Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/02/04

suspected copyvio; Photo claims copyright: David Reisler info@davidreisler.de, Uploader claims "own work" Foreign Species (talk) 00:42, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:10, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio|source=http://www.santacasapc.com.br/ Py4nf (talk) 01:01, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:00, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Shxahxh (talk) 18:40, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination uploader request. --Hystrix (talk) 18:46, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Este archivo se subió por error y quiero mejorarlo Manuelsanchezguerrero (talk) 12:44, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: uploader request. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:44, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal file. Out of Commons scope. E4024 (talk) 12:26, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:30, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reuploaded Commons:Deletion requests/File:Farid Sodhy.jpg, unused, out of scope, advert Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 18:37, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: already deleted once. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:30, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Shxahxh (talk) 18:40, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted by Hystrix at 18:43, 4 Februar 2018 UTC: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file --Krdbot 01:40, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

screenshots and studio photos of an actor. uploaded by new user. Likely not own work

• File:الممثل السوري ماهر مزوق 6.jpg
• File:الممثل السوري ماهر مزوق 5.jpg
• File:الممثل السوري ماهر مزوق 4.jpg
• File:الممثل السوري ماهر مزوق 3.jpg
• File:الممثل السوري ماهر مزوق.jpg
• File:الممثل السوري ماهر مزوق 2.jpg
• File:Maher mzouq.jpg

Vera ^(talk) 21:44, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 08:19, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not a free image Shev123 (talk) 11:14, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination - non free image from en-wiki. --Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 17:02, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent photograph of a copyrighted television program (Moiré pattern visible near forehead, edge of screen in bottom-right corner, control overlay bottom-left) AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:38, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted by JGHowes at 13:15, 5 Februar 2018 UTC: Screenshot of non-free content --Krdbot 19:42, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copy of https://pro.magnumphotos.com/Asset/-2TYRYDM433KK.html, © Herbert List/Magnum Photos. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:08, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: Herbert List (1903–1975) was a German photographer. Italian copyright law would apply if he was 1) domiciled in Italy and 2) the photograph was first published in Italy. There is no evidence for either of that. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:42, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copy of https://pro.magnumphotos.com/Asset/-2S5RYD1ONYPR.html, © Herbert List/Magnum Photos. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:10, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: Herbert List (1903–1975) was a German photographer. Italian copyright law would apply if he was 1) domiciled in Italy and 2) the photograph was first published in Italy. There is no evidence for either of that. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:41, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copy of https://pro.magnumphotos.com/Asset/-2S5RYDY6EX_G.html, © Herbert List/Magnum Photos. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:13, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: Herbert List (1903–1975) was a German photographer. Italian copyright law would apply if he was 1) domiciled in Italy and 2) the photograph was first published in Italy. There is no evidence for either of that. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:43, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copy of https://pro.magnumphotos.com/Asset/-2TYRYDKDKBR5.html, © Herbert List/Magnum Photos. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:14, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep La photo a été prisé en Italie, il y a plus de 20 ans et avant 1976, non ? - Groupir ! (talk) 16:43, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: Herbert List (1903–1975) was a German photographer. Italian copyright law would apply if he was 1) domiciled in Italy and 2) the photograph was first published in Italy. There is no evidence for either of that. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:34, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hardly to see where Maria is, not a good one. 219.76.15.12 10:12, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted by Túrelio at 13:26, 6 Februar 2018 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 14:54, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No proof that the author died more than 70 years ago. In accordance with the description of the uploader the photo published by Sárai Imre Rotációs Fényképsokszorosító Budapest IX. Angyal u. 7-A. Imre Sárai was live after 1947, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Horthy Miklós (1).jpg. The uploader says the photo maybe taken by Sándor Hajdú. No proof for year of his death. Regasterios (talk) 13:51, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Symbol keep vote.svg Keep: The author is unknown. The factory (Sárai) did not take the photo. Hajdú Sándor is just a guess. So the author is unknown. The photo was published in November, 1938, as it is a photo on a postcard, manufactured and used at that time. So the photo is free to be published. --Elekes Andor (talk) 16:12, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:31, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

own work and unknow author is impossible. JuTa 07:34, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

{{Help me}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rashid.mahboob (talk • contribs) 2018-02-04T18:16:25‎ (UTC)

See also the previous deleted version at here (admin link only). Its very liekly not own work of the uploader. --JuTa 21:10, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 00:02, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No permission for more than a month. The uploader is not the named author. Note that this is not the same person or image as the previously deleted files of this name. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom, pcp.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 15:43, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted Unsupported license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:31, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:11, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 00:23, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 09:10, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:46, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe too dark and unsharp to be educationally usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 16:37, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:47, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A blurred finger on the left. Superseded by similar view without the fingers File:Toronto skyline at sunrise, 2014 06 27 (7).JPG - panoramio.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:12, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:47, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Finger on the left. Superseded by similar view without the fingers File:Toronto skyline at sunrise, 2014 06 27 (7).JPG - panoramio.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:13, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:47, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal/promotional files

• File:FGDNL10.jpg
• File:FGDNL9.jpg
• File:FGDNL7.jpg
• File:FGDNL8.jpg
• File:FGDNL6.jpg
• File:FGDNL5.jpg
• File:FGDNL4.jpg
• File:FGDNL3.jpg
• File:FGDNL2.jpg
• File:FGDNL1.jpg

Lucy Tipilotu (talk) 04:36, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:33, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal file Lucy Tipilotu (talk) 04:41, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal file Lucy Tipilotu (talk) 04:51, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal file Lucy Tipilotu (talk) 04:51, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:36, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal file Lucy Tipilotu (talk) 04:52, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:36, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal files

• File:Jordan Boone.jpg
• File:Jordan Boone in Las Vegas.jpg

Lucy Tipilotu (talk) 04:53, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:37, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused personal photos/selfies and unlikely to be used in a project.

