User talk:Ingo1968
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- 10:20, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 11:26, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:National Stadium in Warsaw.jpg was uncategorized on 29 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:26, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Ingo1968, hast du wirklich 1962 das Originalfoto geschossen oder nur die digitale Reproduktion davon gemacht? --Túrelio (talk) 20:28, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
- Ja, hast du richtig erkannt, es ist nur abfotografiert. Ist das ein Problem? Das Bild ist 50 Jahre alt und ich weiß nicht, wer der Urheber ist. Aber es ist jemand aus dem Umfeld meines Vaters und ihm gehört das Poster. --Ingo1968 (talk) 20:48, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
- Ja, das ist ein Problem, weil bei Fotos aus dieser Zeit bereits eine Schutzdauer von 70 Jahr p.m.a. anwendbar ist. Du müsstest also mal recherchieren, ob du den Fotografen nicht doch noch ausfindig machen und dann ihn (oder seine Nachfahren) um eine Genehmigung ersuchen kannst. Andernfalls sehe ich keine Chance. Denn "anonymes Werk" wird auf :de wegen der inhärenten Risiken nicht akzeptiert, insbesondere nicht aus dieser Zeit, da der Fotograf ja durchaus noch leben könnte. --Túrelio (talk) 20:53, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 15:28, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Hallo Ingo, ich habe deine Änderung an File:Diözesanes Zentrum St. Nikolaus 2013.JPG wieder rückgängig gemacht. Das Bild ist vom Licht her sicherlich alles andere als optimal, aber Helligkeit und Kontrast so zu verändern, dass man im Himmel überhaupt gar keine Konturen mehr sieht, halte ich nicht für sinnvoll. Zudem verfälscht es die Farben.
Du kannst deine Version selbstverständlich gerne unter neuem Namen hochladen oder einen neuen, behutsameren Anlauf wagen, aber auch dann wäre mir als Fotograf ein neuer Dateiname lieber. Viele Grüße,--Cirdan (talk) 20:27, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- Hallo, Cirdan, OK, ich kann deinen Standpunkt verstehen. Magst du vielleicht selber das Bild etwas aufhellen? Gruß, Ingo1968 (talk) 20:38, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- Ich schau mal, dass ich am Wochenende die Datei mit voller Auflösung finde und dann eine verbesserte Version drüberschreibe.--Cirdan (talk) 20:48, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 10:36, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 19:38, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Thesupermat (talk) 13:12, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, — Racconish 💬 11:33, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Quartier de la Défense 2014.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:44, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:33, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
File:Baku National Stadium 2015-06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |