User talk:JMvanDijk

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, JMvanDijk!

Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文（台灣）‎ | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- 18:41, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

---

Hello, JMvanDijk!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:03, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Image:Oranje Frederik Hendrik personal before prince alt.png was uncategorized on 7 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:03, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Oranje Frederik Hendrik personal before prince.png was uncategorized on 7 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:03, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Orange Principality Map .jpg was uncategorized on 14 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Blason Wapen Personal Arms of Willem Alexander of the Netherlands Orange and Nassau.jpg was uncategorized on 14 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Blason Nassau-LaLecq Beverweert Ouwerkerk Odijk.PNG was uncategorized on 24 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:De Witt of Dordrecht Arms Wapen.PNG was uncategorized on 8 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:02, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:United Provinces Government.tif was uncategorized on 15 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:08, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Willem VI van Oranje Sovereine Vorst 1814 - 1815.PNG was uncategorized on 18 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:43, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Nassau William Chevalier de la Lecq.jpg was uncategorized on 8 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:15, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Nassau Lodewijk van den Lek Lord of Beverweert.jpg was uncategorized on 8 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:15, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Arms of Johan Willem Friso as Prince of Orange.JPG was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:26, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Arms of Maurice or Nassau Prince of Orange.PNG was uncategorized on 11 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:12, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Arms Maurice of Nassau prince of Orange.JPG was uncategorized on 11 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:12, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Willem II wapen voor 1648.PNG was uncategorized on 5 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:12, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Blason Wapen Personal Arms of Willem Alexander of the Netherlands Orange and Nassau.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Blason Wapen Personal Arms of Willem Alexander of the Netherlands Orange and Nassau.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:09, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Blason Wapen Personal Arms of Willem Alexander of the Netherlands Orange and Nassau.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Blason Wapen Personal Arms of Willem Alexander of the Netherlands Orange and Nassau.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 11:37, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear JMvanDijk: The Coat of Arms of the Zorreguieta-family in the Royal Arms is different: -> http://www.koninklijkhuis.nl/encyclopedie/monarchie/wapens/wapens-van-leden-van-het-koninklijk-huis --> http://www.leibbrandt.com/leibbrandt_archive/wappen_coat_of_arms/wapen_willem+maxima.jpg /-> http://www.ovkoudekerk.nl/maximama.html (for example, the missing two black animals are wolfs, the trees cypresses (-> http://www.heraldik-wiki.de/index.php/Zypresse_(Heraldik) ), the ground something like water.) Would You change it, please? Yours faithfully, LeoDavid (talk) 13:25, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PS:Look at this -> http://heraldicaargentina.blogspot.de/2013/04/escudo-de-la-reina-maxima-de-los-paises.html Yours faithfully, LeoDavid (talk) 12:07, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I put another question on File_talk:Maxima_Netherlands_Oranje-Nassau_Personal_Arms.PNG, I hope you can take a look at that as well. Perhaps in this case it makes sense to rename the file to something about the CoA of the princesses, and upload a new version of this under the Maxima-filename? The shape is of course a detail, but it would be nice to have it correct. Effeietsanders (talk) 08:58, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the updates! As you both noticed, I took the description off the Dutch Royal House website. The resolution isn't very good there, and the all the description says is "a castle with 3 portals". So, I will take a look. I can't promise fast turn around as I do this as stress relief from my day job. ;-). JMvanDijk (talk)