• File:VL dollar 2017.jpg
• File:VL dollar 2016 .jpg
• File:VL dollar.jpg
• File:VL dollar .jpg

Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:04, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:40, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:07, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:42, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:09, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:42, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:10, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:43, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: Just out of scope. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:12, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:43, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:13, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:43, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Private photos, not used.

• File:Auteur de l´article.jpg
• File:Avinash Reddy .jpg
• File:Bi dos 3.jpg
• File:Juan Aguirre.jpg
• File:Luisluloo.jpg
• File:Marrorra Gamer.png
• File:Mathias Bach.jpg
• File:Nawlesh kumar kiran with children.jpg
• File:Samy 2.jpg
• File:San Jose El Rodeo San Marcos, deportes.jpg
• File:Simoneepica.jpg
• File:Vivek629.jpg
• File:வாகா.jpg

Kulmalukko (talk) 16:44, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:46, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Private photos, not used.

• File:Farmer of the future.jpg
• File:Hdjdjdjjxjjc.png
• File:Jaulian ruins taxila 1.jpg
• File:JeraldGeorge.jpg
• File:Maragogi - Maré Baixa 2013.jpg
• File:Shadow and clouds.jpg
• File:Tufangaj Dot Com Centre Director.jpg
• File:Tufangaj Dot Com Centre1.jpg
• File:八达岭 不到长城非好汉 - panoramio.jpg

Kulmalukko (talk) 19:52, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• • For File:Farmer of the future.jpg -  Keep. The only color photo in category Category:People with sickles. Also good for Category:Farmers from Bangladesh (compare File:A farmer Standing up to the Paddy Fields Irritations.jpg). --Insider (talk) 06:39, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Private photos, not used.

• File:Arjit Pandey.jpg
• File:Danyapitux.jpg
• File:Diet kkm.jpg
• File:Elbohboh.jpg
• File:Elbohboha.jpg
• File:Elbohbohan.jpg
• File:Marlito.jpg
• File:Militante.jpg
• File:Pierina Florencia Fenocchio .jpg
• File:Sumon K Chakrabarti.jpg
• File:Vnoitkumar.jpg
• File:Zakriakhan.jpg

Kulmalukko (talk) 20:04, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not clear, blurred. Superseded by a bit better quality photo File:Night at home.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:12, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:50, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

COM:OOS as unused personal photos, probably for promotion of a non-notable person.

• File:City of Bangkok voyage road hotel jpg.jpg
• File:City of bangkok voyage hotel jpg.jpg

  — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 14:41, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 08:38, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope - unused personal image Lindsay Davidson (talk) 00:00, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep, this is tiresome, and I’ve said about INeverCry/Daphne Lantier what I’ve wanted to say and honestly don't think 🤔 that they’re worth it anymore, but the proposer is WMF banned and this account is blocked as a “vandalism-only account” so they clearly never had any intention on reforming their less than collaborative behaviour. By giving in to their deletion requests we are basically inviting them back to Wikimedia Commons, if Russavia started this request and INeverCry saw it then they would've deleted it on sight as a “sock request” so why should we tolerate it from a user that has done the things they did, and then legally threatened a colleague? w:en:DENY is much more than he deserves and an established editor can request this file for deletion, but by accepting this we are essentially saying “INeverCry isn't actually banned”. Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 09:15, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:06, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope - unused personal image Lindsay Davidson (talk) 00:03, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep, this is tiresome, and I’ve said about INeverCry/Daphne Lantier what I’ve wanted to say and honestly don't think 🤔 that they’re worth it anymore, but the proposer is WMF banned and this account is blocked as a “vandalism-only account” so they clearly never had any intention on reforming their less than collaborative behaviour. By giving in to their deletion requests we are basically inviting them back to Wikimedia Commons, if Russavia started this request and INeverCry saw it then they would've deleted it on sight as a “sock request” so why should we tolerate it from a user that has done the things they did, and then legally threatened a colleague? w:en:DENY is much more than he deserves and an established editor can request this file for deletion, but by accepting this we are essentially saying “INeverCry isn't actually banned”. Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 09:12, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:08, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Five images any of which unlikely is a own work. For example, EXIF in Hiding_behind_papers.jpg unambiguously reports “Copyright 2017. All rights reserved.” Incnis Mrsi (talk) 15:13, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• File:Cultural meeting place.jpg
• File:Student with panda.jpg
• File:Hug a tree.jpg
• File:Jumping on bridge.jpg
• File:Hiding behind papers.jpg

Lindsay Davidson (talk) 00:03, 4 February 2018 (UTC) [reply]

