User talk:Clic

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Clic!

Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文（台灣）‎ | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 22:08, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So, you created Category:Trams with fleet number 2034 (and many other such cats). Do you plan on creating the missing Category:Number 2034 on trams (ditto for the other affected numbers), that links your new cat and its contents to other tram numbers and other uses of 2034 (ditto), or not? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 10:55, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, of course, but you were faster ;-)

BTW, can you explain,why this complex category sheme is used, where most categories only have one single subcategory? --Clic (talk) 11:06, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Clic: I just added you to an ongoing discussion: In my opinion, there should not be this kind of detail for most cases — I only created "Trams with fleet number NNN" when there’s also material for a "Trams on route NNN" to contrast it against, otherwise I advocate to keep everything together in "Number NNN on trams", or even in "Number NNN on vehicles", depending on how many items we have to populate these cats. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 11:28, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Tuvalkin: "Trams with fleet number NNN" and "Trams on route NNN" are both useful, but "Trams with fleet number NNN" and "Number NNN on trams" seem to be the same in most cases. In many categories some pictures are in "Number NNN on trams" even if they show a fleet number and a matching subcategory "Trams with fleet number NNN" exist. --Clic (talk) 11:35, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning your 1st and 2nd points (both useful but often only fleet# exists): Yes, that’s my point at Category talk:Numbers on trams#Splitting these subcats. About the 3rd: That’s because some people are busy creating cats but neglect to populate them with stuff that’s left in the parent cats (e.g.: You created Category:Number 2034 on rail vehicles, but didn’t move these four media items onto it — of course this was just now, but other users have been creating all these cats, especially about buses, and then neglecting for years to move stuff into them, which kinda defeats the whole idea of creating them in the 1st place…). -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 11:46, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Clic, bitte prüfe gründlich, welche Fotos aus Chemnitz und Umgebung du in die Straßenbahnkategorie schiebst (und korrigiere das bitte wieder). Dir sind unlängst mehrere Fehler unterlaufen, z.B. hier und hier. Das sind nur Beispiele. Auf den konkreten Bildern ist ausschließlich Eisenbahnverkehr zu sehen, sowohl strecken- als auch fahrzeugseitig. Dass die Fahrzeuge neben ihrer vollen nationalen Eisenbahnzulassung auch noch eine BOStrab-Zulassung konkret für das Chemnitzer Straßenbahnnetz haben, führt nicht dazu, dass man sie auf jedem Bild in die Straßenbahnkategorie schieben kann. Ich bin zu diesem Thema auch mit dem Einsteller der Fotos im Gespräch, siehe hier. Nicht alles, was nach Straßenbahnbetrieb aussieht, ist auch wirklich Straßenbahnbetrieb, die de facto vorhandenen Schnittstellen sind zu beachten. Grüße, --Kleeblatt187 (talk) 22:54, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ein Paar Minuen zu spät ich habe gesehen, dass ich habe fehler gemaht. Ich habe Kategorie geträgt (Category:Düwag 8NGTW in Kassel). Aber ein Paar ist Düwag, und ein Paar Bombardier. Was kann ich jetzt machen? Zwiadowca ²¹ 17:54, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nechste mal wann sind mehr wie drei Trams du kannst neue Kategorie machen. Zwiadowca ²¹ 20:28, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gute Idee, ich habe eine Hauptkategorie Tram transport in Heidelberg by year angelegt, wie in den anderen Städten. Da können dann die einzelnen Jahre rein.--Clic (talk) 21:21, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Christian, warum hast du bei meinen S8-Bildern File:Steilrampe Erkrath-Hochdahl (12).jpg, File:Steilrampe Erkrath-Hochdahl (11).jpg, File:Steilrampe Erkrath-Hochdahl (10).jpg und File:Steilrampe Erkrath-Hochdahl (9).jpg auf der Steilrampe Hochdahl die Kategorie Category:S-Bahn Rhein-Ruhr trains entfernt? Danke für Info, --Joschi71 (talk) 21:58, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Joschi71, alle Bilder sollten so genau wie möglich in Unterkategorien eingeordnet sein, um übergeordnete Kategorien übersichtlich zu halten. Deine Bilder passen in die Category:DBAG_Class_1440, eine Unterkategorie von Category:S-Bahn Rhein-Ruhr trains. Und da sind sie auch zu finden. --Clic (talk) 22:12, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ah ok, ich war irritiert, weil ich nicht gedacht hätte, dass es die DB AG Class 1440 nur bei der S-Bahn Rhein-Ruhr gibt. Danke --Joschi71 (talk) 17:07, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, in anderen Regionen gibt es (bis jetzt) nur die älteren Alstom Coradia Continental, Category:DBAG_Class_440. Sollte sich das mal ändern, müssten wir natürlich die Kategorien entsprechend umsortieren.--Clic (talk) 18:07, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ich kenne mich da nicht so aus, aber warum hast Du die c:Category:DBAG Class 642 aus den beiden Bildern c:File:Laußnitzer Heide Train.jpg und c:File:Laußnitzer Heide Train alt.jpg entfernt? Es ist doch ein 642. oder? --PaulT (talk) 06:58, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo PaulT, Deine Fotos zeigen einen Siemens Desiro der Mitteldeutschen Regiobahn. Dort hast Du die Fotos auch genau richtig einsortiert. Dabei handelt es sich um eine Unterkategorie der Kategorie Category:Siemens Desiro in Germany. Die Baureihe 642 der DB ist ebenfalls eine Unterkategorie davon. Es wäre aber sinnlos, alle Züge dieser Siemens-Bauart bei der DB einzusortieren, auch wenn sie von anderen Bahngesellschaften betrieben werden. --Clic (talk) 07:51, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Liebe(r) Clic, dann verstehe ich aber nicht die c:Category:DBAG Class 642 of Erzgebirgsbahn (eine Unterkategorie von c:Category:DBAG Class 642). Ist das dann nicht falsch? Ich hatte das DBAG davor so interpretiert, dass die anderen Bahnen auch die Fahrzeuge gekauft haben, die für die DBAG in der Baureihe 642 entwickelt wurden. --PaulT (talk) 10:25, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Guter Einwand. Ich gehe davon aus, die Kategorie wurde als Unterkategorie von DBAG angelegt, und nicht als eigene, weil die Erzgebirgsbahn eine Tochterfirma der DBAG ist. --Clic (talk) 06:14, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Danke, wieder was gelernt. Die Mitteldeutsche Regiobahn gehört zu trandev und die Erzgebirgsbagn zur DB. Das hatte ich nicht gewusst. --PaulT (talk) 06:59, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Clic. I saw you categorized many pictures of subway stations (U-Bahnhof) in Category:Train stations in Germany photographed in 2020 and I wonder why, because a subway / metro / U-Bahn station is not a train station. Don't you agree? Greeting, Eissink (talk) 16:21, 9 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Hallo Clic, du hattest in diversen Kategorien die GeoGroup Anweisungen entfernt und durch eine zentrale, wohl in Template:Districts of Lower Saxony, ersetzt. Dabei ist jetzt stets Level=3 aktiv. Das hat den Nachteil, dass die Rechenzeit länger ist, und dass jetzt zusätzliche Ergebnisse kommen die man vorher nicht hatte, etwa bei Category:Buildings in Wilhelmshaven sind jetzt Treffer in Rostock dabei. Das sind zwar im Prinzip Fehler in der Einordnung der Kategorien, so ganz glücklich bin ich aber mit deiner Änderung nicht. -- Gerd Fahrenhorst (talk) 13:20, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Guten Tag, ich hab das o.a. Foto in einem meiner Projekte verwendet und bedanke mich dafür. Es ist in einem youtube-Video. "fast and simple - nur drei Tasten" Viele Grüße Hilmar Bieling

