User talk:0x0a

Archives 2020 - 2022, 2023, 2024

I've now reviewed 1,000 images uploaded under the rationales expressed in the {{PD-NWS}} template and requested deletion of several.

The arguments for deletion, and to keep, are now following repetitive, predictable patterns and it would greatly help all involved if we could centralise discussion and obtain some wider community input.

Therefore, I have opened an RfC to gather opinions. Apologies in advance: it's long and detailed, but is frankly nothing compared to the words and time expended by all parties up to this point. Probably the most crucial issue revolves around how we interpret a general disclaimer published at weather.gov (Q.1 in the RfC).

Your advice is greatly appreciated! --Rlandmann (talk) 10:36, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Android Auto UI.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

shizhao (talk) 02:19, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bonthefox3 2001:EE0:4D4C:7F10:1135:2490:77AB:1134 12:42, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We don't delete user page. We archive them. 0x0a (talk) 13:49, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We don't delete user talk pages, but we delete user-pages if the user makes a request, but I wonder why you're asking if here? ─ Aafī on Mobile ^(talk) 06:45, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, File:Camila Cabello - GODSPEED (Live from the 2024 MTV VMAs).jpg I uploaded this file but i still didn't understand why it's fake license, could you please explain? Also, then what license should be replaced in this file? I'm sorry for uploading non free files on common wikipedia, it was almost a year so I think I forgot warning... Camilasdandelions (talk) 08:32, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Camilasdandelions: The videos on YouTube are copyright-protected by default and should not be uploaded here unless the author explicitly states that they are released under a Creative Commons Attribution License, e.g. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsCxG0MTrJs). 0x0a (talk) 08:43, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Camilasdandelions: Please try to upload your own photos first to avoid copyright problems, and then upload external images after you know some basic copyright knowledge. --0x0a (talk) 08:47, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, then what situation is always accepted? I thought YouTube videos are always okay to be uploaded, but now I'll not upload it unless those permissions in description. Camilasdandelions (talk) 09:31, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Camilasdandelions: Please describe a specific situation, otherwise I cannot answer. Generally, the most of the MVs and album covers are not OK to upload because of copyright protection. These pages COM:CB and COM:L list what situations or licenses are acceptable. 0x0a (talk) 10:07, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well the main reason why I thought YT vid is OK to be uploaded is, File:Ariana Grande at the Met Gala 2024 (1).jpg#mw-jump-to-license. This file is also from YouTube, VOGUE, but I'm not sure if this is marked as "free-use" in description.

Accoring to this, upon file was uploaded by Vogue magazine, then can files from Vogue always be used in Wikimedia?

Also I can't figure out what's a difference between CC 3.0, 2,0, 4,0 etc. Camilasdandelions (talk) 10:26, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see only a few Vogue Taiwan videos released under Creative Commons Attribution License, and we do host some of them. If you're not sure if a material is OK to be uploaded, you can ask here to get a prompt response. In addition, all CC versions (1.0, 2.0 ... 4.0) are acceptable, and you don't need to care about the differences between them. 0x0a (talk) 12:05, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I definitely have some experience with vogue Taiwan licensing, We have all of their CC stuff. All the Best -- Chuck ^Talk 19:03, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Houston, Texas Skyline 2017.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Houston, Texas Skyline 2017.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]