• Keep hug a tree, illustrative, in-scope. There are just 22 other photographs in the tree hugging category, so hardly overflowing with choice. --Fæ (talk) 19:03, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep, this is tiresome, and I’ve said about INeverCry/Daphne Lantier what I’ve wanted to say and honestly don't think 🤔 that they’re worth it anymore, but the proposer is WMF banned and this account is blocked as a “vandalism-only account” so they clearly never had any intention on reforming their less than collaborative behaviour. By giving in to their deletion requests we are basically inviting them back to Wikimedia Commons, if Russavia started this request and INeverCry saw it then they would've deleted it on sight as a “sock request” so why should we tolerate it from a user that has done the things they did, and then legally threatened a colleague? w:en:DENY is much more than he deserves and an established editor can request this file for deletion, but by accepting this we are essentially saying “INeverCry isn't actually banned”. Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 09:14, 7 February 2018 (UTC) my mistake.[reply]

@Incnis Mrsi: It is unacceptable to reformat or tamper with DRs after they have been posted, without making it extremely clear what you have done or simply getting the DR withdrawn, even if the nominator is a sock. Checking the page history of this DR, it was tampered with before I voted. Stop messing about, tampering with an active consensus process is a block-worthy offence, take it seriously. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 12:34, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: likely copyright violations, mix of copyright claims in EXIF data and "FBMD" metadata as well. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:12, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope - unused personal image Lindsay Davidson (talk) 00:11, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep, this is tiresome, and I’ve said about INeverCry/Daphne Lantier what I’ve wanted to say and honestly don't think 🤔 that they’re worth it anymore, but the proposer is WMF banned and this account is blocked as a “vandalism-only account” so they clearly never had any intention on reforming their less than collaborative behaviour. By giving in to their deletion requests we are basically inviting them back to Wikimedia Commons, if Russavia started this request and INeverCry saw it then they would've deleted it on sight as a “sock request” so why should we tolerate it from a user that has done the things they did, and then legally threatened a colleague? w:en:DENY is much more than he deserves and an established editor can request this file for deletion, but by accepting this we are essentially saying “INeverCry isn't actually banned”. Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 09:11, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:12, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely not in public domain; file is not simple enough nor was it first published prior to 1923. hiàn 00:18, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:21, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope

• File:Smitrip founder group.jpg
• File:LOGO SMITRIP.jpg

Hystrix (talk) 00:23, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:12, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

suspected copyvio; Photo claims: Fotograf Thomas Kunz, Uploader claims "own work, Pavlos Wacker" Foreign Species (talk) 00:52, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just talked to the photographer. How can i change the Photo claims to Thomas Kunz?

---

Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 01:21, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted software. Champion (Talk) 01:04, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:21, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio|source=http://caldense.com.br/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/ronaldao.jpg Py4nf (talk) 01:09, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 01:22, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

out of project scope

• File:BMW Club Freunde Westfalen Logo.jpg
• File:BMW Club Freunde Westfalen Jubiläumsbanner 10 Jahre.jpg

Didym (talk) 01:13, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:13, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope – own design of a flag. TFerenczy (talk) 02:37, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:13, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.

• File:Ben said-Math SX-BIOF.pdf
• File:-ben said-Les-connecteurs-linguistiques-pour-bien-écrire-et-argumenter.pdf
• File:تنشئة اجتماعية.pdf
• File:Ben said mohamed.jpg

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:07, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:14, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:09, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:14, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal file Lucy Tipilotu (talk) 04:30, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:14, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Insignificant micronation – out of scope. TFerenczy (talk) 03:32, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:15, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not used in any project, no reason to keep this file 119.30.35.4 04:49, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:15, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Worse version of logo already uploaded (by the same uploader?). See File:SIGMA CORPORATION.svg. Changed out use with the better, .SVG, version. Majora (talk) 05:00, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:15, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:56, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:17, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:58, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:17, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:02, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:17, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am simply opting out. Kevincpora (talk) 07:39, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:17, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is my logo but it is so boring. I upload my new logo made myself so I delete this file Tarunmehratm (talk) 07:53, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is my logo but it is so boring I made my new logo Tarunmehratm (talk) 09:14, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is my logo but it is so boring I n Tarunmehratm (talk) 09:15, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is my logo but it is so boring. I made my new logo today myself so I delete my old logo Tarunmehratm (talk) 09:18, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:17, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicated: FIle:Mészöly Bay of Lake Balaton with the Shores of Akarattya 1885.jpg. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 12:05, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:20, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

small resolution; missing EXIF; Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work.

• File:Hazara Female Cultural Dress.jpg
• File:AfghanistanHazaraBoys.jpg

Hystrix (talk) 02:39, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:31, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.

• File:Acrylic da benny-savagic moments.jpg
• File:Acrylic da benny .jpg

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:05, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:28, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image under copyright 82.240.248.8 08:05, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. Uploader should obtain permission from original author and submit an email to OTRS. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:30, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:11, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:28, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Likely false authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing original metadata, previous publications found elsewhere, and the uploader's history. The metadata has been altered to credit "Kamruzzaman Dinajpur" as the author, with a link to https://www.facebook.com/zamandp.

