupan (talk) 01:53, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Perelachaise-Desproges-p1000354.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:33, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:WikidataCon 2017-IMG 2083.JPG

And also:

• File:WikidataCon 2017-IMG 2084.JPG
• File:WikidataCon 2017-IMG 3670.JPG

Yours sincerely, Fæ (talk) 19:26, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Com:Overwriting existing files probably should be waved here. I would suggest that we revert and upload separately. We probably should be uploading without the picture frame too.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:43, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bolero-Maurice Ravel-Philadelphia Orchestra-Eugene Ormandy-1957.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

RJaguar3 (talk) 03:32, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, "Wiki Science Competition" 2017 has started It is a world event. The upload phase in Asian, American and European countries without juries ends on December 15th. Here you can find more details. This is a manually inserted message for commons users with knowledge of the English language who are also globally active or who have uploaded images related to the competition's themes (science buildings, microscopic images, scientists, wildlife...). #WSC2017 #WikiScience #WikiScience2017 Wiki Science Competition

--Alexmar983 (talk) 05:57, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

			* Happy Holidays 2018, Rama! *
			Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:11, 25 December 2017 (UTC)   [reply]

Bonjour Rama, est-ce que tu peux supprimer les fichiers File:Ana Isabel Alos Lopez.png et File:Miguel Angel Paniagua Nunez.png s'il te plaît ? C'est moi qui les avait uploadés mais je viens de voir que le fichier dont elles sont issues n'est pas libre. --FructidorAn3 (talk) 19:00, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hum, je ne pense pas que ça pose un problème : un extrait d'un fichier non libre peut être libre ou non-copyrightable (c'est comme ça qu'on peut produire des livres en utilisant des images libres dedans). Comme les signatures ne sont pas considérées comme copyrightables sur Commons, je crois que tu peux te tranquilliser.

Bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 19:21, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merci de ta réponse Rama, mais si cela vient de la demande de celui qui a importé les fichiers (moi en l'espèce) peux-tu quand même réaliser la suppression s'il te plaît ? --FructidorAn3 (talk) 20:02, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Les fichiers ont été effacés par User:JuTa pendant la nuit (sinon je l'aurais fait, bien sûr). Bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 10:39, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merci, bonnes fêtes de fin d'année ;) --FructidorAn3 (talk) 12:30, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Pour info. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 14:06, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest renaming File:Webley-Mk-IV-p1030102.jpg to File:Webley-Mk-VI-p1030102.jpg. --ghouston (talk) 07:07, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, well spotted! Rama (talk) 13:14, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

The early prototype for multilingual caption support is available for testing. More information on how to sign up to test is on Commons. Thanks, happy editing to you. - Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:06, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rama,
Many of your contributions just appeared in Commons:Database reports/Self-categorized categories.
For example Category:Terrestrial globe-MHS 753.
I fear a simple bug in User:Rama/Catdef.
Cheers Liné1 (talk) 14:50, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sounds quite likely to be a snag in {{Rama/Catdef}}, but it could be somewhere upstream: I see that Category:Reduction compass-MHS 1939, which uses {{Artwork}}, exhibits the same behaviour. I'll look into this, thank you for the notification and good continuation! Rama (talk) 14:54, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

On n'arrive pas à faire l'edit demandé ici: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Institution:Archives_cantonales_vaudoises

"This Institution template is relying on Wikidata page, which is missing Commons Institution page (P1612) property. Please click Commons to Wikidata QuickStatements.svg icon above to add it." Tu arrives à comprendre de quoi il s'agit? Je suis avec Eloi des Archives cantonales vaudoises

--Flor WMCH (talk) 14:50, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oui, c'est réglé :) (il fallait faire ceci: [2])

Bonne continuation à vous ! Rama (talk) 14:56, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

Wikimédia France souhaite profiter du 2 millionième article de la Wikipédia francophone, pour mieux faire connaître l'envers du décor. Administrateur, arbitre, wikifourmis, labélisateur, etc sont méconnus du grand public. Nous nous sommes inspirés du projet Faces of Open Source [1] pour faire connaître une vingtaine de fonctions du wikipédien. A la place du portrait que nous n'avons pas le temps de réalisé, nous allons faire faire des dessins représentant la fonction. Pour chaque fonction sélectionné, nous cherchons un ou une wikipédienne disposé à répondre à quelques questions :

   - Qu'est ce qu'un photographe sur Wikipédia ?
   - Comment fais tu ?
   - Pourquoi aimes/participes tu au mouvement Wikimédia ?

