Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 25 2018
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Terracotta at Pancha Ratna Govinda Temple. --RockyMasum 04:27, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support - Good quality. Please skip a line between nominations. -- Ikan Kekek 04:38, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shops in Paro, Bhutan --Bgag 03:28, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shops in Paro, Bhutan --Bgag 03:28, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Temple in Paro, Bhutan --Bgag 03:28, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Western view of the fire station in Kraig on Landesstrasse #10, Frauenstein, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:13, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 03:30, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Westnorthwestern view of the former provost house in Kraig on Landesstrasse #5, Frauenstein, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:13, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 03:30, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Western view of guesthouse Matschnig in Kraig on Landesstrasse #2, Frauenstein, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:13, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 03:30, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fallen Tree in Dormer Place, Leamington Spa --Vauxford 21:00, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 22:20, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rover at European Rover Challenge 2018 in Starachowice, Poland --Jakubhal 21:02, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 22:23, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Village houses in Ramales de la Victoria. Cantabria, Spain --Basotxerri 18:08, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion I don't like the shadows in bottom left corner, but good quality and a QI for sure --Carschten 18:20, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Model of Dassault Falcon 200 LXS --MB-one 18:03, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:09, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St. Peter's Church in Ramales de la Victoria. Cantabria, Spain --Basotxerri 17:54, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:20, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Poltrona Frau armchair, Passenger Experience Week 2018, Hamburg --MB-one 17:24, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:20, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vintage Mercedes bus in Mannheim --MB-one 17:24, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:20, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Front facade of the Trakai Island Castle in Trakai, Lithuania. --Pofka 16:42, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:20, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Neglected condition at the former Bradbury Barracks in Krefeld --Carschten 11:43, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality, but composition could be better: A lot of grass in the foreground. Categorization could be better: Entrance, gate,... --XRay 14:52, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Done improved categorization, thank you! The grass was part of the composition to show the neglected, abandoned situation, but I'm not sure if it's successful. --Carschten 18:20, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ancien couvent des Carmes Chaussés de Wavre --Trougnouf 11:04, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Nice perspective and overall good quality. But like in the other picture saturation is a bit high. --Zinnmann 21:17, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Done, thank you for reviewing! Let me know if this is good and I will apply similar settings to the panorama. --Trougnouf 22:23, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Support Looks fine for me, now! Thank you! --Zinnmann 00:05, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gebackener Speisekarpfen Haagenhof HaJN 6479 --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 10:52, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Isiwal 16:16, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Waterfall Murfrëit in Sëlva, Gröden - South Tyrol. --Moroder 09:26, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:43, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Neustadt an der Weinstraße, Konrad-Adenauer-Straße 22 --Berthold Werner 09:20, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:43, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stable in Gościeszyn 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:43, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stable in Gościeszyn 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:43, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Riding hall in Gościeszyn 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:06, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Riding hall in Gościeszyn 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:43, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Remains of cut tree trunks on the dry edges, after the summer, of the Vézoles lake. On the riverbank a Picea abies forest. Commune of Prémian (Hérault, France). By User:Christian Ferrer --Basile Morin 08:44, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:44, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Silver-studded blue (Plebejus argus) female, Sweden --Charlesjsharp 08:07, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:44, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Silver-studded blue (Plebejus argus) male, Sweden --Charlesjsharp 08:07, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:53, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Silver-studded blue (Plebejus argus) male, Sweden --Charlesjsharp 08:07, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:44, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Brilliant emerald (Somatochlora metallica) teneral female, Surrey --Charlesjsharp 08:07, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:53, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Brilliant emerald (Somatochlora metallica) teneral female, Surrey --Charlesjsharp 