• File:রথীন্দ্রনাথ রায়.jpg – previously published at prothomalo.com on 2015-10-08. Photo by Khaled Sarkar according to the caption there. The uploader claims it was taken by Mohammad Zaman Khan, which they link to their own nonexistent user page.
• File:Dinajpur Central Eidgah Ground.jpg – previously published in higher resolution at oknews24bd.com on 2017-06-24.
• File:দিনাজপুর ঈদগাহ ময়দান.jpg – previously published at banglatribune.com on 2017-06-23.
• File:দিনাজপুর কেন্দ্রীয় শহীদ মিনার.jpg

—LX (talk, contribs) 09:33, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• EXIFs, indeed, are present.  Delete copyvio. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 22:32, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes, there is some metadata that's been added by social media sites or other post-processing, but the original (camera) metada is missing from all the photos. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:27, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:29, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:43, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:29, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

upload by new user with CC tag. However, no real information to confirm the uploader is the owner of the photo Matthew hk (talk) 12:12, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seem from Getty images https://www.gettyimages.com.au/license/910311922. Matthew hk (talk) 12:15, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: Done by Túrelio. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:42, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image seems to be a piece of the rchive (see uploader). But the Archive does not have the Copyright. Because of that, the image has the Copyright-tag in the title and also the uploader has tagged the image in the german article with a "©" Marcus Cyron (talk) 12:18, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:41, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Small photo without metadata, probably not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 13:55, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:42, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• File:Badacsonyi szüret.jpg
• File:Badacsonyi szüret (2).jpg
• File:Badacsonyi szüret (3).jpg
• File:Badacsonyi szüret (4).jpg
• File:Badacsonyi szüret (5).jpg
• File:Badacsonyi szüret (6).jpg
• File:Badacsonyi szüret (7).jpg
• File:Badacsonyi szüret (8).jpg
• File:Badacsonyi szüret (9).jpg

No proof that the author died more than 70 years ago. He was born in 1890. No source for the year of his death. --Regasterios (talk) 14:29, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1945-ben halt meg Szörényi Reischl. --Elekes Andor (talk) 21:51, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Forrás? --Regasterios (talk) 22:03, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

violación del copyright desde https://as.com/futbol/imagenes/2018/01/30/primera/1517331975_364270_1517335372_noticia_normal.jpg Tarawa (jo ta ke irabazi arte) 14:55, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Delete per nom. I tagged it as a copyvio.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 15:06, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: Done by Jcb. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:42, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:43, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:43, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. Irrelevant to article. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:43, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:44, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:44, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:44, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s).

• File:Cv sayed zia.pdf
• File:Bamiyan master plan.jpg
• File:Bamiyan master plan بامیان.jpg
• File:گزارش کامل اعمار قصر پغمان.pdf
• File:PAGHMAN PALACE2.pdf
• File:PAGHMAN PALACE.pdf
• File:ارائه راه کارهای تحقق مدیریت استراتژیک پروژه در مدیریت شهری.pdf
• File:Introduction to architectural and urban history in afghanistan.jpg

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:44, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:44, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused user images, out of scope, commons is not a web host

• File:RAFARAVAVY FLORETTE EN 2014.jpg
• File:RAFARAVAVY FLORETTE.jpg
• File:RAFARAVAVY FLORETTE EN 2009.jpg

Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 15:52, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:45, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:45, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:45, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in vanity article draft. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:45, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No author's permission, see EXIF.

• File:Gaidar Maria Yegorovna.jpg
• File:Марія Єгорівна Гайдар.jpg

Sealle (talk) 16:17, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Per COM:SCOPE: promotional (text only) Takeaway (talk) 17:38, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS permission... out of scope. Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 17:40, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:44, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:45, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats

• File:Eugene Podkletnov.pdf
• File:Birleşik Devletler Kütleçekimi Kontrol Araştırmaları.pdf
• File:Biefeld-Brown Etkisi.pdf
• File:Dean Sürücüsü.pdf

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:45, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:46, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:47, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality image of orang utan in San Diego Zoo of which there many better quality images already in Category:Apes at San Diego Zoo Takeaway (talk) 19:47, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source found. Image was a mirrored and cropped version of https://www.flickr.com/photos/michaelturk/524235961/in/album-72157600294626836/ which has non-comm restrictions. Speedy tagged. --Majora (talk) 22:57, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: Done by Túrelio. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:47, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Missing EXIF datas; possibly COM:ADVERT.

• File:BJ velocette.jpg
• File:Banda Velocette.jpg

Hystrix (talk) 19:58, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:47, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

© Laurent Zabulon, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:24, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:48, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

© Pierre Colletti, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:25, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:48, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright image. https://www.google.co.nz/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZiucoy84e1dj-tgKI7Ug-tWeOiY_1tbPvNBf2N5OKo7pJ6QfcoV8gFPKvXEEeIfHdxpRz60X1shUWf6JicYWus9qmENhYzW6yXrEF_1o91lJbjbN4ErOgpQnmyISCMciiBVkv5pGOX8FtQwYVQq-n7j6MSFnovJVKIb4OByYgGjZioQQ9vRYY5Zum9HKdK12CwCplCZlVZanQg6FesIhgAuu6Lh7aQoBwJFvglr3Td-EbfBT3C3NB5KnNBXVgf4sfHmQUBwh4SXLAHkMMgMr68JjD0qt88YEAu04z4vxUM7vBy9102lX4lPKNT9I9myN26pKlmWoXu46KM0dh97UfoATz9H1QP9Q NZFC^(talk) 22:32, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^T★C 07:47, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation of watermarked, obviously professional photograph of the Russian rapper Egor Kreed from Elle magazine that is also watermarked by a poster retail website. Mabalu (talk) 02:13, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:37, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Almost all of these files appear to be clear commercial images or professional photographs that are highly unlikely to have been released into the public domain. Reverse image searches show that some of the celebrity shots are from photoshoots. File:Крог.jpg appears to be a professional photograph of pumpkin or Category:Cucurbita seeds so even if it is not copyvio, it is a low-quality redundant image that does not seem to add to the many pumpkin seed shots already on here. File:Кроб.jpg actually appears a few times on a Google Image search with different seed backgrounds, (see here and here for the exact same sunflower (look at the petals) with two different seed backdrops, so again, this is highly unlikely to be a free-use image.

