User talk:HombreDHojalata/Archive 3

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:08, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Category:Community Fischeries Control Agency has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--Int21h (talk) 14:29, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:Base General Morillo.jpg

And also:

• File:Castrelo do Val SIXPAC.jpg
• File:Mosteiro de Santo Estevo de Ribas de Sil, SigPac.jpg
• File:Pazo da Pastora, Vigo.jpg
• File:Pazo de Torrecedeira SIGPAC.jpg

Yours sincerely, Jcb (talk) 18:41, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Boas, vin que melloraste moito o aspecto dos gráficos que fixera das empresas e traballadores de Pontedeume. Decateime que puxen incorrectamente "Servicios" no canto do correcto "Servizos". Poderías arranxar iso? Saúdos, --Xosé Antonio (talk) 14:22, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi, the files deleted with Category:Marcial Gómez Parejo have the licence CREATIVE COMMONS RECONOCIMIENTO-COMPARTIRIGUAL 3.0 UNPORTED (CC BY-SA 3.0) shown at the bottom of the original source. --Jmcasals (talk) 09:28, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Dear HombreDHojalata. I uploaded File:Almada Negreiros Começar FCG img 7708.jpg because I truly believed Freedom of Panorama applied to this image; I still do. I quote: "Portuguese copyright law allows the use of works permanently installed at public locations. The law explicitly mentions buildings and sculptures as examples of such works (§75(2)q). "Use" includes taking a photograph of such a work and publishing it (§68)". This applies to any work of art permanently installed at public locations, outdoors and indoors, as in this case.Manuelvbotelho (talk) 10:53, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

In ARTIGO 75º [1] (CÓDIGO DO DIREITO DE AUTOR E DOS DIREITOS CONEXOS) the Portuguese law reads: "2 — São lícitas, sem o consentimento do autor, as seguintes utilizações da obra: q) A utilização de obras, como, por exemplo, obras de arquitectura ou escultura, feitas para serem mantidas permanentemente em locais públicos". The law mentions public spaces without specifying any further; this means that in Portugal any work of art, permanently located in a public space, indoors or outdoors, is included in Freedom of Panorama.Manuelvbotelho (talk) 22:19, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

The law isn't concerned with the author's intentions. So long as a work, any work, is permanently installed in a public space the law applies. (For your information however, in the particular case of Almada Negreiro's Começar, it is well known that this very important work was specifically made to be installed in its present location and nowhere else. I worked for two consecutive months on his page in Portuguese Wikipedia and read a great deal about Almada Negreiros).Manuelvbotelho (talk) 22:41, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Best wishes.Manuelvbotelho (talk) 22:48, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Gracias a ti. :) ¡Se hace lo que se puede, hombre! Totemkin (talk) 21:51, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Ola!, onte subin á commons un ficheiro; Escudo de Padrón (oficial).png. Procede de Terras de Iria, mandeilles un correo electronico pedindo permiso e dinme que non hai ningún problema co copiright, amais agradeceronme que a subira. Penso que e unha páxina que depende dos concellos do Sar case con total seguridade e prefiren que se poña o escudo oficial.

Pero eu non sei moi ben que licencia teño que empregar para poder empregala na wikipedia. Un saúdo e grazas de antemán.--Dodro (talk) 15:51, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Ó mellor a mesma licencia que se usa neste ficheiro; Igrexa de San Xián de Laíño, Dodro.jpg

De tódolos xeitos xa lle reenviei a permissions-commons@wikimedia.org o e-mail onde me dan permiso os da oficina de turismo de padrón. A ver que acontece! Un saudo--Dodro (talk) 17:43, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Digo oficial porqué e o que usa o concello de padrón nos seus documentos oficiais. E según opinan, e cito literalmente o e-mail; "a verdade e que esta semana estivemos mirando para actualizar e correxir a información que aparece na wikipedia sobre Padrón, e un erros máis importantes é o escudo que aparece" (Alberto Rey. Oficina de Turismo de Padrón).