I guess it's a translation error. Dutch "torens" means "towers", not "portals". But German "Tore" means "portals". The original Dutch text of the royal decree: Besluit van 25 januari 2002, houdende verlening van wapen en onderscheidingsvlag aan Hare Koninklijke Hoogheid Prinses Máxima: "In een hartschild van goud, komende uit een golvende schildvoet van azuur, een gekanteelde (= crenellated) burcht (= castle), waarop drie gekanteelde (= crenellated) torens, de middelste hoger dan de andere (= the mean tower is a shade higher), het geheel van keel, en vergezeld van twee toegewende wolven (= wolfs) van sabel, elk gaande over een uitgerukte cipres (= cypresses) van natuurlijke kleur." (this presentation of the CoA is for Maxima, but the substance is as well as in the presentation for her royal children: Besluit van 21 november 2003 tot vaststelling van het wapen van kinderen die geboren mochten worden uit het huwelijk van Zijne Koninklijke Hoogheid Prins Willem-Alexander Claus George Ferdinand, Prins van Oranje, Prins der Nederlanden, Prins van Oranje-Nassau, Jonkheer van Amsberg met Hare Koninklijke Hoogheid Prinses Máxima der Nederlanden, Prinses van Oranje-Nassau, mevrouw van Amsberg). (interview with the designer of the CoA) Yours faithfully, LeoDavid (talk) 21:04, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear JMvanDijk, thank You very much, that's better! Now, only a little "point of criticism" remains: "een gekanteelde (= crenellated) burcht (= castle), waarop (= above) drie (= three) gekanteelde (= crenellated) torens (= towers), de middelste hoger dan de andere" (= the mean tower above the castle is a shade higher than the two outside-towers above the castle), if You know what I mean, but this is really a tiny detail, of course. Yours faithfully, LeoDavid (talk) 07:54, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Like this ;-) LeoDavid (talk) 14:37, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey guys, needed some stress relief yesterday, so let me know if the below works. I took the design from Mr. Bunel's website. There is some well known wiki-bug with the thumbnails, i.e. it takes a while for the thumbs to propagate around the various parts of wiki, so you might see the old one reflected in the thumb on some pages for a while. When you click on it, the new/correct version will come up though. :JMvanDijk (talk)

Thanks for the work. I think there are two improvements still possible. The first would be the towers on top of the castle, that should be three towers probably, as in the description (and see also image above). Finally, as Máxima is a married woman, she should have an oval shield & heart shield. The best 'proof' for this can be found in this digital book, page 101. The towers are less visible there. Effeietsanders (talk) 17:25, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Let me get to the 3 towers. Not sure about the oval shield: that is not really followed in Holland as stringently as in the rest of the world, esp. the Spanish speaking world. Maxima's arms on the Dutch Royal family website do not use an oval or heart shield. 207.45.43.67 sorry, that was me, I timed out. JMvanDijk (talk)

As you can see, I updated the file with the 3 small towers on top of the main tower. Give it some time to propagate around the various wikis. JMvanDijk (talk)

Hello JMvanDijk, I'd also like to chime in here. Per the blazon, the inescutcheon of the Zorreguieta family should have a wavy base ("golvende schildvoet"), and the horns are "plated argent" ("beslagen van zilver"). See also the argent/azure stripes here. Regards, De728631 (talk) 19:38, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, it looks a lot like you used some SVG templates from Commons to create your version of the arms, e.g. File:Meuble héraldique Huchet.svg. If so, you need to attribute the creators of these elements and the specific files you used. See also {{Derived from}}. De728631 (talk) 19:55, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ok, added a wavy surface. Pls wait a while while it propagates. JMvanDijk (talk)

Thank you. In the meantime, I've made an SVG version: File:Maxima Netherlands Oranje-Nassau Personal Arms.svg. De728631 (talk) 22:30, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's very much better now. Here's my try, it's less qualitative, but close to the blazon and heraldic correct. Notice: as a married woman, her shield is oval ("Als getrouwde vrouw voert zij het wapen in ovale schildvorm." -> http://www.koninklijkhuis.nl/encyclopedie/monarchie/wapens/wapens-van-leden-van-het-koninklijk-huis/ Only her royal children (today three daughters), princesses as well as maybe future princes, concerning the constitutional emancipation respective the Dutch devolution of the crown since 1983, are allowed to use the traditional triangular shape with also a triangular heartshield. And usually, the insides of the sound openings of the hunting horns are red. Have a look at this digital royal Dutch armorial: -> http://www.wapenschilder.nl/goudenleeuw/default.html this digital book (p. 101 for Queen Maxima, and p. 113 for her children, the princesses of the Netherlands), (as You can see as well: http://www.leibbrandt.com/leibbrandt_archive/wappen_coat_of_arms/wapen_willem+maxima.jpg / ). Best regards, LeoDavid (talk) 06:52, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aah, missed that sentence. I will work on an oval version....

sorry, forgot to sign that JMvanDijk (talk)

for the horn, I've seen it colored many different ways in detail. I can't find a definitive reference. JMvanDijk (talk)

without a definitive reference, I have to admit, I'm much too lazy a person to go back an change all the horns. ;-) JMvanDijk (talk)

In the end it all depends on the blazon. Anyhow, I've updated my version of the horns. Now I might go ahead and create an oval version of the shield. Hrm. De728631 (talk) 14:57, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, it depends on the blazon: "Besluit van 25 januari 2002, houdende verlening van wapen en onderscheidingsvlag aan Hare Koninklijke Hoogheid Prinses Máxima: Wij Beatrix, bij de gratie Gods, Koningin der Nederlanden, Prinses van Oranje-Nassau, enz. enz. enz.