08:07, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 08:48, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ehemaliges Pfarrhaus, Haupstraße 2 (Markt Erlbach) --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 08:04, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Nice one. --Zinnmann 21:17, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former mill in Baunach Würzburger Straße 11 --Ermell 07:14, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:51, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fiat 500 L Berlina at ADAC Deutschland Klassik 2018 --Ermell 07:14, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:48, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Baunach old bridge --Ermell 07:14, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:51, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Loire River in Blois, Loir-et-Cher, France. --Tournasol7 06:49, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:19, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Indre river in Loches, Indre-et-Loire, France. --Tournasol7 06:49, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:48, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rue de la Justice in Uzerche, Correze, France. --Tournasol7 06:49, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:48, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bedside of the Saint John the Baptist church of Chenonceaux, Indre-et-Loire, France. --Tournasol7 06:49, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:18, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Window of the Castle of Fougeres-sur-Bievre, Loir-et-Cher, France. --Tournasol7 06:49, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:48, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palace, Used, Zaragoza, Spain. --Poco a poco 06:28, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:16, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of James the Greater, Orera, Zaragoza, Spain. --Poco a poco 06:28, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, Tournasol7 06:55, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hermitage and wayside cross of San Sebastián, Urrea de Jalón, Zaragoza, Spain. --Poco a poco 06:28, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, Tournasol7 07:02, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palace house of the Marquess of Ariza, Ariza, Zaragoza, Spain. --Poco a poco 06:28, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:17, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schönbühel castle in Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Lower Austria --Uoaei1 06:18, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:25, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination "Cast-iron eyecatcher" by Ingrid Hartlieb, cast iron, 2015, Skulpturenweg Maulbronn, Germany --Llez 05:35, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ercé 06:01, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wiesmann GT MF5 at Wiesmann Sports Cars, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:24, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:38, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sint-Salvatorskathedraal, Bruges, Belgium --XRay 04:24, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:38, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former provost house in Kraig on Landesstrasse #5, Frauenstein, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:24, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:40, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parish and collegiate church Saint John the Baptist in Kraig, Frauenstein, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:24, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 06:12, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Renaissance fresco of Jesus Christ on the Mount of Olives at the porch of the parish church Saint John the Baptist in Kraig, Frauenstein, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:24, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 06:14, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Congregational Church - Inside --Sumitsurai 20:36, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Rbrechko 11:29, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Driebes, Guadalajara, Spain. --Poco a poco 20:03, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, but bad weather for making nice photos --Michielverbeek 06:31, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Casas de San Galindo, Guadalajara, Spain. --Poco a poco 20:03, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Looks good. --Rbrechko 11:28, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shell of a Gualtieri's Sundial, Architectonica gualtierii --Llez 15:18, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, pretty shell. -- Ikan Kekek 17:05, 21 September 2018 (UTC) Support Well, promote it, then. :P --Peulle 18:21, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Of course I meant to do so. Thanks for taking care of it. -- Ikan Kekek 21:20, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Obere Bahnhohstraße 19 --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 18:18, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose That post is blocking part of the subject, it looks like it could have been avoided. --Trougnouf 11:49, 22 September 2018 (UTC)I don´t understand your hintǃ If you mean the coupled columns around the property. It´s part of the property monument. Must set original, otherwise owner don´t get money for restauration.--~~~~
-
- Nomination Cirrus uncinus clouds. Taken in Swifts Creek, Victoria, Australia in March 2008. By User:Fir0002 --SpanishSnake 14:04, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose below 2megapixels (Commons:Quality_images_candidates#Resolution) --Trougnouf 17:43, 20 September 2018 (UTC) Yes, and license not OK for QI. Yann 16:01, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ipswich school library building. A grade II listed building. --Sumitsurai 14:35, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good for me. --Rbrechko 14:46, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trier Irsch, Katholische Pfarrkirche St. Georg und St. Wendelinus --Berthold Werner 06:59, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Rbrechko 14:44, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Uttara Ganabhaban (meaning Northern People's House) is an 18th-century (1734) a royal palace also known as Jaminder country house and retreat, it was made by Raja Doyaram who was the Dewan (like minister) of Rani Bhavanee. --ShahadatHossain 17:12, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- Decline pixelation, some shadows are just black and other are too bright, distorted. --Carschten 18:26, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Meadow brown (Maniola jurtina), Sweden --Charlesjsharp 09:04, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good for me. --Rbrechko 14:57, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination One of the towers of medieval fortress Mutso, province of Khevsureti (now part of Mtskheta-Mtianeti region), Georgia.This is a photo of a monument in Georgia identified by the ID --Moahim 08:15, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion High resolution image uploaded. --Moahim 14:41, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Support shadows are noisy, but overall a really great picture. --Carschten 18:26, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle, Torrehermosa, Zaragoza, Spain. --Poco a poco 11:11, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 11:53, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Obere Bahnhohstraße 19 (Cadolzburg) HaJN 5938 HP --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 08:44, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Zwei Scheunen der ehemaligen Leichendorfer Mühle --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 08:42, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Small rapids in Bjøllåelva and a pale rainbow. --Frankemann 08:40, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Very nice. I think f/16 makes the image too soft but there is enough detail in the foreground and I'm a sucker for rainbows and pretty nature stuff --Trougnouf 11:48, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Kruhkki from Søre Kjerkesteinen in Bjøllådalen. --Frankemann 08:40, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Pretty but with f/16 no part of the image is particularly sharp at 6MP --Trougnouf 11:46, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from Krokkimyra towards Tjammbo lit by the evening sun. --Frankemann 08:40, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Most of the image is very dark, and there's already noise, not sure you could correct it with a sane signal-to-noise ratio (should have been a lower iso and shutter speed imo) but feel free to try and put it up for discussion --Trougnouf 11:44, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Mohera Zamindar Bari. By User:Santanuda --RockyMasum 05:03, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Review
Sharpness is not good enough. And the building is leaning in. Please fix the issues. --XRay 06:27, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tour Saint-Nicolas et tour de la Chaîne. --Theklan 18:10, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion I trust the warm tone, not so bad. But I don´t like the vignette. Maybee you will change it? I can imagine it will not like so antiquated--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 08:56, 16 September 2018 (UTC)@Hans-Jürgen Neubert: done!-Theklan 17:37, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Yann 13:32, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside cross of the Virgin of Carmen, Villafeliche, Zaragoza, Spain. --Poco a poco 20:41, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Less noisy than the other one ... perhaps it could be cleaned up? --Daniel Case 16:39, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Done Poco a poco 08:53, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 11:39, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aldenueva de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain. --Poco a poco 17:52, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
CA on trees at sides --Daniel Case 05:20, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Done --Poco a poco 20:06, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Yann 13:35, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Street light in Marburg --Hydro 21:26, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment looks oversharpened to me --Carschten 21:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Comment Yes it looks oversharpened in the previews, but in my opinion it is well sharpened in full size. --Hydro 20:31, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Neutral seems also oversharpened in full size to me. But I'm not really sure about it, someone other may evaluate this image. --Carschten 19:42, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Yann 13:36, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Christuskirche_(Mainz).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Christuskirche, Mainz. It´s rather difficult to find a free prospect on this church in the narrow city. --Milseburg 20:51, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support - Nice. I find the pixellation of the license plates very distracting, though. If there's really an important reason to do that, please find a less distracting way to do it. -- Ikan Kekek 21:29, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
