User talk:Gzen92/VI/2018

•  Support - Useful, best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support - Useful, best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:35, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Si c'est une villa classée il faut rajouter le bandeau Mérimée --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Pardon, au temps pour moi. Gzen92 ^[discuter] 07:19, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:38, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The building looks big, so you can reduce the scoope by adding geographic direction (exposure from N). --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:44, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Thanks you. Gzen92 ^[discuter] 15:52, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:13, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment I suggest cropping the left-hand 25% and the bottom 25% from the image. This will improve the focus on the fort itself. Martinvl (talk) 10:51, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Thanks for the observation. Gzen92 ^[discuter] 11:33, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support I have checked this nomination against all six VI criteria and am happy to support its nomination as a VI. Martinvl (talk) 15:59, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Not a good picture, but apparently the only one we have of this chalice. That's why it seems useful. Lothar Spurzem (talk)

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:07, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment For this type of monument that has a complex shape must give the sense of shooting (view from south or north ...) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Thanks you. Gzen92 ^[discuter] 07:12, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:22, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Good image. Not yet used but useful as I think. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 12:40, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Used now, replacing the other image. Gzen92 ^[discuter] 12:43, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Used and useful -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:30, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Perspective correction necessary --Llez (talk) 17:47, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Gzen92 ^[discuter] 07:40, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 07:41, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The antenna is lacking; this one would be better if it weren't unsharp --Llez (talk) 17:50, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, but here we see better the structure of the building as described in historical monuments. And the antenna may not be part of the original building. Gzen92 ^[discuter] 07:49, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Support OK, best in scope --Llez (talk) 07:42, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment It would be good to put the view orientation. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Gzen92 ^[discuter] 07:16, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:40, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment It would be good to put the view orientation. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Gzen92 ^[discuter] 07:16, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:41, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I know quality is not the top criterion at VI, but this falls short of what we should expect - assuming this chapel merits a scope. Charles (talk) 11:39, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]