User talk:Charly Whisky

(die hier überwiegenden grundlosen URV-Diskussionen habe ich nach Ablauf einer gewissen Zeit einfach gelöscht)

This user believes in assuming good faith and civility.

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Spoon Rest A.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 85.179.171.114 05:41, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Habt ihr wieder was gefunden?

Ich finde es sehr interessant, dass solche Löschandrohungen immer von IP's vorgenommen werden. Dieses spezielle Thema ist schon sehr alt (see archive: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Charly_Whisky&oldid=4670008) Die Quelle des Bildes ist GDFL. Der Fotograf Frank Roozendaal ist hier Co-Author der Homepage [1]. Wenn euch das nicht reicht, dann müsst ihr das Bild eben löschen, ich habe keine Lust, dieses sinnlos wiederholte URV-gelabere weiter mitzumachen. --Charly Whisky (talk) 13:37, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--Charly Whisky (talk) 17:06, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Antennendiagramm2.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 07:34, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This picture was self created and a free documentation too (see the source)

You may delete all my pictures - let's go!

Charly Whisky (talk) 17:48, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Antennendiagramm1.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 85.177.46.204 05:56, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Monopulseprinzip2.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 85.179.169.77 06:13, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello Charly Whisky!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. 85.177.36.150 06:35, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Fan_beamp.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:58, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aha: Ich habe dort als Quelle {{own}} angegeben. Sollte ich vielleicht {{own}} {{own}} sagen? Ist es so schwer, auf meiner Benutzerseite die Message zu lesen, dass das Radartutorial

1. mein eigenes Werk ist, und
2. unter GDFL und CC-BY-sa veröffentlicht wurde?

--Charly Whisky (talk) 21:49, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Pierre cb (talk) 15:15, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Umgang mit Kritik: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASteinsplitter&type=revision&diff=530672526&oldid=530671949 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charly Whisky (talk • contribs) 16:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC) Es gab zwar einen Anlass, aber trotzdem war die Kritik eher an das System gerichtet denn an den einzelnen Benutzer:[reply]

Original: „Man kann einen Artikel derart gut vorbereiten, dass ein einzelner Edit genügt um einen mehrere zehn Kilobyte großen neuen Artikel zu erstellen. Man kann an diesem Artikel aber auch jeden Satz einzeln editieren und in jedem Satz noch die Tippfehler mit zusätzlichen Edits korrigieren, was dann bei den Editcounts sehr viel günstiger kommt. Der Artikel bleibt derselbe, ob mit einem einzelnen Edit, oder mit hunderten Kleinedits erstellt. Ich finde es deshalb recht abartig, die Anzahl gemachter Edits als Kriterium für eine Wahlentscheidung zu machen.“

Übersetzung: “You can prepare an article so well that a single edit is enough to create a new article several tens of kilobytes in size. However, you can also edit each sentence individually and correct typos in each sentence with additional edits, which is much more convenient in terms of edit counts. The article remains the same, whether created with a single edit, or with hundreds of small edits. I find it therefore quite disgusting to make the number of made edits as a criterion for an election decision” (or even for election eligibility in Wikipedia). --Charly Whisky (talk) 18:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Charly Whisky,

hier noch ein bißchen Erläuterung auf deutsch. Natürlich ist der Editcount allein kein ausreichend valides Kriterium, dennoch ist er auf Commons ein gewisses Indiz. Du hast dich in deinem obigen Kommentar auf Wikipedia bezogen; hier auf Commons ist das Spektrum an Edits üblicherweise etwas anders, wobei man hier natürlich auch z.B. mit massenhaften Category-Edits den Counter treiben könnte, wenn man wollte. Andererseits kann man mit manchen Edit-Counter-Tools durchaus sehen in welchen Service-Bereichen jemand oft gearbeitet hat.[2] Richtig ist auch dass man sich vor Editcountitis hüten sollte, obwohl wahrscheinlich viele von uns bereits Episoden davon durchgemacht haben; Wikipedia/Commons ist halt de facto meritokratisch geprägt.

Wichtiger für dein Wohlbefinden hier scheint mir aber, dass du nicht jeden Edit oder Äusserung, der/die auf den ersten Blick weniger freundlich wirkt, als gegen dich gerichtet deuten solltest. Im ersten Moment dieses Gefühl zu haben, ist nur natürlich. Aber wohl jeder, der schon längere Zeit online kommuniziert/agiert, wird irgendwann gemerkt haben, dass online-Kommunikation relevante Defizite gegenüber direkter Präsenz-Kommunikation hat. Das begann ja schon mit der Email-Ära. Die Deutung eines an mich oder von mir an jemand anderen gerichteten Satzes kann halt viel schwieriger sein, wenn das "Korrektiv" des Gegenübers fehlt, dessen Gesichtsausdruck oder Tonfall. [Sexismus AN]Zudem kommunizieren Männer meist sehr knapp, was Mißdeutungen zusätzlich fördern kann.[Sexismus AUS]

Im Zweifelsfall besser eine eigene Äusserung nochmal überdenken oder etwas anderes dazwischenschieben, bevor man auf Speichern/Absenden klickt. Und genauso mit der Wahrnehmung/Reaktion auf Äusserungen anderer. Also, leg nicht jede Äusserung auf die Goldwaage. Wenn eine Mißdeutung ausgeschlossen ist, die Sache aber nicht wichtig ist, kann man sich aus der versuchten Kommunikation auch einfach mal zurückziehen. Happy editing. --Túrelio (talk) 09:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Es gibt also auf Commons auch einen freundlichen Administrator. (Damit stürzen bei mir ja ganze Weltbilder zusammen!)--Charly Whisky (talk) 10:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]