User talk:Lyokoï
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:32, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Rangeons Groix
[edit]Salut ! Je te remercie pour le rangement que tu opères sur les catégories de Groix. Je suis peu au fait des règles de catégorisation de commons (suis encore nouveau sur le projet), donc je te fais confiance, néanmoins il y a une discontinuité dans la nomination des catégories pour l'île, le lieu est soit appellé "Groix" soit "Groix island". Il faudrait qu'on tranche, non ? Rapidement dans l'idéal, d'ailleurs, parce que j'ai encore plusieurs centaines de photos à ajouter (J'en ai pris plus de 550 durant mes vacances sur l'île, toutes rangées en dossiers) qui n'attendent que d'être propulsées sur commons. Je vais donc encore créer un certain nombre de catégories... Merci d'avance pour ta réponse ! --Lyokoï (talk) 11:04, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
- Bonjour,
- Je dois avouer que je ne connais pas toutes les règles de catégorisation. Mais j'essaye de me débrouiller au mieux. Personnellement, je reconnais que, à part les personnes, je ne crée une catégorie qu'à partir de 2 photos. Par exemple, j'ai peur que la Category:Cinemas in Groix Island ne reste emplie que de la seule photo qui y existe déjà. D'ailleurs, s'il n'existe qu'un seul cinéma, il vaudrait mieux renommer en Category:Cinéma de Groix. De même, s'il n'existe qu'un lavoir, un phare, un château... il est inutile de créer les catégories Wash houses in, lighthouses in, Castles in... De manière générale aussi, c'est l'anglais qui est la langue de base (d'où le Groix island). Pour Groix, le côté compliqué, c'est qu'on a deux entités qui se nomment de la même façon et que l'on confond allégrement : une entité géographique, l'île de Groix, et un entité administrative, la commune de Groix (officiellement nommé Groix, tout court). D'où la confusion entre Groix island, l'île, et Groix, la commune. Les deux appellations peuvent se valoir.
- La redirection Groix island → Groix date de mars 2015. Mais les catégories infra sont potentiellement plus anciennes. Aussi, je te rejoins, il faudrait mener le travail de renommage à fond et changer les Groix island en Groix. Maintenant, ce n'est pas trop) grave de rajouter des photos sur les catégories telles qu'elles sont. Ou libre à toi de te lancer dans les renommages, via le Template:Category redirect. A disposition pour en reparler. Cordialement,--Fab5669 (talk) 08:50, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Sources
[edit]Hi Lyokoï : You need to indicate the source of the images. I suspect you have taken all these pictures yourself, if so, please go back and edit all of them to read {{own}} where it says "source". Please also include a source on all new uploads! Thanks! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:12, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Ellin Beltz: I'm very sorry for this error, I forgot to put this parameters in my upload... I'll make the change during the day. Thanks for your message ! --Lyokoï (talk) 06:19, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for your actions!! I have archived all those warning templates as your files are now fine. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:57, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Source
[edit]Salut Lyokoï,
Si c'est toi qui a pris ces photos, tu dois mettre {{own work}}
dans le paramètre |source =
du modèle {{Information}}.
Bien à toi, Thibaut120094 (talk) 21:46, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Thibaut120094: J'ai complètement oublié le paramètre !! Je vais faire la correction dans la journée, merci de l'info ! ;) --Lyokoï (talk) 06:20, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Plop
[edit]Category:Wiki takes MBA Lyon 2018-05-13 — Ltrlg (talk), 13:12, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
File:Claude Dalbanne - Les Parques - MBA Lyon.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Otourly (talk) 14:45, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Voir Category:Cylinder seals in the Musée des Beaux-Arts de Lyon
Références | Photos | site MBA |
E 306 | [1] | |
E 342-1 | ? | [2] |
E 342-2 | ? | [3] |
E 342-3 | ? | [4] |
E 342-4 | ? | [5] |
E 342-5 | ? | [6] |
E 342-6 | ? | [7] |
E 342-7 | ? | [8] |
E 342-10 | [9] | |
E 342-12 | [10] | |
E 342-14 | [11] | |
E 342-16 | [12] | |
E 342-17 | [13] | |
E 342-19 | [14] | |
E 342-24 | [15] | |
E 342-25 | [16] | |
E 342-26 | [17] | |
E 342-27 | [18] | |
E 342-28 | [19] | |
E 408-13 | [20] |
Otourly (talk) 18:21, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
File:2015-09-28 eclipse de Lune surexposée.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
B dash (talk) 07:16, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Your renaming requests
[edit]Hello Lyokoï, I really have no problem to work at your renaming requests, but in my opinion you are so active here, that you can get the filemover-rights here. You can try it, if you want to. Kind regards, --Brackenheim (talk) 12:24, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Brackenheim: It's sound like a good idea. I will work a lot on category:Lingua Libre pronunciation. Thanks for this proposition. ;) Lyokoï (talk) 12:33, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Welcome, Dear Filemover!