A lot of this user's other transfers from be.wikipedia.org do seem to be legit (or at least from people's own snapshots) but someone may want to do a double-check on the files that have not been nominated just to make sure (there are three black-and-white scanned photographs that appear as if they might be from an archive or library).

• File:Вапор.jpg
• File:Таппр.jpg
• File:Врог.jpg
• File:Проб.jpg
• File:Кроб.jpg
• File:Кроч.jpg
• File:Кров.jpg
• File:Крок.jpg
• File:Крол.jpg
• File:Крог.jpg
• File:Колн.jpg

Mabalu (talk) 02:37, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Delete all – not a single image I could take for an own work by an obscure Wikipedian. Also see below, please. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:42, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Black-and-white Soviet-era photos. Note a vintage Soviet-style bicycle at Улица_д_Юшковичы_Католикова_Е_М.jpg . Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:42, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• File:Улица д Юшковичы Католикова Е М.jpg
• File:Улица д. Юшковичи.jpg
• File:Летняя дойка Матвеенко Т П.jpg

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:36, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be own work. Been published before.[3] Hair style, beard trim, and studio lighting arrangements also appear to be identical to Studio Zappoli's image here:[4]. P.g.champion (talk) 15:03, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:36, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative history related file (map, coat of arms, flag) – out of scope.

• File:Dsfmap.png
• File:DSFSymbol.png
• File:DSFFlag.png

TFerenczy (talk) 03:23, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 16:13, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of insignificant micronation – out of scope. TFerenczy (talk) 03:42, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:02, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of insignificant micronation – out of scope. TFerenczy (talk) 03:42, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:02, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of insignificant micronation – out of scope. TFerenczy (talk) 03:44, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's own work, only used in sandbox of the user and not in other wikipediapages, so nothing is wrong with/about this image. The image exists on Wikipedia for years now. GingerbreadmanNL (talk) 13:10, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:02, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

National Institute of Informatics's images are copyrighted, see this.

• File:Cary Aug 17 1987 0300Z.jpg
• File:JMA TS 1987 Aug 10 1800Z.jpg
• File:Maury1987.jpg
• File:Sperry Jun 29 1987 0300Z.jpg
• File:Tropstormjune1987.jpg
• File:Typhoon Ian.jpg
• File:Vernon Jul 19 1987 0300Z.jpg
• File:Wynne Jul 26 1987 0300Z.jpg

B dash (talk) 07:02, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:37, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

National Institute of Informatics images are copyrighted

• File:Cary 1987-08-17 0300Z.jpg
• File:Freda 1987-09-10 0300Z.jpg
• File:Holly 1987-09-09 0100Z.jpg
• File:Ian 1987-09-26 0300Z.jpg
• File:Sperry 1987-06-28 0300Z.jpg

B dash (talk) 02:00, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 04:16, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clear copyright violation of the book cover and also the low originality photograph. Rahul Bott (talk) 07:54, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 16:12, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Personal picture of underage person (15 y.o.) without any noticeability - not useful for educational purposes, Commons used as picture hosting L736E (talk) 09:04, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:53, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Net-copyvio, no permission. The logo seems complex enough not to be below ToO.

• File:PlextekOverHeadTinnitusDetectionSystem-940x557.jpg
• File:PlextekInEarTinnitusDetectionSystem-940x631.jpg
• File:Plextek Logo.png

Ruthven (msg) 10:37, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:52, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Metadata say: "996-2004 AccuSoft Co., All rights reserved". The OTRS authorisation is needed from the copyright holder, unless those photos from the 1940s in Germany are in the public domain.

• File:Haus der Kunst 197.jpg
• File:Projekt11 0027.jpg
• File:Projekt11 0025.jpg
• File:Marktplatz Altenburg 1937.jpg
• File:Schlosskapelle Altenburg 1937.jpg
• File:Projekt11 0022.jpg
• File:Projekt11 0021.jpg
• File:Projekt11 0020.jpg
• File:Projekt11 0019.jpg
• File:Schlosshof Altenburg 1937.jpg
• File:Projekt11 0017.jpg
• File:Projekt11 0016.jpg
• File:Projekt11 0015.jpg
• File:Neuenmörbitz 1937.jpg
• File:Projekt11 0014.jpg
• File:Junkers W 34 (Cockpit).jpg
• File:Roland-Pfeil 00.jpg
• File:Junkers W 34.jpg
• File:Flugschiff DO.X (Funkstation).jpg
• File:Flugschiff DO.X.jpg
• File:Heinkel HE 70 Blitz.jpg
• File:Convair 340 (seitliche Aufnahme).jpg
• File:Convair 340 "Metropolitan".jpg
• File:ME-109 K-14.jpg
• File:Boing 377.jpg
• File:Boing 377 (seitliche Ansicht).jpg
• File:LZ 127 Graf Zeppelin.jpg
• File:Eröffnungsfeier des Haus der Kunst.jpg
• File:Leipziger Messe 1937.jpg

Ruthven (msg) 10:51, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(message copied from the talk page)

First of all, this is a school-project.