Deutsch: Seenotrettungsboot SRB66 Hans Dittmer der Deutschen Gesellschaft zur Rettung Schiffbrüchiger (DGzRS) bei der Ausfahrt aus dem Hafen Norddeich Mole Date 3 January 2019, 09:22:43 Source Own work Author Clic Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license Das Foto wurde von mir gespiegelt und geringfügig verwischt. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A02:8108:9640:1ED4:9163:1E6B:F591:C453 (talk) 12:52, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You removed from this category from several files. As long the type of tram in the picture is not defined by a subcategory, I keep the files in the uppercategory so that hopefully someone will later classify them. A 'Tram transport in Leipzig by year' category does not have 'trams in Leipzig' as upper category. ('Tram transport in Leipzig' is not same) Smiley.toerist (talk) 12:02, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll sort the photos into the categories that match the tram series when I get the chance. --Clic (talk) 13:08, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Servus Clic, ich habe soeben eine neue Kategorisierung für Schienenverkehr in DE nach Monat eingeführt (so, wie es sie z.B. bereits für Österreih gibt). Beispiel: June 2021 in rail transport in Germany mit entsprechendem Template Rail transport germany month. Ich werde diese Kategorisierung aber nur beiläufig bearbeiten, also wenn Du dich intensiver darum kümmern magst... Gruss anro (talk) 22:15, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, bist du dir sicher, dass die Züge vom Vlexx Talent 2 sind? Die Internetseite von Vlexx beschreibt ihre Züge als Talent 3, mitsamt einem Bild vom "8442 642". Die deutschen Talent 3 wurden zwar bisher alle mit der dem Talent 2 entsprechenden Fahrzeugfront ausgeliefert, aber auch die 8442 der SWEG scheinen Talent 3 zu sein (siehe Eurailpress). MfG, Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 20:08, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Clic, da in der Rechtsprechung strittig ist, ob Werke in Bahnhöfen usw. tatsächlich unter die Panoramafreiheit fallen, wäre es vielleicht klug, wenn du für dieses Bild beim Künstler, der ja noch lebt[1], eine Genehmigung einholen könntest. Andernfalls besteht das Risiko, dass irgendwann mal ein LA darauf gestellt wird. --Túrelio (talk) 13:59, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:Stadtbahn Bochum Bermuda3eck 1902191546.jpg