[edit]
Hi Lyokoï, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:
- Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
- Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
- Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.
Cheers! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:09, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Hedwig in Washington: Thanks !!! ;D --Lyokoï (talk) 10:04, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Mise en place de la 1er fusée Véronique.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Mise en place de la 1er fusée Véronique.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Mise en place de la 1er fusée Véronique.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Thibaut (talk) 18:54, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019
[edit]Bonjour,
Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8310 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !
Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !
Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.
Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.
P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !
Bonne journée,
Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Carte langue d'oil
[edit]Bonjour Lyokoï. Pourriez-vous détailler votre carte des langues d'oil concernant le poitevin-saintongeais pour être en accord avec la source que vous mentionnez. L'article en français mentionne 2 variantes distinctes (poitevin au nord - Poitou - et saintongeais au sud - Charentes -). La définition du poitevin-saintongeais n'a jamais fait l'unanimité et fait toujours l'objet de polémiques. Merci d'avance. Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 06:46, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Jack ma: Bonjour, comme indiquée dans la description je me suis basée sur cette carte que j'ai vérifiée notamment grâce aux travaux d'Eric Nowak. Quand à votre affirmation que le rassemblement des deux groupes de parler n'a jamais fait l'unanimité, je vous conjure de lire entièrement l'article WP que vous me donnez car il dit tout l'inverse (dès l'introduction : Le terme recouvre l'ensemble linguistique d’entre Loire et Gironde, réunissant parlers poitevin et saintongeais, dont l'unité relative a été mise en évidence dès le début du XIXe siècle). La polémique est récente (2007) et j'ai opté pour ce qui fait consensus dans les publications sur le sujet. Lyokoï (talk) 21:00, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
- La polémique de 2007 ne date que du temps où "on" a forcé (Erik Nowak et université de Poitiers) "saintongais" et "poitevin" a ne former qu'une seule langue, malgré les protestations des Charentais. Il n'y a pas eu de consensus. Dans des .png et .jpg des années 2000, la zone "poitevin-saintongeais" a été différenciée par 2 teintes légèrement différentes, pour refléter ce désaccord, voir par exemple Langues d'oïl 2.svg ou Langues de la France.svg. Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 05:06, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Jack ma: Monsieur, je vous conjure de ne pas confondre arguments politiques et arguments scientifiques. Ma carte ne se repose que sur ces derniers qui montrent depuis la fin du XIXe siècle que ces deux groupes de langages sont différents culturellement (comme pour le lyonnais et le forézien) mais sont linguistiquement trop proche pour être séparé (pour le lyonnais et le forézien c'est le francoprovençal). Ce désaccord est purement politique, compréhensible (personne n'aime se voir invisibiliser dans un groupe plus important) et légitime. Je ne nie à aucun moment de différence entre ces deux sous-groupes, bien qu'eux-mêmes soient encore sous-constitués de parler d'espace plus restreint. D'ailleurs le nom de l'ensemble est clairement consensuel en faisant apparaître les deux variétés, on aurait pu l'appeler "haut-aquitain", "L'oïl du Sud" ou que sais-je encore. Mais quoi qu'il en soit de la considération politique et des revendications des locuteurs et locuteurs de ces parlers. Cela fait bien longtemps qu'on sait que c'est la même langue. Si voulez me les faire séparer dans ma carte, apportez-moi des arguments scientifiques. La dialectométrie quantitative et structurelle a confirmé depuis 2003 l'unité de cet ensemble. Lyokoï (talk) 10:47, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- "Cela fait bien longtemps qu'on sait que c'est la même langue", non justement. Mais oui en même temps, car tout n'est que dialectes (ou "patois") de "la" langue d'oil, le français, de même que "gascon", "limousin", etc. ne sont que des dialectes de "la" langue d'oc (y compris "catalan", mais ce n'est pas reconnu). Bref, tout cela est très subjectif (flou, variable, contradictoire...). Tant pis pour ma demande, je respecte le point de vue officiel. Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 10:56, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Jack ma: Monsieur, je vous conjure de ne pas confondre arguments politiques et arguments scientifiques. Ma carte ne se repose que sur ces derniers qui montrent depuis la fin du XIXe siècle que ces deux groupes de langages sont différents culturellement (comme pour le lyonnais et le forézien) mais sont linguistiquement trop proche pour être séparé (pour le lyonnais et le forézien c'est le francoprovençal). Ce désaccord est purement politique, compréhensible (personne n'aime se voir invisibiliser dans un groupe plus important) et légitime. Je ne nie à aucun moment de différence entre ces deux sous-groupes, bien qu'eux-mêmes soient encore sous-constitués de parler d'espace plus restreint. D'ailleurs le nom de l'ensemble est clairement consensuel en faisant apparaître les deux variétés, on aurait pu l'appeler "haut-aquitain", "L'oïl du Sud" ou que sais-je encore. Mais quoi qu'il en soit de la considération politique et des revendications des locuteurs et locuteurs de ces parlers. Cela fait bien longtemps qu'on sait que c'est la même langue. Si voulez me les faire séparer dans ma carte, apportez-moi des arguments scientifiques. La dialectométrie quantitative et structurelle a confirmé depuis 2003 l'unité de cet ensemble. Lyokoï (talk) 10:47, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- La polémique de 2007 ne date que du temps où "on" a forcé (Erik Nowak et université de Poitiers) "saintongais" et "poitevin" a ne former qu'une seule langue, malgré les protestations des Charentais. Il n'y a pas eu de consensus. Dans des .png et .jpg des années 2000, la zone "poitevin-saintongeais" a été différenciée par 2 teintes légèrement différentes, pour refléter ce désaccord, voir par exemple Langues d'oïl 2.svg ou Langues de la France.svg. Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 05:06, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Important message for file movers
[edit]A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect
user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
- To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
- To perform file name swaps.
- When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect
user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Planche 48. — Projet d’installation d’un service central des postes, télégraphes et téléphones à Lyon à l’emplacement de l’ancien Hôtel-Dieu.jpg
[edit]File:Planche 48. — Projet d’installation d’un service central des postes, télégraphes et téléphones à Lyon à l’emplacement de l’ancien Hôtel-Dieu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gnrc (talk) 10:48, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Planche 49. — Bureau des téléphones Vaudrey, plans.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gnrc (talk) 10:51, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
demande renommage
[edit]pour les images suivantes :
Merci — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gnrc (talk • contribs) 17:44, 22 November 2019 (UTC) et aussi :
--Gnrc (talk) 18:00, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Gnrc: Mais du coup, c’est quoi son nouveau nom ? Lyokoï (talk) 21:50, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Un autre contributeur l'a déjà renommé avant toi (File:Villa 7 rue de la Mignonne - Lyon (7).jpg), merci tout de même pour les autres ! --Gnrc (talk) 22:22, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Planche 50. — Bureau des téléphones Vaudrey, plans.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gnrc (talk) 15:02, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
File:Planche 49. — Bureau des téléphones Vaudrey, plans.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gnrc (talk) 15:04, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
File:Planche 46. — Projet d’installation d’un service central des postes, télégraphes et téléphones à Lyon à l’emplacement de l’ancien Hôtel-Dieu (old).jpg
[edit]File:Planche 46. — Projet d’installation d’un service central des postes, télégraphes et téléphones à Lyon à l’emplacement de l’ancien Hôtel-Dieu (old).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gnrc (talk) 15:09, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey
[edit]Dear Lyokoï,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.
You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.
Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.
Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:22, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !
[edit]Bonjour,
Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !
Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.
Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.