OpposeI disagree. Don’t think these distracting cars and the traffic sign make this a great photo. There surely are better ways to take a good picture of the church --Moroder 21:55, 20 September 2018 (UTC)- I think your specific points are clearly made, but on great photos: Photos don't have to be great to be QIs. That's for FPC. No offense to you, as you have shot many wonderful photos (some of which I've been delighted to nominate at FPC), but do you think all your QI photos are great? Ikan Kekek 00:37, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Maybe Moroder got carried away by a [return coach]. I agree with Ikan. This conditions is unfavorable for FP but it´s enough for QI and authentic. I went around this church and didn´t found a better place.--Milseburg (talk) 05:38, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment First of all, this is by no way a return coach. I'm too many years on QIC and FPC to do such things and I didn't pay attention to the author's name of this image. Now, please Ikan don't be personal, we are talking here about this picture not mine. "Great photo" was probably not the best answer to your comment "nice", but my point is that composition , albeit very subjective, is an essential prerequisite for a QI according to the guidelines "foreground and background objects should not be distracting". In conclusion I will not oppose QI but I'd like this candidate to be discussed on CR. Cheers and good light to everybody --Moroder 06:43, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Maybe Moroder got carried away by a [return coach]. I agree with Ikan. This conditions is unfavorable for FP but it´s enough for QI and authentic. I went around this church and didn´t found a better place.--Milseburg (talk) 05:38, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- I think your specific points are clearly made, but on great photos: Photos don't have to be great to be QIs. That's for FPC. No offense to you, as you have shot many wonderful photos (some of which I've been delighted to nominate at FPC), but do you think all your QI photos are great? Ikan Kekek 00:37, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- Info@Ikan Kekek: I´ve been looking for further information: It is legal to show the license plates in this way, as well as random passing people. So I uploaded a new version without the hidden license plates. --Milseburg 12:17, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support very good, especially under this difficult conditions. QI, but obviously not a FP because of the cars etc. I think it's important to have images from every side of a relevant building in Wikipedia(/Commons), and therefore it should be okay to have cars and people on your photo, but for a QI it's the challenge to include them as “harmonious” as possible in it. That's fulfilled to me. --Carschten 19:47, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Basotxerri 17:31, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
File:2018_-_Schweriner_Schloss_-_1.jpg
[edit]- Nomination The Schwerin Castle, the city of Schwerin, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern state, Germany. --Moahim 15:40, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality, nice composition. --GT1976 17:02, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree Sorry, Size is to small. Resolution smaller then 2 MP. Anyway, a real nice composition, with PS Gimmick (shiny window) --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 05:49, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- It was 4.9 Mpx. I've uploaded larger version. --Moahim 06:48, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment - Again, please stop downsizing your photos. That's a violation of QI rules and an excellent reason to decline your nominations. Always submit your full-sized photo - the first time. Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek 08:41, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- Also, it is full size. --Moahim 09:44, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support Image is of acceptable size now. I see the glare from the window too and while it's a little disturbing, I don't think it spoils the image completely.--Peulle (talk) 09:13, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. As for me this glare is important part of image --Moahim 09:35, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- I definitely think you're wrong there. Such a strong light reflection in an image like this is a flaw, not a feature.--Peulle 13:00, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support per Peulle. That degree of glare is definitely a flaw, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 13:20, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case 04:33, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:46, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Basotxerri 17:30, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Loire_River_in_Blois_01.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Loire River in Blois, Loir-et-Cher, France. --Tournasol7 05:27, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support - I suppose someone would say this photo is "overprocessed", but to me it's painterly and beautiful. I would support this for FP, but I'd recommend for you to post to COM:Photography critiques and check what reactions you get before nominating it at FPC. -- Ikan Kekek 06:03, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
OpposeNot OK with the ghost buildings. See note. --Yann 07:12, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- Done, Tournasol7 17:18, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support OK now. --Yann 13:44, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Done, Tournasol7 17:18, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support A really good work imho. Litte bit dusky, but "täts" your style. Much more then a snap. Greatǃ--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 06:48, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Significantly downsized; 7,6MP from a 24MP camera. Opposing per the Guidelines.--Peulle 10:53, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Still artifacts in the sky. --Smial 10:46, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- Done, new version uploaded. Tournasol7 18:53, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support o.k. for me now.--Ermell 07:26, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support --Carschten 12:21, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --Basotxerri 17:30, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
File:KGS_3651_St._Ottilien_Buttisholz.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Kulturgut von nationaler Bedeutung in der Schweiz mit KGS-Nummer --Chme82 20:26, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Real good sidelight, good focus. But really strange clouds and noise in the sky.--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 07:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support I disagree: Good quality. Weather conditions are unusual, but this should not be a reason for a decline. --Kritzolina 07:37, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