Nous avons pensé que tu accepterais participer en répondant en tant que photographe.

Qu'en dis tu ?

Dans l'attente de ta réponse, je te souhaite une belle journée !

Amélie — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 193.248.54.109 (talk) 08:20, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

oui, où puis-je t'envoyer la réponse ?

Bonne journée ! Rama (talk) 10:51, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, tu peux lui envoyer ta réponse à amelie.cabonwikimedia.fr. -Sylvain Boissel WMFr (talk) 12:52, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you check the licensing of these files? They are currently naming either you or Ad Wilschut as the author, and you as the copyright holder / license granter. Thanks. File:The Javelins 1.jpg, File:The Javelins 1964-1-1.PNG, File:The Javelins 1965.png. --ghouston (talk) 09:48, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actually they were originally uploaded by Rama~nlwiki at Dutch Wikipedia, I guess you took over the account name. --ghouston (talk) 09:52, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

yes, I am afraid that your Rama is in another castle ^^

I was unaware of this band and that I had a homonyme on wp-nl. Seeing them, there are good chances that this images were mistakenly uploaded by a use unaware of copyright rules.

Thank you for your vigilance, and cheers! Rama (talk) 11:32, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I just nominated them for deletion. --ghouston (talk) 05:31, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Could you look at Category:Prasiolite quartz-MCG 90942 and the files inside. I was thinking about doing similar conversions to reduce the use of {{Object photo}} and {{Category definition: Object}} templates and transclusion of categories. I was thinking about starting with files using User:Rama/Catdef. What do you think about such conversion? --Jarekt (talk) 03:18, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that decouples the description of the images from that of the category, excellent!

Do feel free to experiment on files that I have uploaded and that use User:Rama/Catdef, that was pretty much the point (well, aside from provided the images; there are a few people who have been using User:Rama/Catdef back from the time when it was the only Wikidata-powered template I knew of, for these people it might be less unsettling to convert their templates when we have a stable version, so they don't fear they are doing something wrong with their images).

By the way, do let me know if I can help in any way. I don't write you messages everything I feel grateful for your work, because it would clog your talk page, but be sure the sentiment it there — I was especially delighted when I saw the "Reference URL" field appear.

Best wishes and good continuation! Rama (talk) 07:42, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Also, your new solution does not have the bug in which photographs are put in the category of the object AND all of the category to which the object belongs, so we can dispense with the "onlyinclude" tags, which is much more elegant. Rama (talk) 08:32, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I changed all uses of User:Rama/Catdef to {tl|{Art Photo}} templates when used in files and replaced them with {{Wikidata Infobox}} when used in Categories. Some categories still need to be added as sitelinks to wikidata but I will fix then on Monday. --Jarekt (talk) 02:11, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Splendid ,thank you very much! Have a great week-end. Rama (talk) 08:36, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rama. Any idea why seven of your uploads from 2016 are in that category? --Leyo 22:17, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, the parent category had an incorrect description because it was a case that a conversion bot was not designed for but it should now be all sorted out. Thank you! Rama (talk) 07:04, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:49KashinClassDestroyerMediterraneanJan1970.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

廣九直通車 (talk) 05:30, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:49KashinClassDestroyerMediterraneanJan1970.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 06:42, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Rama, je viens de voir cet avis que tu as reçu; si tu veux envoyer l'échange que tu as eu avec l'auteur à OTRS (permissions-itwikimedia.org), je me charge de le valider le plus tôt possible. À + --Ruthven (msg) 07:53, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah oui, merci, c'est effet comme ça qu'on fait. Ce doit être la chaleur ^^;; Merci ! Rama (talk) 10:43, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

--Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:26, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

A slide presentation of the draft requirements for depicts statements on file pages is up on Commons. Please visit this page on Commons to review the slides and discuss the draft. Thank you, see you on the talk page. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:20, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Salut !