The „photographers“ are anonym, because the guy who gave me the photos wanted it like this (the photographers are his grandfathers, boath already died).

Maybe the given „photographer“ of the metadata is the name of the scanning-machine? My students digitalized the old photos at a scanning-workplace at the University of Mannheim, Germany. BBSWirtschaft1LU (talk) 18:19, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@BBSWirtschaft1LU: Well, then the nephews (all the heirs in any case) have to write to OTRS giving their permission, explaining the situation and the license they want to use. Check what that "All rights reserved" means, please, because it is not acceptable on Commons. --Ruthven (msg) 10:42, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:39, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Claimed as user's own work but is a screnshot. Red Jay (talk) 11:40, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:56, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Per COM:SCOPE: self-created artworks; Artwork without obvious educational use, including non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills.

• File:Chick.png
• File:Sail Boat.png
• File:Scale sheep 5.0.png
• File:Scale boat3.5.png

Takeaway (talk) 12:20, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Per COM:SCOPE: self-created artworks; Artwork without obvious educational use, including non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills.

• File:Washington DC Monument.png
• File:Cherry Blossom.png
• File:1 World Trade Freedom Tower.png
• File:White House DC.png
• File:Autism.png

Takeaway (talk) 20:12, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:54, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Sándor Sashegyi was alive from 1900 to 1958. Regasterios (talk) 14:42, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unknown author, taken around 1930. Free. --Elekes Andor (talk) 08:25, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think the author is unknown? Prove that the first issue of this photo was more than 70 years ago. This source is not enough for it. Do you know the original source? --Regasterios (talk) 20:03, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:18, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 15:06, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Kept: File used in personal userpage. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 16:10, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

self promotion, out of scope, no longer used on user page (deleted as self promotion) Cabayi (talk) 13:59, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:17, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 15:20, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 16:08, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

• File:Hkg meeting 6.jpg
• File:Hkg meeting 3.jpg
• File:Hkg meeting 5.jpg
• File:Hkg meeting 4.jpg

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

• File:1928 WACS Committee.pdf
• File:1928 WACS Committee members.pdf

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:57, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect orfano Mauro Tozzi (talk) 15:33, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Historical documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

• File:Frad062 5num 003 0057 01.pdf
• File:Frad062 5num 003 0057.pdf
• File:Frad062 5num 01 093 002 02.pdf
• File:Frad062 5num 01 093 001 01.pdf

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Delete per nom, COM:PRP, and COM:L.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 21:03, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Modern art. I think heir(s) identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

• File:Dal Sempione al Lago Maggiore.pdf
• File:REMY PAGGI Pra Bernardo V.Antrona (VB).jpg
• File:Remy Paggi - Varzo (VB) antica torre.jpg
• File:Remy Paggi - Agaro (VB)..jpg
• File:Remy Paggi - il bottaio.jpg
• File:Remy Paggi - La filatrice.jpg
• File:Remy Paggi Il gerlaio .jpg

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dichiaro di essere il creatore di questo contributo e che esso non víola i diritti di terze parti, e di essere d'accordo alla pubblicazione di questo contributo secondo i termini delle licenze Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 3.0 e GFDL. --Est modus in rebus (talk) 16:38, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:59, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maps doesn't seem to be covered by {{PD-PRC-exempt}}.

• File:ZGGG-1A.pdf
• File:ZGNN-1-2.pdf
• File:ZBAA-1A-2.pdf
• File:ZUUU-1A-2.pdf
• File:ZUCK-1A-2.pdf
• File:ZGHA-1A-2.pdf

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:00, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted graphic art on the ticket. Regasterios (talk) 15:58, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:00, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions and missing/inconsistent metadata.