Op de voordracht van Onze Minister-President, Minister van Algemene Zaken, gedaan mede namens Onze Ministers van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties en van Defensie, van 22 januari 2002, nr. 02M423598;

Gelezen het advies van de Hoge Raad van Adel van 17 januari 2002;

Hebben goedgevonden en verstaan:

[...] II en III in goud een jachthoorn van azuur, gesnoerd en geopend van keel, beslagen van zilver; [...]" -> with red carrying straps, red sound openings and silvern fittings, like (then) Queen Beatrix decided. Well, in my opinion the center shield should be oval, too, as seen in the digital armorial on page 101. Greetings, LeoDavid (talk) 21:42, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed and done. :) Good night, De728631 (talk) 22:50, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, updated King Willem-Alexander's personal arms with the white fittings. Will do Maxima's when I get around to making the oval version. JMvanDijk (talk)

Been very busy at work and with a new baby. Posted the oval version above on the proper pages I know of, as I did not want you to wait until I have time. JMvanDijk (talk)

Finally posted Maxima arms with white fittings. Onto the oval version. JMvanDijk (talk)

There were two princes called Frederick of the Netherlands, and so there are also two categories here at Commons. Could you please update the description of this image and indicate which of two princes these arms belonged to? De728631 (talk) 21:23, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Look in summary description of file: "English: Arms of Prince Frederick of the Netherlands (1797–1881)..." JMvanDijk (talk)

Yes, I chose to add these dates based on Simple Family Tree House of Orange 1450 -1815. De728631 (talk) 14:47, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• 
  Originally from the current coat of arms of Bruges
• 
  16th century German

I can offer a quick solution by adapting one of the above lions. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 20:54, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think this would be a nice addition. Thanks.

JMvanDijk (talk)

Any preference? Or, of course, both are possible as well, but that makes it even harder if one has to decide which one to use in what context. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 14:49, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me that the one on the left is more representative of the periods based on the sources I've seen. txs!

JMvanDijk (talk)

Lemmens, Tom (talk) 09:38, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Looks good. JMvanDijk (talk)

I'm looking to hire artists to design vector coats of arms for coadb.com. I pay $1.75 USD per arms. That’s not much, but I purchase a huge +10,000 image clipart package (called Armorial Gold) for you to use, which makes the process much faster and easier. I currently have two artists who work for me, and they have earned several thousand dollars over the last 12 months. Please contact me coadb@mail.com if you are interested.Coadb1984 (talk) 15:33, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Percy Arms quartered with Lucy.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 09:29, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Alt England Scotland.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Alt England Scotland.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 03:30, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Family Tree of House of Welf Brunswick and Hanover.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Tamfang (talk) 01:27, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lord Mayor Russell impales the City of London arms (dexter) with his family arms (sinister):

Could you create these impaled arms svp? 194.50.30.10 00:02, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How delightful to see an English coat with Scot-style cadency! —Tamfang (talk) 23:56, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not a matter of cadency, but marshalling the arms of office! 194.50.30.10 21:41, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The bordure engrailed vert probably has nothing to do with the office. —Tamfang (talk) 19:47, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JMvanDijk: resolved.

File:Prince Hendrik of Netherlands and Mecklemburg personal arms.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Quistnix (talk) 20:48, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands Personal Arms.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Quistnix (talk) 20:56, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oldenborg Stamtræ.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Tamfang (talk) 20:08, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have an English version of this [[1]] for the english wiki? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Piracy4life (talk • contribs) 14:45, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @JMvanDijk,

Thank you for creating the File:Royal Naval Gold Medal.svg, which I want to use for WP articles. Would you mind if I crop the version with the transparent background and reupload it?

Best Regards, Socius sociologicus (talk) 09:56, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

JMvanDijk (talk)No problem, just give it a different name.

File:London Central Estates.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The background is stitched together from Apple Maps, which is non-free according to their Terms of Service, subsection 1.3 ("You will not and will not permit or authorize a third party to: […] (iii) create derivative works […]") Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

 

--Rohieb (talk) 13:57, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi JMvanDijk, I think the foreground layer of the file is still valuable, and you could instead use OpenStreetMap as the map background instead (e.g. using BigMap2), which is free to use when given credit. --Rohieb (talk) 14:03, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Will do once I have time. JMvanDijk (talk) 13:27, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]