Porén eu o único que quero e que non borren o ficheiro que subín. Xa lles direi que manden eles persoalmente un e-mail dando permiso para empregar o escudo (oficial ou non). Un saúdo e gracias de novo--Dodro (talk) 20:38, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Si, xa sei que debería..., pero terei que poñelo nas tarefas pendentes porque iso leva bastante tempo e ando pillado. Fixen o outro porque estaba no artigo e non quedaba demasiado ben que estivera así. Tomo nota para cando teña un rato, pero se non tes un interese especial por el non sei cando o poderei cambiar. Eso si, se o precisas entón aparco as outras cousas e me poño con el, simplemente dimo. Saúdos, --Elisardojm (talk) 23:14, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Non te preocupes. Xa fas de máis. Parabéns, por certo, por todo o teu traballo. 213.179.122.111 08:00, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Grazas, pero debería ser eu o que che dera a ti os parabéns :), e por iso aproveito para felicitarte por ter o ollo sempre atento e non deixar pasar nin unha palla. Unha aperta!, --Elisardojm (talk) 23:28, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:100 escudos, Portugal, 26 de maio de 1988, Fernando Pessoa.jpg

And also:

• File:100 escudos, Portugal, 26 de maio de 1988.jpg
• File:1000 escudos, Portugal, 26 de outubro de 1982, D. Pedro V.jpg
• File:1000 escudos, Portugal, 26 de outubro de 1982.jpg
• File:20 escudos, Portugal, 4 de outubro de 1978, Gago Coutinho inicia a navegação aérea astronômica.jpg
• File:20 escudos, Portugal, 4 de outubro de 1978, Gago Coutinho.jpg

Yours sincerely, Gunnex (talk) 11:51, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello, You receive this message because we noticed your contributions relating to the Moroccan natural heritage. We would welcome you to participate in the contest Wiki Loves Earth, which aims to encourage the development of natural protected areas throughout the Wikimedia projects (mainly Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons media encyclopedia). The contest runs from 1 to 31 May 2015 and is open to all. Prizes will be awarded at the end. A question, a problem? Do not hesitate to leave a message on the discussion page of the event. See you soon, Reda benkhadra (d · c) For more details | Contact

Boas, somos a mesma persoa

Saúdos

File:Diegosj.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JuTa 22:16, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Matilde Temes Trujeda, esposa de Valentín García Escudero.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 18:19, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Matilde Temes Trujeda, esposa de Valentín García Escudero.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Green Giant (talk) 03:35, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

I note that you have changed the author and date to unknown, and the license to {{PD-old-80}} but this is incorrect because you can only use that PD tag if the author is known and they have been dead for more than 80 years. It depends on whether the photographer really is unknown and when the photo might have been published, certainly pre-1900. We could possibly use {{Anonymous-EU}} and {{PD-anon-1923}} because the file has to be free in both Spain and the USA. If you can find any more details it would help enormously because I don't want to see such an old photo deleted. Green Giant (talk) 19:49, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Dear HombreDHojalata, many thanks for the notification. I have restored that media, which was deleted yesterday by User:INeverCry, as it was and is duly licensed. Best, Apcbg (talk) 06:30, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:RETRATO DE VALENTIN GARCÍA ESCUDERO (1833-1912).JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:RETRATO DE VALENTIN GARCÍA ESCUDERO (1833-1912).JPG]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 15:50, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:RETRATO DE VALENTIN GARCÍA ESCUDERO (1833-1912).JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Stefan4 (talk) 15:50, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Grazas por revisar esa foto! :) Saúdos, --Elisardojm (talk) 00:18, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

¡Hola, HombreDHojalata! He visto que en su momento sobreescribiste esta imagen. Si bien si tiene más pixeles y más bytes y en general más... ¿contraste?, aparte de carecer de algunos manchurrones presentes en la original, creo que merece la pena conservar la primera, al menos lo que viene siendo el ojo derecho por ejemplo se ve bastante más definido. También otros detalles de la imagen. ¿Te importaría subir tu versión a un nuevo título y restaurar la original en ese archivo? Después se pueden enlazar la una con la otra a través del "other versions". En fin qué te voy a contar que no sepas a estas alturas. ¡Un saludo! Strakhov (talk) 20:07, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Vale, paréceme ben que discordes, pero permíteme que me explique. Se o escudo do club X di que o seu escudo é a cruz de Santiago con fondo vermello e branco, iso non pode ter copyright porque non ten orixinalidade, é unha simple definición, e se eu fago un escudo debuxando esas cousas non é unha obra derivada. Se o que queres dicir é que o usuario Nemigo está copiando de forma exacta os ficheiros das páxinas web dos clubs de fútbol transformándoos simplemente de formato, que non estou seguro de que este sea o caso penso que realmente non son copias exactas, entón si podería ser. Pero xa che digo que coa segunda opción tampouco estou seguro porque aínda que hai similitudes realmente non son copias exactas.

