User talk:Jensens

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to the Commons, Jensens!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्द��� | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)






Kart

[edit]

Heisann, ser du har lastet opp en rekke kart. Hvilke data er disse basert på? Btd (talk) 00:13, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Det er brukt data fra kartdatabasen N2000 fra Statens kartverk. I tillegg legger jeg inn egne data. Kartene er gjort i ArcMap. Jensens (talk) 07:26, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Antar da at N2000 er lisensiert fritt av Kartverket? Har du redigerbare "originaler" slik at andre kan gjøre endringer i kartene? Da tenker jeg både på mulige uenigheter om plassering/stedsnavn og direkte feil. En kjapp titt på rogalandskartet viser at Hommersåk og Kopervik er feilplassert, og at Sandnes mangler. Ganske grove feil. Ellers virker det tilfeldig hvilke kommuner, øyer, flyplasser, etc. som navngis og hva som får store bokstaver. Btd (talk) 21:20, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Det er ikke fri tilgang til dataene, men her er det brukt lisensiert vare. Det er ubegrensede redigeringsmuligheter i kartene, og jeg er bare glad for tilbakemeldinger. Skal forbedre Rogaland snart. Jensens (talk) 10:20, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Är verkligen kartor fria från upphovsrätt om de baseras på N2000 från Statens kartverk? Det låter osannolikt. Var finns det beskrivet? Om det stämmer, så skulle det vara en förebild för Sverige och andra länder. --LA2 (talk) 23:09, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Virksomheter som er parter i Norge digitalt [1] har fri tilgang til alle data under denne portalen. Jensens (talk) 23:21, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Och är du det? Jag vet ju inte vem du är. Och har du rättighet att ge dessa kartorna vidare som "public domain"? Det låter för bra för att vara sant, så det vore fint att få något fastare bevis på det. --LA2 (talk) 23:27, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Og uansett, så hadde det vært greit om kartene kunne bli eksportert til SVG-formatet i stedet for JPEG-filer. ArcMap skal kunne gjøre dette, men det er mulig du må inn med en ekstra plugin for dette. Stigmj (talk) 23:31, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Første forsøk på svg-kart falt ikke helt heldig ut: [2] Jensens (talk) 23:45, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Jodå, om man tittar på möjligheten att förstora SVG-bilden så är det ett stort framsteg. --LA2 (talk) 02:54, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Jeg synes kartet ser like mislykket ut i forstørret versjon. Men hvis en etter hvert kan få like god kartografisk kontroll over svg-filer som en kan med bildefiler som etterbehandles i Photoshop, så gjerne for meg. Jeg får prøve meg fram. Jensens (talk) 07:55, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Om detta stämmer, så måste OpenStreetMap för Norge få en helt ny inriktning. --LA2 (talk) 23:36, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Det får andre ta seg av. Jeg jobber med den programvaren jeg kan, altså ArcMap. Jensens (talk) 23:41, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Disse kartdataene er IKKE frie, og kan IKKE importeres i OpenStreetMap (OSM). N5000-serien fra Statens kartverk KAN importeres i OSM, men er i for lav oppløsning til å være nyttige der. N2000 og andre serier er kommersielle. Jeg antar at de som kjøper lisensierte kartdata fra Statens kartverk har en viss tillatelse til å publisere bitmapkart, særlig i så lav kvalitet som det som er gjort her. Hva lisensen på disse kartene vil bli er usikkert, og hvilke regler no: og commons har for lisenser på opplastede bilder vet jeg heller ikke, men å regne seg tilbake til vektordata og legge disse til i kartgrunnlaget for OSM er utvilsomt både et lisensbrudd og et brudd på åndsverksloven. Om WP finner ut at disse kartene er greie så hadde det vært kjekt med en notis på dem om at kartdataene som sådan ikke er frie. Einarr (talk) 14:33, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Partnere i Norge Digitalt (kommuner og everk, for eksempel) har kun tilgang til disse dataene for internt brukk. Det er ganske klart at dette er utenfor lisensen og ulovlig bruk. -- Gustav 12 desember 2008