P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Portrait équestre de Madame de Saint-Baslemont par Claude Deruet, 1646.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Portrait équestre de Madame de Saint-Baslemont par Claude Deruet, 1646.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Portrait équestre de Madame de Saint-Baslemont par Claude Deruet, 1646.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:05, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Reminder
[edit]Hi Lyokoï. I noticed that you've made malformed deletion requests. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:20, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Jeff G. Hello ! Thank you for your message ! I will use « Speedydelete » for now when I see a bad naming for a category. Lyokoï (talk) 22:11, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:MBA Lyon Exposition Claude - Coupes (coupe 2003.1.973).jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:MBA Lyon Exposition Claude - Coupes (coupe 2003.1.973).jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:MBA Lyon Exposition Claude - Coupes (coupe 2003.1.973).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 02:22, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Proposition de découpage des langues d'oïl pour enregistrement dans le Wiktionnaire.png
[edit]Bonjour Lyokoï, Je me suis permis de remettre la zone du Croissant sur ta carte du découpages des langues d'oil car tu l'avais précédemment revert. Pour cette zone je me suis appuyé sur les travaux du groupe de recherche actuel du CNRS sur les parlers du Croissant et notamment les travaux de Philippe Boula de Mareüil. Ce dernier avec d'autres chercheurs du CNRS et de ce groupe ont créé l'Atlas sonore des langues régionales sur lequel je me suis appuyé (CNRS, 2020) : https://atlas.limsi.fr/?tab=cro (Zoom sur le Croissant) et https://atlas.limsi.fr/ (échelle de la France entière). Pour ces derniers il s'agit vraiment d'un espace intermédiaire qui tient et de l'un et de l'autre, je pense donc qu'il a sa place sur la carte, au moins pour souligner cette appartenance au monde d'oïl même si ce n'est pas une langue d'oïl à part entière et totalement. Ce pourquoi je l'avais mis en teinte marron et non en teinte de vert comme les autres. J'ai donc sourcé davantage avec le lien cité plus haut et d'autres articles. Après peut être veux-tu conserver la forme initiale de ta carte ? Je peux le comprendre. Mais je pense qu'il est vraiment bénéfique d'insérer le Croissant. D'autant plus qu'on a avec l'Atlas sonore du CNRS une référence en la matière qui permet d'avoir une cartographie très nette. Qu'en penses-tu ? Cordialement, --Vida Nova (talk) 15:53, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Vida Nova Cette carte sert au Wiktionnaire, c’est dans le titre. Donc non, il faut réverter. Ce n’est pas moi qui l’ai mise dans Wikipédia, ce n’était pas son but et je pense qu’elle a certaines erreurs. Par contre, je suis contre, mettre le croissant si on ne met pas l’occitan. Quelle est l’intérêt de mettre une zone de transition sans mettre les zones avec lesquelles elle fait la transition, c’est illogique pour moi. N’hésite pas à reprendre ma carte, à la renommer et la modifier à ta guise, mais laisse ma carte de travail tranquille, s’il te plait. Lyokoï (talk) 16:44, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Merci de cette réponse très claire. Je n'y toucherai plus (je ne pensai pas à mal). --Vida Nova (talk) 17:00, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Vida Nova Je ne le prend pas mal, je me doute bien que tu ne pensais pas à mal. Il n’y pas de soucis. ;) Lyokoï (talk) 17:07, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Merci de cette réponse très claire. Je n'y toucherai plus (je ne pensai pas à mal). --Vida Nova (talk) 17:00, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Arthur Halbert d'Angers, Le nouveau dictionnaire complet du jargon de l'argot, ou Le langage des voleurs dévoilé, 1849.pdf
[edit]Hi can you check for a specfic artist, engraver or illustrator credit, and update the file description page accordingly? {{Book}} is intended to be used for entire documents such as books or manuscripts, and it's use on a single image is misleading. A template like {{Artwork}} would be more appropriate. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:24, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
- @ShakespeareFan00 Hello, I don’t understand what you want… The files that you link IS a book with 36 pages… Lyokoï (talk) 17:08, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- Apologies. I must have been tired when I posted this. Competence is mandatory and I failed :( ShakespeareFan00 (talk) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:15, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- @ShakespeareFan00 No problem. ;) Lyokoï (talk) 17:29, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- Apologies. I must have been tired when I posted this. Competence is mandatory and I failed :( ShakespeareFan00 (talk) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:15, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C
[edit]- You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,
RamzyM (WMF) 23:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 16 October 2024 (UTC)