Por outra banda están os de imaxe], pero iso xa é outra cousa, que implica ó dereito mercantil pero que xa non afecta ós dereitos de autor que é o único que nos incumbe en Commons e na wiki. Saúdos, --Elisardojm (talk) 23:39, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

No que concordamos é que o fútbol levanta paixóns, iso é indiscutible :) É seguro que isto xa se tentou facer outras veces pero tamén é verdade que os coñecementos que a comunidade vai adquirindo de dereitos de autor van aumentando e cada vez sabemos mellor que cousas teñen dereitos e que cousas non. Sabes ben que ás veces hai cousas asumidas que non se revisan, pero que ó final descúbrese que eran incorrectas, cando foron aplicadas durante anos.

Para min un brasón non chega ó limiar de orixinalidade porque dicir, por exemplo, "leva a cruz de Santiago sobre un escudo con dúas Cs" iso non xera dereitos de autor. Outra cousa é a imaxe que interprete un deseñador ou un pintor baseándose nese brasón. Despois, neste tema, temos tamén os dereitos comerciais e de explotación de marca, pero iso non afecta á wiki, porque eses non son dereitos de autor, son outros dereitos que non chocan cos que hai que vixiar aquí, sabes que en Commons hai centos e centos de logos de empresas que se manteñen aquí porque son moi simples e non chegan ó limiar de orixinalidade e, pola contra, ese logos son marcas rexistradas e teñen outras limitacións de uso que non teñen que ver cos dereitos de autor e por iso poden estar aquí.

E que conste que neste caso o que menos me move é a paixón futboleira que non teño a máis mínima! :), o único que me move é a paixón pola wiki e polos contidos libres :) Imos seguir o caso a ver como remata, agora vou engadir algo disto que che acabo de poñer arriba na páxina do borrado, a ver se vale para algo ou non hai nada que facer :) Saúdos, --Elisardojm (talk) 17:04, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Ah, non perdoa, non consultei porque agora xa non teño acceso a el, xa non estou na asociación por problemas varios con eles. Comenteillo a Discasto, a ver se pode aclarar algo o tema. Saúdos, --Elisardojm (talk) 20:15, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Erraste al solicitar el borrado rápido del archivo File:Submarino S01.jpg ... resumiendo:

• - Todós los archivos de la web http://www.losbarcosdeeugenio.com se publican bajo licencia creative commons totalmente compatible con la utilizada en commons
• Para subir un archivo, es necesario enviarselo al administrador, que verifica personalmente que el archivo es propiedad de quien lo remite. (leer las condiciones de uso de la página, la licencia, etc, etc, etc)

Así pues, te solicito que retires la plantilla tu que la pusiste.

Un saludo Takashi kurita (talk) 13:14, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Boas, esta imaxe pode facerse? Segundo entendo a liberdade de panorama só aplica ó exterior dos edificios, nin sequera cando son públicos, polo que penso que non podería estar en Commons, non? Se estou no certo habería que borrar algunhas imaxes máis do artigo da estación de Vigo-Urzáiz... Saúdos, --Elisardojm (talk) 10:04, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Creo que hago mías las palabras de Alan. ¿Qué tal todo? Rastrojo _(D•ES) 21:18, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Ola.

Son fotografías extraídas de Commons. Debería poñelo na descrición?

Grazas. --Piquita (talk) 19:33, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Xa cambiei o que me comentaches na imaxe do Portal de Galicia. Poderías comprobar se está todo correcto? Grazas! Piquita (talk) 21:49, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Entendo que o escudo do SEG non chega ó limiar de orixinalidade, está feito con letras e formas simples, de feito tiña pensado recortalo e poñelo no artigo...

As fotos de todocolección non teñen dereitos de autor porque os orixinais non o teñen xa que non chegan ó limiar de orixinalidade, que eles lle poñan unha marca de auga non lles outorga dereitos de autor. Creo que lles quitei a marca de auga a todas, se queda algunha avisa e quítolla.

A foto do mestre Florentino púxenlle o dos 80 anos porque atopei que a foto File:Florentino López Cuevillas.jpg tiña esa licenza e pensei que como o autor é descoñecido era axeitada, non? Saúdos, --Elisardojm (talk) 22:29, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Home, é normal, cada un ten puntos de vista diferentes, non somos a mesma persoa :)

• Tes razón, será mellor borrar o ficheiro co escudo do SEG.
• Discordo no das fotos de todocolección, son fotos de obxectos de obxectos planos sen dereitos de autor polo que facerlles unha foto non achega nasa de creatividade, se fose unha foto dunha escultura a cousa cambiaría xa que ó ser unha obra en 3D si se interpreta que a fotografía ten creatividade propia xa que pode facerse dende miles de planos diferentes.
• Si que que gusta moito o dos médicos forenses :) E entón se a foto File:Florentino López Cuevillas.jpg é de alguén de menos de 49 anos, entón File:Mestre-florentino-2.jpg é de alguén aínda menor porque ten máis pelo! :) Saúdos, --Elisardojm (talk) 22:34, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I've made a new comment on the Term of protection for Spain: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:World_copyright_terms.svg --Martsniez (talk) 10:37, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello. Art. 26 Spanish Intellectual Property Law (Real Decreto Legislativo 1/1996) establish duration of copyright protection for the length of the author's life + 70 years. This is also harmonised by the Copyright Term of Protection Directive 2006/116/EC, article 1. Different is the duration of moral rights in Spain, see arts. 15 Spanish IP Law.

Hola. En España la duración de los derechos de explotación (o copyright) es la vida del autor + 70 años (art. 26 de la Ley de Propiedad Intelenctual, Real Decreto Legislativo 1/1996). Dicha duración está harmonizada por la Directiva 2006/116/EC, art. 1. En cuanto a los derechos morales de los autores, la duración de los mismos puede diferir, ver art. 15 del Real Decreto Legislativo 1/1996.

Qué tal todo? Espero que muy bien. Parece ser que el mapa muestra la situación actual para obras nuevas. Y esas obras tienen 70 años, lo de los 80 años y 2057 al final es algo que sabemos los cuatro frikis de siempre que estamos al loro de estas wikimovidas. Yo no le darías más vueltas. Un abrazo y me alegra saber de ti. Rastrojo _(D•ES) 11:35, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

la verdad es que no te entiendo, hice un buen articulo y publique unas fotos para que mcha gente se enterara de un edificio tan bonito, quizas el unico articulo de esto en ingles de todo el internet y de bibliotecas y archivos y todo, este edificio fue muy historico, la unica forma que la gente se interese por verlo es viendo primero la imagen, y tu lo quieres borrar, y mira que no soy español, pero me interese mucho por la arquitectura española y gallega fuee viendo estas cosas del pasado, y asi como yo podrian haber millones de personas y ser un precedente para articulos de esta arquitectura fuera de wikipedia, quizas no, por que tu los quieres borrar--Vvven (talk) 23:59, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

ha trasladado el nombre de la categoría de la University of Santiago de Compostela. Siempre he admirado sus contribuciones, pero ese traslado no me parece acertado, porque lo correcto es que, si es posible, los nombres vayan en inglés. ¿Por qué no lo deshace usted mismo?Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 11:16, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Hola, HDH, ese es un asunto espinoso, especialmente porque mucha gente cree que "dado que la papeleta está [aparentemente] en el dominio público, entonces el logo también lo está". Eso, como bien señalas, no es cierto. Tal como estoy discutiendo con Poco a poco, todas las papeletas deben de incluir la plantilla {{De minimis}}, con el argumento "The party logo", lo cual viene a traducirse en que, aceptamos barco porque es el logo es muy pequeño. Puedes ver un ejemplo aquí. Es la suposición con la que trabajamos. Aunque quizá sea necesario incluirlo expresamente (cosa que paso a hacer inmediatamente). Muchas gracias por tu colaboración :-) --Discasto _talk 16:35, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Resuelto :-) --Discasto _talk 17:28, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

B25es (talk) 15:12, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Hola, me gustaría pedirte artículo de este matemático y pedagogo asturiano de comienzos del S.XX. Gracias. --83.36.85.97 09:49, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Habería algún problema con esta obra:

• File:The Chaotic World of Amy Winehouse.jpg

ó derivar desta outra fotografía: Amy Winehouse, Hovefestivalen 2007. Foto: Kim Erlandsen, NRK P3 --Dodro (talk) 14:13, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

• xa imaxinaba. Saudos --Dodro (talk) 23:42, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Castelo de Castro Caldelas has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Elisardojm (talk) 10:19, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ricardo Gómez Buceta.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:00, 19 September 2016 (UTC)