• File:RedCorner Right Corner Vector.png
• File:Creative Arts Club.jpg – taken with a Nikon D3300 on 2017-07-19
• File:Moseleyandkids.jpg – taken with a Nikon D3300 on 2014-10-05
• File:Docent Tour.jpg – prominently features presumably non-free, copyrighted artwork by Monique Rollins, needs written permission from the artist in addition to the photographer. Metadata indicates the photo was grabbed from social media.
• File:ArtLoop Web Banner FALL.jpg – clearly watermarked Joe Hoddinott; needs written permission
• File:Delaware Contemporary Video Wall.jpg – taken with a Canon EOS 5D Mark IV on 2016-09-12. Prominently features presumably non-free, copyrighted artwork by unidentified artist.
• File:Perry 3.jpg – taken with a Nikon D7100 on 2016-06-04
• File:Delaware Contemporary Wedding Cake.jpg – taken with a Nikon D3S on 2013-08-10 by Kerry Harrison Photography
• File:MoniqueRollins 2017.jpg – prominently features presumably non-free, copyrighted artwork by Monique Rollins. Metadata indicates the photo was grabbed from social media.
• File:Domestic, MFA Biennial.jpg – prominently features presumably non-free, copyrighted artwork by unidentified artist
• File:Bob+Straight.jpg – prominently features presumably non-free, copyrighted artwork by Robert Straight, needs written permission from the artist in addition to the photographer.
• File:Caroline+Hatfield.png – prominently features presumably non-free, copyrighted artwork by Caroline Hatfield, needs written permission from the artist in addition to the photographer.
• File:Lauren Cotton Wavefronts Sept 2008.png
• File:The Art of Henry Loustau June 1994.png – prominently features presumably non-free, copyrighted artwork by Henry Loustau, needs written permission from the artist in addition to the photographer.
• File:Telling Tales Amalia Amaki Willie Cole Mildred Howard Oct 2004.png – prominently features presumably non-free, copyrighted artwork by Amalia Amaki, Willie Cole, and Mildred Howard, needs written permission from the artists in addition to the photographer.
• File:Gretchen Hupfel Time Spent Sept 2005.png – prominently features presumably non-free, copyrighted artwork by Gretchen Hupfel, needs written permission from the artist's heirs in addition to the photographer.
• File:Graham Daugherty Waterworks.png – prominently features presumably non-free, copyrighted artwork by Graham Daugherty, needs written permission from the artist in addition to the photographer.
• File:DCCA Waterworks.png
• File:DCCA work party.jpg
• File:DCCA Factory 2nd Floor 1991.png
• File:DCCA35years.jpg

—LX (talk, contribs) 16:08, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:01, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Needless low-quality raster duplicates of flags that already exist in far superior raster versions on Commons.

• File:HORVATIA FLAF.png
• File:EESTE FLAG.png
• File:INDONESIA FLAG.png
• File:RUSSIA FLAG.png
• File:ROMANIA FLAG.png
• File:PORTUGUES FLAG.png
• File:POLAND FLAG.png
• File:NORWAY FLAG.png
• File:UKRAINE FLAG.png
• File:MAGYAR FLAG.png
• File:NEDERLANDS FLAG.jpg
• File:TURKEY FLAG.jpg
• File:TAGALOG FLAG.png
• File:LATVIESU FLAG.png
• File:LIETUVIU FLAG.png
• File:JAPAN FLAG.png
• File:ITALIANO FLAG.png
• File:GERMANY FLAG.png
• File:CZECH FLAG.png
• File:EESTI FLAG.png
• File:BULGARIA FLAG.png
• File:BRASIL FLAG.png
• File:CHINA FLAG.png
• File:ARABIA FLAG.png
• File:FRANCE FLAG.png
• File:SUOMI FLAG.png
• File:SPANISH FLAG.png
• File:ENGLISH FLAG.png

—LX (talk, contribs) 17:08, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Wipe it out – English flag is . Incnis Mrsi (talk) 23:04, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: Source: Google, no permission and per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 16:07, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

One album cover, some small files without EXIF datas, some files in EXIF: Copyright 2012 (possibly COM:OTRS). Looks like COM:ADVERT.

• File:Storm Tones-Yohan Carlos.jpg
• File:Storm Tones-Mateus Ferreira.jpg
• File:Storm Tones-Lohan Carlos.jpg
• File:Storm Tones-clipe.jpg
• File:"Storm Tones"16bits.jpg
• File:"Storm Tones".jpg
• File:Storm Tones-Picture.jpg
• File:Storm Tones-Obsessão(Clipe).jpg
• File:Storm Tones-Obsessão.jpg
• File:Storm Tones-Studio.jpg
• File:Impacto Subliminar.jpg
• File:Storm Tones-Obsessão(Making of).jpg

Hystrix (talk) 19:22, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 16:21, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope – very low quality and heavily edited photographs. See other deleted files by the same uploader. Notified the author on their talk page to consider uploading the original files instead.