OpposeVery good composition, and lighting, but weird noise everywhere, not only in the sky. --Smial 08:39, 18 September 2018 (UTC) Ps: The image noise was developed into a pattern. I've seen this kind of pattern here before, mostly with Nikon camera photos, but occasionally with Canon cameras as well. This pattern reminds a little of Runzelkorn (wrinkled grain?), as one could observe it with wrongly treated film in former times. I could imagine that this is due to some setting in the raw developer or in further image processing. I have tried to improve the noise with NeatImage, but this program has problems with the pattern, although it usually gives excellent results with statistically distributed noise. --Smial 08:57, 18 September 2018 (UTC) (trnslatet with DeepL translator)- Comment"Runzelkorn" i now, from old b/w times ː-( should meaned as "pucker grain". It´s a shock in gelatine, with difference of more then 7-10 degrees (Liquids) in film development process.Pattern is a jpg-bug (not a feature), mostly here, not in print--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 09:33, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support per Kritz. I think the amount of noise in the sky is acceptable - the photo looks beautiful at 300% of my laptop screen. -- Ikan Kekek 08:46, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Opposebeautiful, but too noisy.I don't understand the choice of ISO 800. --Carschten 11:10, 18 September 2018 (UTC)- much better. --Carschten 21:29, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment A hard nut to crack. So, what should be done? Shall I upload another version with less noise or shall I leave it as it is? I'd have another version ready. Some of you definitely will still find some noise in it others will miss some of the details. --Chme82 18:42, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
OpposeToo noisy.I would also like to see more foreground and less sky; less sky is possible, but more foreground?--Michielverbeek 04:42, 19 September 2018 (UTC)- Comment Why? The building is now vertically arranged according to the rule of thirds, if you follow your suggestion, it gets centrally into the middle, which I would consider to be much less favourable. --Smial 11:11, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment A new version has been uploaded. Could you please reconsider your decisions. Thank you. --Chme82 06:50, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- Full Support now, very good rework without losing detail. Remaining noise in the sky is no more disturbing, and not visible in print. Have you figured out how the pattern came about and how to avoid it? This could also help others. As I said, I've seen this pattern in other pictures before. --Smial 11:06, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment I'm not really an expert in RAW processing but I think this kind of weird noise was caused by sharpness settings in Adobe Lightroom. If you set the value of "Amount" to the maximum of 150, you'll get this reticulation (that's the English term for "Runzelkorn" I think) like effect. I've just tried this with several pictures of different cameras (Nikon and Sony) and always came to the same result. The higher ISO has been set, the earlier the effect seems to appear. If Lightroom-presets (there's a preset for sharpening of landscape pictures) have been used (as I did), the value (which would be 40 with in this case and which is said to be a standard value for sharpening) will already be to high. I definitely need to pay bit more attention to that. Others too probably. --Chme82 19:22, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- Many thanks for the explanation! I do not use LR so I never got such results. --Smial 14:36, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment I'm not really an expert in RAW processing but I think this kind of weird noise was caused by sharpness settings in Adobe Lightroom. If you set the value of "Amount" to the maximum of 150, you'll get this reticulation (that's the English term for "Runzelkorn" I think) like effect. I've just tried this with several pictures of different cameras (Nikon and Sony) and always came to the same result. The higher ISO has been set, the earlier the effect seems to appear. If Lightroom-presets (there's a preset for sharpening of landscape pictures) have been used (as I did), the value (which would be 40 with in this case and which is said to be a standard value for sharpening) will already be to high. I definitely need to pay bit more attention to that. Others too probably. --Chme82 19:22, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support ok for me --Uoaei1 10:06, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 15:53, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:47, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Basotxerri 17:29, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Cine_Cervantes,_Borja,_Zaragoza,_España,_2018-03-30,_DD_03.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Cine Cervantes, Borja, Zaragoza, Spain. --Poco a poco 20:41, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Insufficient quality: loses too much sharpness and detail towards the edges. --Peulle 21:18, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- I disagree. Sharpness is adequate, but there seems to be some rainbowy (magenta/green) CA on the roof, especially on the right side. It's pretty, but it probably shouldn't be there. When that's addressed, I will support. -- Ikan Kekek 07:10, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Done Poco a poco 17:28, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Still a small amount of CA on the upper right part of the roof. Can you eliminate it completely? -- Ikan Kekek 22:06, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Done Sorry, I overlooked that Poco a poco 12:11, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support Thanks. Good enough now, I think. -- Ikan Kekek 02:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Really weak support per Peulle, but I feel this is still an acceptable borderline. GerifalteDelSabana 01:57, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 15:47, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:47, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Basotxerri 17:28, 24 September 2018 (UTC)