Merci pour tes explications samedi au musée ! Je suis en train de revoir et trier mes photos et j'ai déjà pu créer quelques jolies entrées sur le Wiktionnaire : olpé, kyathos, wikt:lékanis, trozzella (absent de wp.fr), exaleiptron (absent de wp.fr). J'aurai quelques 77 photos à téléverser, mais je vais d'abord les envoyer à Flor, comme convenu. J'espère que tu as eu de belles prises de ton côté aussi Noé (talk) 14:06, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bravo ! C'était vraiment intéressant de voir la perspective wiktionariste sur la visite, ça renforce ma conviction qu'on travaille mieux à cheval sur plusieurs projets. Bonne continuation et tenons-nous au courant pour une suite éventuelle ! Rama (talk) 15:44, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Rama, pourquoi supprimer toutes ces informations dans votre dernière modif ? Bien cordialement --Faqscl (talk) 17:53, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, les informations ne sont pas supprimées, elles ont été copiées sur Wikidata, d'où elles sont maintenant importées automatiquement. Cela a une foule d'avantages, notamment des outils de recherche infiniment plus puissants et le multilinguisme automatique. Bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 19:25, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

En fait, je ne suis pas très familier avec wikidata ! Merci pour ta réponse ! --Faqscl (talk) 13:49, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rama,

While reading this article - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fight_Between_Carnival_and_Lent - I noticed your contribution, The figure of Carnival (detail), has not rendered the colour properly.

The article says, "The man behind the barrel is dressed in yellow, which is connected with deceit, and he is followed by a female figure who is carrying on her head a table with bread and waffles on it. "

But in your image, he is dressed in white.

Even in the full painting on the page, he is in yellow. Could you rectify it?

Regards, Shakescube. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shakescube (talk • contribs) 02:31, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Fascinating! I am colour-blind, and I have been known occasionally creative rendering of important paintings, so put it charitably. In this case, I have just changed the white balance of the image to alleviate the problem somewhat, but I fear that some areas of the image have had their colours blown to the extent that information has been lost. Do not hesitate to make a crop from a correct, high-resolution image of the whole painting to replace my image should it be needed.

Thank you again and congratulations for spotting this snag, and good continuation! Rama (talk) 06:52, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is a conflict on the page Mirror-MG 15014-IMG 9556-gradient.jpg /Commons, between the date : "IIIe siècle av. J.-C. " and the period : "Six Dynasties" (220-589 ). Is it possible to solve the problem ? Thank you for your work. (Ismoon (talk) 22:30, 10 October 2018 (UTC)).[reply]

Bonjour,

J'ai n'ai pas trouvé de cartel en ligne pour cette pièce et j'ai détruit les archives de ce relevé photographique, mais d'après le style du mirroir il s'agit probablement d'une erreur d'ère, j'ai donc modifié en "3ème siècle de notre ère". N'hésite pas à me dire si des informations plus spécifiques émergent. Bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 08:58, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Our translation company is considering to use your photo https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Grand_Port_mg6971.jpg in the cover of the translation of Alexandre Dumas's book Georges to Finnish. We will include the following info in the title pages of the book

Name date of the painting and the painter Photograph by Rama, Wikimedia Commons, Cc-by-sa-2.0-fr

Is that acceptable? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.149.193.50 (talk) 12:48, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

Yes it is! Thank you for enquiring and my very best wishes in your endeavour!

Rama (talk) 17:18, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:PIEM,Futuroscop.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:PIEM,Futuroscop.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Titlutin (talk) 19:44, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jonas Kress-IMG 2325.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

77.14.75.14 13:20, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

per my policy to deleted portraits as a courtesy to the subject if they request it, I have deleted the image in question.

Best regards, Rama (talk) 13:38, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Durres airport supplies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 10:37, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]