• File:Prague townhall at night.jpg
• File:Poděbrady Church.jpg
• File:Kostomlaty nad Labem nádraží 2018.jpg
• File:Santorini Greece 2.jpg
• File:Railway station Poděbrady mosaic.jpg
• File:Nymburk main railway station.jpg
• File:Rotund st.gregory mountain Ríp.jpg
• File:City Elefant train.jpg
• File:Prague 2018.jpg
• File:Poděbrady spa BF7018F.jpg
• File:Poděbrady clock 2018.jpg
• File:Poděbrady castle 2018.jpg
• File:Poděbrady nádraží 2018.jpg
• File:Santorini Greece.jpg
• File:Václav Havel airport Prague.jpg
• File:Ceský ráj hrad Trosky zámek Hrubá skála.jpg
• File:Prosecké skály 2017.jpg
• File:C10 Poděbrady náměstí a zámek.jpg
• File:HANOI tRAINS.jpg
• File:Praha Kyje kostel sv. Bartoloměje.jpg
• File:7D Lisboa Torre de Belém.jpg
• File:Janské lázně 2017 socha Krakonoš.jpg
• File:Park Přátelství Prosek Prague 9.jpg
• File:Hanoi Vietnam A-6D321149897F.jpg
• File:Prague subway Radlická B line.jpg
• File:Tram stop Geologická Prague.jpg
• File:Národní technické muzeum Prague 2017.jpg
• File:Petřiny subway station.jpg
• File:Rabac Croatia.jpg
• File:Barcelona Sagrada Familia 2017.jpg
• File:Zámek Karlova Koruna Chlumec nad Cidlinou.jpg
• File:EA4 Belvedere Prague.jpg
• File:Říčany u prahy ruin.jpg
• File:Munich - Mnichov.jpg
• File:Luzern Schweiz.jpg
• File:VeNICE 109.jpg
• File:Socha Jan Kašpar Pardubice.jpg
• File:Knihovna Barrandov.jpg
• File:Berlin 2018.jpg
• File:Pardubice památník Jan Kašpar - letec.jpg
• File:Prague Castle bw 2018.jpg
• File:Háje Prague 11.jpg
• File:Prague 9 Vysočany radnice.jpg
• File:Letohrádek Hvězda 2018.jpg
• File:Trojský zámek Prague 8.jpg
• File:Náměstí Míru subway line A.jpg
• File:Prague 8 Katastrální úřad budova.jpg
• File:Chodovská tvrz Prague Chodov.jpg
• File:Hrad Špilberk Brno leden 2018.jpg
• File:Katedrála svatého Víta Prague 2018.jpg
• File:Zámek Brandýs nad Labem 2018 koláž věže.jpg
• File:Zámek Brandýs nad Labem 2018 night.jpg
• File:Zámek Brandýs nad Labem 2018 detail.jpg
• File:Stará Boleslav radnice , socha sv.Václava 2017.jpg
• File:Katedrála svatého Víta Prague 2018 Jan).jpg
• File:Stará Boleslav radnice a náměstí 2017.jpg
• File:Katedrála svatého Víta Prague 2018 Jan.jpg
• File:Zámek Brandýs nad Labem 2018.jpg
• File:Praha hlavní nádraží návěstidlo.jpg
• File:Stará Boleslav v noci.jpg
• File:Stará Boleslav kresba.jpg
• File:London 2017 Big Ben bw.jpg
• File:London 2017 postcard.jpg
• File:Prague Karlov 2016.jpg
• File:Paris collage 2017.jpg
• File:Divadlo na Vinohradech Prague.jpg
• File:Hanoi bridge 2016.jpg
• File:Venice Benátky 2017.jpg
• File:Prague Christmas 2017.jpg
• File:A Paris Snow.jpg
• File:MOULIN ROUGE 2017.jpg
• File:E86B1Italy collage.jpg
• File:Ponte Vecchio Firenze 2017.jpg
• File:New York at night kw.jpg

TFerenczy (talk) 22:36, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Many images are already artworks, not “heavily edited photographs”. We must keep many of them if there is no copyright forgery. Now on the Village pump. @Tuvalkin: where are you when a real deletionist rampage happens? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 22:10, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @Incnis Mrsi: aren’t you going to use {{vk}}? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:20, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to assess individual pictures morning-after. Not all of them are “realistically useful”. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 22:47, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete by now – let‘s not endanger Commons over someone’s unscrupulous artistic experiments. Thanks TFerenczy for attracting attention to the case (albeit with a wrong pretext) and Alexis Jazz for yet another investigation. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:04, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• {{Vk}}: retouched/edited photographs are in scope. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:20, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Delete, per Alexis Jazz and Fæ. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 10:37, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment They are clearly within scope, but I do agree that every individual image should be assessed based on copyright ©, but if these are original works then there should be no issue. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 22:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• That’s right, but these are assumed to based on original works, in good faith. As any other such work, they risk being deleted if they are found to be copyvios. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:34, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Well, there goes COM:AGF, after Alexis Jazz’s findings. It’s now time for COM:PRP. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 10:37, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment Gallery for appraisal of these images. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:34, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Delete All those with app-added virtual objects, such as the butterflies in File:Ponte Vecchio Firenze 2017.jpg. Per COM:PRP it is doubtful that anyone will prove these are not copyrighted or the work of the uploader. As for others, I'm neutral --Fæ (talk) 23:33, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Looking at investigation by others, all the uploads must be considered to have significant doubt, so no longer neutral, delete all rather than investing more time in these. --Fæ (talk) 10:44, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Delete File:Kostomlaty nad Labem nádraží 2018.jpg surely isn't just a self-made painting. File:Obecní dům at night 2018.jpg is clearly based on [1] (people standing in the same places) which is "© 2011 by pingallery" but not credited in any way. And with "Obecní dům at night 2018.jpg" being copyvio, the same is likely to be true for the others. For many of them it is impossible to verify because there is no source and the modifications are blinding image search engines. Unless it can be proven that some image is based on a PD image or a CC image for which proper credit can be added, they should be deleted as copyvio. Even if they were fully original, it wouldn't matter for Commons because @MissKaB: is not a well known artist. Making these out of scope. - Alexis Jazz 23:41, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Oh joy, look at this: File:X-mas prague Vánoce.jpg. (which wasn't included in this DR) Merry Christmas.. I suspect the only real own work from this user is everything that was shot with a Canon Powershot A495, but we'll have to check. - Alexis Jazz 00:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Here is one more from the list: File:Trojský_zámek_Prague_8.jpg pasted into the original: imgur.com. (found at [2]) The clouds are identical, so this is the source. I'm not particularly interested in going on with this. We should assume all of these "drawings" are copyvio unless there is proof otherwise. - Alexis Jazz 05:50, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 16:57, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]