Da lar jeg dette ligge så lenge, og avventer en endelig avklaring av forholdet. Jensens (talk) 15:13, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Vi kan ju inte veta vilka specialvillkor Jensens har. Men vi kan inte utgå ifrån att han (hon?) har rätt att frisläppa de här kartorna, utan vi bör kräva att han styrker detta på något sätt. Bevisbördan ligger på Jensens. --LA2 (talk) 03:11, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Selv har jeg fått tilgang til dataene som student ved en av de undervisningsinstitusjonene som er part i Norge Digitalt. Om partenes bruk av dataene står det bl.a.: «SKs (Statens Kartverks) og partenes bruk av monopolinformasjon [1] skal skje på ikke-kommersiell basis.» («[1] Begrepet monopolinformasjon benyttes om de primære kartdataseriene som etableres av Statens kartverk»). Se ellers utfyllende informasjon på [Norge Digitalt]. Jeg kjenner for lite til hvilken lisensiering som kreves for stoff som lastes opp på Wikimedia Commons, men jeg skulle ønske at noen med administratorfunksjon kunne vurdere bruken av data under Norge Digitalt, og ev. henvende seg i Norge Digitalt-sekretariatet for en avklaring. Jensens (talk) 11:48, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Men ikke-kommersiell basis er da ikke bra nok for Wikimedia Commons (eller andre Wikipedia/Wikimedia-prosjekter for den saks skyld)? For at vi skal kunne ha slike kart må de kunne brukes til ethvert formål, og alle skal ha rett til å gjøre modifikasjoner i dem. Det ser jo ikke ut til at det er tilfelle her. --Kjetil_r 14:06, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Jeg har ikke sett en god klarering hos Norge digitalt eller Statens kartverk for hvordan disse dataene kan brukes av partnerne (mulig jeg gikk glipp av noe i lenkene gitt her?), eller fått overbevisende sitater her. Dessuten holder ikke indirekte klarering, og nå har også en administrator uttalt seg. Hvis det er slik at det er begrensninger (f.eks. ikke-kommersielt), er det sannsynligvis ikke godt nok. Det er egentlig en sak mellom opplaster og rettighetshaver, så mitt forslag er at Jensen ber om en klargjøring fra kartverket eller andre med eierskap til informasjonen i Norge digitalt om hva det er lov å gjøre med informasjonen. I mellomtiden bør nok kartene slettes etter en viss tid. Btd (talk) 00:09, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hei, kan ikke se at det har skjedd "noen videre utvikling her". Dersom vi ikke har fått ny info om eksplisitt tillatelse må kartene nomineres til sletting slik at vi kan få en endelig avklaring. Ser du har gjort et stort og godt arbeid her, men vi kan ikke beholde kart lisensiert som PD dersom det bryter oppphavsretten. Vennlig hilsen Finn Rindahl (talk) 15:00, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Map files nominated for deletion

[edit]
Your Norway map files have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hade inte denna teknik varit bättre för sånt här i stället för magic wand och gaussian blur? 88.148.220.245 15:29, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 00:45, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 00:51, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Urtehagen Domkirkeodden.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 22:27, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kart Østmarka - 1928

[edit]

Har du en digital kopi av hele dette kartbladet? Skulle ev. gjerne hatt en kopi. Lars Rogstad (talk) 00:13, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


In other languages (translate this)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  italiano  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  日本語  +/−

Please use SVG
Please use SVG
Thank you for uploading Finnmark county map.jpg! Did you know that Wikimedia Commons recommends the SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) format for certain types of images? Scalable Vector Graphics are designed to look appropriate at any scale, and SVG images are easier to modify and translate, helping Wikimedia to distribute knowledge to all of the world. A lot of modern programs support SVG export. If you encountered problems or have questions, don't hesitate to ask me, a member of the Graphic Lab, or the Graphics village pump. Uploading images in SVG format isn't mandatory, but it would help. (To avoid any misunderstandings, please don't just put raster images into an SVG container as embedded raster.) Thanks, and happy editing!

Seagull123 (talk) 16:35, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Tettstedskart.svg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tettstedskart.svg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, Castillo blanco (talk) 13:55, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

[edit]
anne bakker
Mrwikicloud1968 (talk) 23:16, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]