And also:

• File:Stadtbahn Bochum Bermuda3eck 1902191547.jpg
• File:Stadtbahn Bochum Bermuda3eck 1902191548.jpg
• File:Straßenbahn Bochum 308 536 Bermuda3eck 190219.jpg

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 17:04, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stadtbahn Bochum Hauptbahnhof 1901131123.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Lukas Beck (talk) 17:06, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:Stadtbahn Dortmund Hauptbahnhof 1709170935.jpg

And also:

• File:Stadtbahn Dortmund Hauptbahnhof 1709170936.jpg
• File:Stadtbahn Dortmund Hauptbahnhof 1709170937.jpg
• File:Stadtbahn Dortmund Hauptbahnhof 1709170939.jpg
• File:Stadtbahn Dortmund Hauptbahnhof 171201.jpg
• File:Stadtbahn Dortmund Hauptbahnhof 1903231809.jpg
• File:Stadtbahn Dortmund Hauptbahnhof 1903231810.jpg
• File:Stadtbahn Dortmund Hauptbahnhof 2005290822.jpg

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 17:12, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:Stadtbahn Dortmund Hauptbahnhof 2005290818.jpg

And also:

• File:Stadtbahn Dortmund Hauptbahnhof 2005290819.jpg
• File:Stadtbahn Dortmund Hauptbahnhof 2005290821.jpg
• File:Stadtbahn Dortmund Hauptbahnhof 2005290828.jpg
• File:Stadtbahn Dortmund Hauptbahnhof 2005290829.jpg
• File:Stadtbahn Dortmund Hauptbahnhof 2005290830.jpg

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 17:15, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:Stadtbahn Hannover 1 2021 Hauptbahnhof 2305170557.jpg

And also:

• File:Stadtbahn Hannover 2 2003 Hauptbahnhof 2305170551.jpg
• File:Stadtbahn Hannover 8 3081 Hauptbahnhof 2305170602.jpg

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 10:07, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stadtbahn Hannover 2 2012 Hauptbahnhof 2305290802.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Lukas Beck (talk) 10:14, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stadtbahn Hannover 8 2515 Hauptbahnhof 2302030611.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Lukas Beck (talk) 10:33, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:Stadtbahn Hannover Kröpcke 2006280826.jpg

And also:

• File:Stadtbahn Hannover Kröpcke 2107180757.jpg
• File:Stadtbahn Hannover Kröpcke 2107180758.jpg

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 10:35, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Android Pie 9.0 Startbildschirm.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Wallpaper and icons (Maybe) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

 

Артём 13327 (talk) 13:40, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Clic, ich schlage vor dass du zukünftig die Region Hannover ohne ein "the" vorweg schreibst. "Region Hannover" ist nämlich m.E. ein Eigenname ähnlich "Landkreis Lüneburg" wo wir ja auch nicht schreiben "Buildings in the Landkreis Lüneburg". Category:Rail transport in Region Hannover ist aus meiner Sicht korrekt, die Ebenen darunter nicht. Was meinst du? -- Gerd Fahrenhorst (talk) 12:23, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, bei Landkreisen ist es auch ohne "the". Ich habe die Bezeichnungen aus Templates übernommen, wo ich teilweise sehr "kreative" Umwege gesehen habe, wie für diese Region extra ein "the" eingebaut wurde. Das hatte mich zwar etwas gewundert, habe aber irgendeinen versteckten Sinn dahinter vermutet. Clic (talk) 12:26, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:Straßenbahn Duisburg Rathaus 2401200904.jpg

And also:

• File:Straßenbahn Duisburg Rathaus 2401200905.jpg
• File:Straßenbahn Duisburg Rathaus 2401200906.jpg
• File:Straßenbahn Duisburg Rathaus 2401200910.jpg

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 08:00, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with {{SD|C2}} if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available or {{SD|C1}} if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused. In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page, as you did at Category:Things named after Nordrhein-Westfalen. ("C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion). Jmabel ! talk 06:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, danke. Das kannte ich so noch nicht ;-) Clic (talk) 11:52, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte keine Bilder in diese Kategorie einfügen. Diese Kategorie sollte nur weitere Kategorie beinhalten!!! Danke Lukas Beck (talk) 14:12, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oops... 🙈 Danke für den Hinweis, war ein Fehler, und schon korrigiert. Clic (talk) 14:16, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:Stadtbahn Hannover 8 3035 Hauptbahnhof 2410230656.jpg

And also:

• File:Stadtbahn Hannover 8 3035 Hauptbahnhof 2410230657.jpg

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 09:53, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]